Abstract
This chapter argues that in Western, developed societies, young people’s decreasing engagement in mathematics has to do fundamentally with a cultural gap between the forms of subjectivity promoted by mathematics as areas of schooling, and the forms of subjectivity experienced by students in their everyday life. While the organization of mathematics in schooling is deeply rooted in Modernity and requires students to embody its core values in order to be successful, current culture offers a myriad of projects of becoming that compete effectively with school forms of subjectivity. An understanding of the youth’s lack of interest in terms of the cultural gap places mathematics education as a field of practice in the realm of the cultural politics of our time. Such displacement may offer alternative ways of thinking and acting with respect to youth’s engagement with mathematics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alrø, H., Skovsmose, O., & Valero, P. (2008). Inter-viewing foregrounds: Students’ motives for learning in a multicultural setting. In M. César & K. Kumpulainen (Eds.), Social interactions in multicultural settings (pp. 13–37). Rotterdam: Sense.
Appelbaum, P. (1995). Popular culture, educational discourse, and mathematics. New York: SUNY Press.
Aronowitz, S., & De Fazio, W. (1997). The new knowledge work. In A. H. Halsey, H. Lauder, P. Brown, & A. S. Wells (Eds.), Education: Culture, economy, and society (pp. 193–206). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Aronowitz, S., & Giroux, H. (1991). Postmodern education: Politics, culture and social criticism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Ashton, D. N., & Sung, J. (1997). Education, skill formation and economic development: The Singaporean approach. In A. H. Halsey, H. Lauder, P. Brown, & A. S. Wells (Eds.), Education: Culture, economy, and society (pp. 207–218). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bauchspies, W. (2009). Potentials, actuals and residues: Entanglements of culture and subjectivity. Subjectivity, 28, 229–245.
Best, S., & Kellner, D. (2003). Contemporary youth and the postmodern adventure. Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies, 25(2), 75–93.
Biesta, G. (2005). Against learning: Reclaiming a language for education in an age of learning. Nordisk Pædagogik, 25(1), 54–55.
Biesta, G., & Egéa-Kuehne, D. (2001). Derrida & education. London: Routledge.
Bishop, A. J. (1988). Mathematical enculturation: A cultural perspective on mathematics education. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Bishop, A. J., Clements, K., Keitel, C., Kilpatrick, J., & Laborde, C. (Eds.). (1996). International handbook of mathematics education. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Bishop, A. J., Clements, M. A., Keitel, C., Kilpatrick, J., & Leung, F. K. S. (Eds.). (2003). Second international handbook of mathematics education. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Black, L., Mendick, H., & Solomon, Y. (2009). Mathematical relationships in education: Identities and participation. New York: Routledge.
Blackman, S. (2005). Youth subcultural theory: A critical engagement with the concept, its origins and politics, from the Chicago school to postmodernism. Journal of Youth Studies, 8(1), 1–20.
Boaler, J. (1998). Nineties girls challenge eighties stereotypes: Updating gender perspectives. In C. Keitel (Ed.), Social justice and mathematics education: Gender, class, ethnicity and the politics of schooling (pp. 278–293). Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin.
Carr, M. (1996). Motivation in mathematics. Cresskill: Hampton.
Chevallard, Y. (1985). La transposition didactique. Grenoble: La Pensée Sauvage.
Cobb, P., McClain, K., Silva Lamberg, T. D., & Dean, C. (2003). Situating teachers’ instructional practices in the institutional setting of the school and district. Educational Researcher, 32(6), 13–25.
Coray, D., Furinghetti, F., Gispert, H., & Schubring, G. (Eds.). (2003). One hundred years of L’Enseignement Mathématique: Moments of mathematics education in the twentieth century. Geneva: L’Enseignement Mathématique.
Ernest, P. (1991). The philosophy of mathematics education. London: Falmer.
European Commission. (2004). Europe needs more scientists. Report by the high level group on increasing human resources for science and technology in Europe. Brussels: European Commission.
Fehr, H. F., Bunt, L. N. H., & OECE. (1961). Mathématiques nouvelles. Paris: OECE.
Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777–795.
Fox, M. A. (2001). Pan-organizational summit on the U.S. science and engineering workforce: Meeting summary. Washington: National Academy of Sciences.
Fraser, B. J., & Tobin, K. G. (1998). International handbook of science education. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
García, G., Valero, P., Camelo, F., Mancera, G., Romero, J., Peñaloza, G., & Samaca, M. (2010). Escenarios de aprendizaje de las matemáticas: Un estudio desde la perspectiva de la educación matemática critica. Bogotá: Universidad Pedagógica Nacional de Colombia.
Goos, M., Kahne, J., & Westheimer, J. (2004). Learning mathematics in a classroom community of inquiry. A pedagogy of collective action and reflection: Preparing teachers for collective school leadership. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(4), 258–292.
Grouws, D. A. (Ed.). (1992). Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. New York: Macmillan.
Gutierrez, R. (2013). The sociopolitical turn in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(1), 37–68.
