Skip to main content

Facilitating Deliberate Dialogue in Mathematics Classroom

  • Chapter
Book cover Educational Paths to Mathematics

Abstract

This chapter develops the concept of ‘deliberative dialogue’ to explore crucial characteristics of mathematics classroom practice, in which the promotion of social participation is an explicit aim. It presents two case studies: one on future teachers facing deliberate dialogues, another on on-line deliberate dialogue in a secondary school mathematics classroom. It concludes that more pre-service and in-service teachers should be involved in design-based research activities that seek to facilitate participation and deliberate dialogue in mathematics classrooms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alrø, H., & Skovsmose, O. (2002). Dialogue and learning in mathematics education: Intention, reflection and critique. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bairral, M. A., & Powell, A. B. (2013). Interlocution among problem solvers collaborating online: A case study with prospective teachers. Pro-Posiçöes, 24(1), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2012). Redes de indignación y esperanza. Los movimientos sociales en la era de Internet. Madrid: Alianza.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P., Stephan, M., McClain, K., & Gravemeijer, K. (2001). Participating in classroom mathematical practices. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10(1&2), 113–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (2008). Democracy and education: An educational classic. Radford: Wilder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Englund, T. (2006). Deliberative communication: A pragmatist proposal. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38(5), 503–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Englund, T. (2011). The potential of education for creating mutual trust: Schools as sites for deliberation. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43(3), 236–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giménez, J., Font, V., & Vanegas, Y. M. (2013). Designing professional tasks for didactical analysis as a research process. In C. Margolinas (Ed.), Proceedings of ICMI Study 22 “Task design in mathematics education” (pp. 581–590). Oxford: ICMI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorgorió, N., Planas, N., & Vilella, X. (2000). The cultural conflict in the mathematics classroom: Overcoming its “invisibility”. In A. Ahmed, J. M. Kraemer, & H. Wiliams (Eds.), Cultural diversity in mathematics (education): CIEAEM 51 (pp. 179–185). Chichester: Horwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. (1996). Democracy and disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1987). The theory of communicative action (Lifeworld and systems: A critique of functionalist reason, Vol. 2). Boston: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, M. (1999). Issues associated with participation in on line forums: The case of the communicative learner. Education and Information Technologies, 4(4), 353–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, M., & Wiriyapinit, M. (2005). Learning through online discussion: A case of triangulation in research. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 21(3), 283–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, J. M., & Bruckman, A. S. (2004). The Bystander effect: A lens for understanding patterns of participation. The Journal of Learning Sciences, 13(2), 165–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, N., & Kennedy, D. (2011). Community of philosophical inquiry as a discursive structure, and its role in school curriculum design. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 45(2), 265–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krummheuer, G. (2007). Argumentation and participation in the primary mathematics classroom: Two episodes and related theoretical abductions. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 26(1), 60–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McCoy, M. L., & Scully, P. L. (2002). Deliberative dialogue to expand civic engagement: What kind of talk does democracy need? National Civic Review, 91(2), 120–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pruitt, B., & Thomas, P. (2007). Democratic dialogue: A handbook for practitioners. Washington, DC: Trydells Tryckeri.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, G. (2004). E-moderating: The key to teaching and learning online (2nd ed.). London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serradó, A. (2009). E-forum, a strategy for developing key competences of communication in, with and about mathematics. In L. Gómez Chova, D. Martí Belenguer, & I. Candel Torres (Eds.), Proceedings of the international conference and new learning technologies (EDULEARN) (pp. 1–12). Barcelona: IATED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serradó, A. (2012). How to question in an on-line forum to promote a democratic mathematical knowledge construction? International Journal for Mathematics in Education, 4, 369–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skovsmose, O., & Valero, P. (2001). Breaking political neutrality: The critical engagement of mathematics education with democracy. In B. Atweh, H. Forgasz, & B. Nebres (Eds.), Socio-cultural aspects of mathematics education: An international research perspective (pp. 37–56). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valero, P. (1999). Deliberative mathematics education for social democratization in Latin America. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 31(1), 20–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanegas, Y. M. (2013). Competencias ciudadanas y desarrollo profesional en matemáticas. Unpublished PhD thesis, Universitat de Barcelona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanegas, Y. M., & Giménez, J. (2012). What future mathematics teachers understand as democratical values. International Journal for Mathematics in Education, 4, 457–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yankelovich, D. (1999). The magic of dialogue: Transforming conflict into cooperation. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work presented was realized in the framework of the following Research Projects: (1) REDICE-10-1001-13 “A competencial perspective about the Master’s Training for Secondary School Mathematics Teachers”. (2) EDU2012-32644 “Development of a program by competencies in a initial training for Secondary School Mathematics”. It was supported by the Agrupació de Recerca en Ciències de l’Educació in 2013 and the Comissionat per a Universitats I Recerca del DIUE from Generalitat de Catalunya (GREAV 2014 SGR 485).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana Serradó .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Serradó, A., Vanegas, Y., Giménez Rodríguez, J. (2015). Facilitating Deliberate Dialogue in Mathematics Classroom. In: Gellert, U., Giménez Rodríguez, J., Hahn, C., Kafoussi, S. (eds) Educational Paths to Mathematics. Advances in Mathematics Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15410-7_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics