Abstract
In cardiac arrest, the SESAME-protocol proposes to scan first the lung for two major targets: pneumothorax and clearance for fluid therapy. This information can be obtained in less than 5 s, i.e., a minimal hindrance in the course of resuscitation.
The SESAME-protocol then scans the lower femoral veins and the belly (first if trauma), for detecting pulmonary embolism or massive bleeding.
Then a pericardial tamponade is sought for.
Cardiac causes then follow, in position 5.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Fuhlbrigge A, Choi A (2012) Diagnostic procedures in respiratory diseases. In: Harrison’s principles of internal medicine, 18th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, p 2098
Lichtenstein D, Mezière G (2008) Relevance of lung ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute respiratory failure. The BLUE-protocol. Chest 134:117–125
Lichtenstein D, Mezière G, Lagoueyte JF, Biderman P, Goldstein I, Gepner A (2009) A-lines and B-lines: lung ultrasound as a bedside tool for predicting pulmonary artery occlusion pressure in the critically ill. Chest 136:1014–1020
Lichtenstein D (2015) BLUE-protocol and FALLS-protocol, two applications of lung ultrasound in the critically ill. Chest 147:1659–1670
Goldhaber SZ (2002) Echocardiography in the management of pulmonary embolism. Ann Intern Med 136:691–700
Schmidt GA (1998) Pulmonary embolic disorders. In: Hall JB, Schmidt GA, Wood LDH (eds) Principles of critical care, 2nd edn. McGraw Hill, New York, pp 427–449
Blaivas M, Fox JC (2001) Outcome in cardiac arrest patients found to have cardiac standstill on the bedside E.R. department echocardiogram. Acad Emerg Med 8:616–621
Soleil C, Plaisance P (2003) Management of cardiac arrest. Réanimation 12:153–159
Salen P, O’Connor R, Sierzenski P et al (2001) Can cardiac sonography and capnography be used independently and in combination to predict resuscitation outcomes? Acad Emerg Med 8:610–615
Breitkreutz R, Walcher F, Seeger FH (2007) Focused echocardiographic evaluation in resuscitation management: concept of an advanced life support-conformed algorithm. Crit Care Med 35:S150–S161
van der Werf TS, Zijlstra JG (2004) Ultrasound of the lung: just imagine. Intensive Care Med 30:183–184
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Electronic Supplementary Material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Pericardial tamponade. This video clip shows for the youngest a basic pericardial tamponade from a subcostal window. The heart is recognized, beating, and surrounded by an external line: pericardial effusion is diagnosed. This effusion is substantial (20 mm at the inferior aspect). The right cardiac cavities are collapsed, indicating here a tamponade (MOV 2502 kb)
Asystole. Nothing much to be written here. A few seconds were necessary for recording this loop. This is a fresh cardiac arrest, maybe the visible floating sludge is a sign of recent arrest (good neurological recovery after ROSC in this hypoxic arrest) (MOV 2502 kb)
Appendix 1: Our Adapted Technique for Pericardiocentesis
Appendix 1: Our Adapted Technique for Pericardiocentesis
Technically, the cardiac compressions are discontinued, the subxiphoid area is disinfected, and the needle and the microconvex probe make a rather sharp angle (like 30°). Our special 60-mm 16 G catheter is used (ELSISCEC protocol, described in Chap. 34). Thick fluid requires larger catheters. The section on venous cannulation in Chap. 34 describes our extremely simple way of ultrasound-assisted procedures. No need for a 65-statement ICC, just check that the four points are aligned two by two, and go.
Now the needle is inserted, through some liver parenchyma (large vessels, clearly seen, are avoided). If the tip is lost, slight (millimetric) Carmen maneuvers find it back. When a metallic structure penetrates a large fluid rounded cavity, plenty of arciform artifacts can be generated (a “firework sign” should be a self-speaking term). The physician must concentrate only on the needle tip.
Our habit is to keep the end of the needle open, at atmospheric pressure, without syringe: the pericardial fluid under tension will spontaneously spout out (try to collect some fluid for analysis, and volume assessment). This allows to keep the needle in the pericardial sac and far from the heart. These good sense maneuvers simplify the technique.
Once fluid pours out, two options are possible: keep the entire catheter as it is, and withdraw it when a reasonable amount of fluid has been evacuated, in order to avoid harm to the heart (initially protected by the pericardial fluid). Or withdraw the metal part for making no risk of cardiac harm, but consider the obliquity of the needle tip (usually 4 mm) and secure this procedure by inserting at least 5 mm of needle within the pericardial sac. A syringe can be mounted, vacuum can be made (two operators may be wise, one firmly maintaining the catheter). According to the volume-pressure curve of the pericardium, a minimal amount is sufficient for fixing the adiastole, allowing a return of spontaneous circulation. If the pericardial effusion is 25 mm large, the first few milliliters of withdrawn fluid will decrease the pressure far more than the volume, and this is the target. If inserting 5 mm of the whole needle, there are still 20 mm (or slightly less) of safety distance from the heart. In the ultrasound domain, this is a comfortable margin.
Several other protocols may be imagined after – we let the user free of his/her own technique.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lichtenstein, D.A. (2016). Lung Ultrasound as the First Step of Management of a Cardiac Arrest: The SESAME-Protocol. In: Lung Ultrasound in the Critically Ill. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15371-1_31
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15371-1_31
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15370-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15371-1
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)