Haarder, B. (2009). Naturfag er almen dannelse. In Undervisningsministeriet (Ed.), Natur, teknik og sundhed. For alle og for de få. I bredden og i dybden (pp. 8–13). Copenhagen: Undervisningsministeriet.
Harding, S. (1998). Is science multicultural? Colonialisms, feminisms, and epistemologies. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Illeris, K., Katznelson, N., Simonsen, B., & Ulriksen, L. (2002). Ungdom, identitet og uddannelse. Frederiksberg: Roskilde Universitetsforlag.
Kahane, R., & Rapoport, T. (1997). The origins of postmodern youth: Informal youth movements in a comparative perspective. New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Keeves, J. P., & Darmawan, I. G. N. (2009). Science teaching. In L. J. Saha & A. G. Dworkin (Eds.), The new international handbook of research on teachers and teaching (pp. 975–1000). New York: Springer.
Kilpatrick, J. (1997). Five lessons from the New Math era. Paper presented at the conference Reflecting on Sputnik: Linking the past, present, and future of educational reform, National Academy of Sciences of the USA, Washington, DC.
Knijnik, G. (2008). Landless peasants of Southern Brazil and mathematics education: A study of three different language games. In J. F. Matos, K. Yasukawa, & P. Valero (Eds.), Proceedings of the fifth international mathematics education and society conference (pp. 312–319). Lisbon: Centro de Investigaçao em Educaçao, Universidade de Lisboa.
Knijnik, G., & Wanderer, F. (2010). Mathematics education and differential inclusion: A study about two Brazilian time–space forms of life. ZDM – The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 42(3–4), 349–360.
Krapp, A. (1999). Interest, motivation and learning: An educational-psychological perspective. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14(1), 23–40.
Laisant, C.-A., & Fehr, H. (1899). Préface. L’Enseignement Mathématique, 1(1), 1–5.
Lerman, S. (2006). Cultural psychology, anthropology and sociology: The developing ‘strong’ social turn. In J. Maasz & W. Schloeglmann (Eds.), New mathematics education research and practice (pp. 171–188). Rotterdam: Sense.
Leung, F. K. (2006). Mathematics education in East Asia and the West: Does culture matter? In F. K. Leung, K. D. Graf, & F. Lopez-Real (Eds.), Mathematics education in different cultural traditions: A comparative study of East Asia and the West (pp. 21–46). New York: Springer.
Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Mendick, H. (2005). Mathematical stories: Why do more boys than girls choose to study mathematics at AS-level in England? British Journal of Sociology of Education, 26(2), 236–251.
Menghini, M., Furinghetti, F., Giacardi, L., & Arzarello, F. (Eds.). (2008). The first century of the international commission of mathematical instruction (1908–2008): Reflecting and shaping the world of mathematics education. Rome: Istituto della Enciclopedia Italiana.
Moreau, M.-P., Mendick, H., & Epstein, D. (2010). Constructions of mathematicians in popular culture and learners’ narratives: A study of mathematical and non-mathematical subjectivities. Cambridge Journal of Education, 40(1), 25–38.
Morgan, C. (2009). Questioning the mathematics curriculum: A discursive approach. In L. Black, H. Mendick, & Y. Solomon (Eds.), Mathematical relationships in education: Identities and participation (pp. 97–106). New York: Routledge.
National Academies. (2007). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Washington: National Academies Press.
Oblinger, D. (2003). Boomers, gen-xers, and millennials: Understanding the “new students”. EDUCAUSE Review, 38(4), 36–47.
OECD. (2006). Evolution of student interest in science and technology studies. Policy report. Paris: OECD.
Ostermeier, C., Prenzel, M., & Duit, R. (2010). Improving science and mathematics instruction: The SINUS project as an example for reform as teacher professional development. International Journal of Science Education, 32(3), 303–327.
Pais, A., & Valero, P. (2012). Researching research: Mathematics education in the political. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80(1), 9–24.
Pearson, W. J. (2008). Who will do science? Revisited. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the commission on professionals in science and engineering, Baltimore. www.cpst.org/2008meeting/presentations/pearson-chubin-davis.pdf. Accessed 24 Mar 2014.
Pickering, A. (2011). H-: Brains, selves and spirituality in the history of cybernetics. Metanexus, 9(3). Retrieved from metanexus website: http://www.metanexus.net/essay/h-brains-selves-and-spirituality-history-cybernetics
Popkewitz, T. S. (2004a). The alchemy of the mathematics curriculum: Inscriptions and the fabrication of the child. American Educational Research Journal, 41(1), 3–34.
Popkewitz, T. S. (2004b). School subjects, the politics of knowledge, and the projects of intellectuals in change. In P. Valero & R. Zevenbergen (Eds.), Researching the socio-political dimensions of mathematics education: Issues of power in theory and methodology (pp. 251–267). Boston: Kluwer.
Popkewitz, T. S. (2008). Cosmopolitanism and the age of school reform: Science, education, and making society by making the child. New York: Routledge.
Popkewitz, T. S. (2009). Curriculum study, curriculum history, and curriculum theory: The reason of reason. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 41(3), 301–319.
PRIMAS. (2013). Promoting inquiry-based learning in mathematics and science across Europe. www.primas-project.eu/en/index.do. Accessed 23 Apr 2013.
Radford, L. (2008). The ethics of being and knowing: Towards a cultural theory of learning. In L. Radford, G. Schubring, & F. Seeger (Eds.), Semiotics in mathematics education: Epistemology, history, classroom, and culture (pp. 215–234). Rotterdam: Sense.
Roth, W.-M., & Tobin, K. (2009). The world of science education: Handbook of research in North America. Rotterdam: Sense.
Schreiner, C. (2006). Exploring a ROSE garden: Norwegian youth’s orientations towards science – Seen as signs of late modern identities. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Oslo.
Schreiner, C., & Sjøberg, S. (2007). Science education and young people’s identity construction: Two mutually incompatible projects? In D. Corrigan, J. Dillon, & R. Gunstone (Eds.), The re-emergence of values in science education (pp. 231–248). Rotterdam: Sense.
Sfard, A. (2008). Thinking as communicating. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sfard, A., & Prusak, A. (2006). Telling identities: In search of an analytic tool for investigating learning as a culturally shaped activity. Educational Researcher, 34(4), 14–22.
Sierpinska, A. (1994). Understanding in mathematics. London: Falmer.
Sjøberg, S., & Schreiner, C. (2010). The ROSE project: An overview and key findings. Oslo: Oslo University.
Skovsmose, O. (1994). Towards a philosophy of critical mathematics education. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Skovsmose, O., & Valero, P. (2001). Breaking political neutrality: The critical engagement of mathematics education with democracy. In B. Atweh, H. Forgasz, & B. Nebres (Eds.), Sociocultural research on mathematics education: An international perspective (pp. 37–55). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Skovsmose, O., Scandiuzzi, P. P., Valero, P., & Alrø, H. (2008). Learning mathematics in a borderland position: Students’ foregrounds and intentionality in a Brazilian favela. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 1(1), 35–59.
Smith, E., & Gorard, S. (2011). Is there a shortage of scientists? A re-analysis of supply for the UK. British Journal of Educational Studies, 59(2), 159–177.
Stentoft, D., & Valero, P. (2009). Identities-in-action: Exploring the fragility of discourse and identity in learning mathematics. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 14(3), 55–77.
Stentoft, D., & Valero, P. (2010). Fragile learning in mathematics classrooms: Exploring mathematics lessons within a pre-service course. In M. Walshaw (Ed.), Unpacking pedagogies: New perspectives for mathematics (pp. 87–107). Charlotte: IAP.
Tobin, K. G. (2006). Teaching and learning science: A handbook. Westport: Praeger.
Troelsen, R. (2005). Unges interesse for naturfag: Hvad ved vi, og hvad kan vi bruge det til? MONA, 2, 7–21.
Ulriksen, L. (2003). Børne- og ungdomskultur og naturfaglige uddannelser. In H. Busch, S. Horst, & R. Troelsen (Eds.), Inspiration til fremtidens naturfaglige uddannelser. En antologi (pp. 285–318). Copenhagen: Undervisningsministeriet.
Valero, P. (2004a). Postmodernism as an attitude of critique to dominant mathematics education research. In M. Walshaw (Ed.), Mathematics education within the postmodern (pp. 35–54). Greenwich: IAP.
Valero, P. (2004b). Socio-political perspectives on mathematics education. In P. Valero & R. Zevenbergen (Eds.), Researching the socio-political dimensions of mathematics education: Issues of power in theory and methodology (pp. 5–24). Boston: Kluwer.
Valero, P. (2010). Mathematics education as a network of social practices. In V. Durand-Guerrier, S. Soury-Lavergne, & F. Arzarello (Eds.), Proceedings of the sixth congress of the European society for research in mathematics education (pp. 54–80). Lyon: Institut National de Récherche Pédagogique.
Valero, P., García, G., Camelo, F., Mancera, G., & Romero, J. (2012). Mathematics education and the dignity of being. Pythagoras, 33(2), 171–179.
Walkerdine, V. (1988). The mastery of reason: Cognitive development and the production of rationality. London: Routledge.
Walshaw, M. (2004). Mathematics education within the postmodern. Greenwich: IAP.
Winbourne, P. (2009). Choice: Parents, teachers, children, and ability grouping in mathematics. In L. Black, H. Mendick, & Y. Solomon (Eds.), Mathematical relationships in education: Identities and participation (pp. 58–70). New York: Routledge.
Wood, T., Sullivan, P., Tirosh, D., Krainer, K., & Jaworski, B. (Eds.). (2008). The international handbook of mathematics teacher education (Vol. 4). Rotterdam: Sense.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Valero, P. (2015). Re-interpreting Students’ Interest in Mathematics: Youth Culture and Subjectivity. In: Gellert, U., Giménez Rodríguez, J., Hahn, C., Kafoussi, S. (eds) Educational Paths to Mathematics. Advances in Mathematics Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15410-7_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15410-7_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15409-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15410-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)