Abstract
Recent developments in international football governance seem to be progressively leading toward an increasing use of technological devices for refereeing purposes. Opponents to change are often portrayed as old-fashioned and conservative. Philosophy might be of some help to overcome the dispute. In this paper, we first explore several concepts that are central to the current debate on football refereeing. Then, we determine the business of referees in relation to rules. We assess different arguments displayed regarding the role of chance and skills in competitions. Finally, we argue for the idea of referees as full players in football games.
Keywords
Mathematics Subject Classification
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Catteeuw, P. et al.: Offside decision making in the 2002 and 2006 FIFA world cups. J. Sports Sci. 28(10), 1027–1032 (2010)
Collins, H.: The philosophy of umpiring and the introduction of decision-aid technology. J. Philos. Sport 37, 135–146 (2010)
Colwell, S.: The ‚letter‘ and the ‚spirit‘: football laws and refereeing in the twenty-first century. Soccer Soc. 1(1), 201–214 (2000)
FIFA: The Laws of the Game 2014/2015. FIFA, Zurich (2014)
Fleming, N.: Tell fans definitive calls are an impossible goal. Nature 497, 537 (2013)
Hintikka, J., Bachman, J.: What If …? Toward Excellence in Reasoning. Mayfield Publishing, Mountain View, CA (1991)
McFee, G.: Fairness, epistemology, and rules: a prolegomenon to a philosophy of officiating. J. Philos. Sport 38(2), 229–253 (2011)
Pequeno, T., Béziau, J.-Y.: Rules of the game. In: Béziau J.-Y., Coniglio, M.E. (eds.) Logic without Frontiers, pp. 121–134. College Publication, London (2011)
Pielke Jr., R.: How innovations such as goal-line technology make sport better. PoliticalScience blog (hosted by The Guardian), 5 June 2013
Plessner, H., Betsch, T.: Sequential effects in important referee decisions: the case of penalties in soccer. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 23, 254–259 (2001)
Richards, T. (ed.): Soccer and Philosophy. Open Court, Chicago & La Salle, IL (2010)
Wilson, J.: Inverting the Pyramid: the History of Football Tactics. Orion, London (2014)
Acknowledgment
This paper draws upon research supported by the Estonian Research Council PUT 267 ‚Diagrammatic mind: logical and communicative aspects of iconicity‘ (Principal investigator Professor Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen) and by the basic research program at the National Research University Higher School of Economics (Moscow, Russia). A previous version of this paper was presented at the Faculty Seminar on Philosophy in the Ragnar Nurkse School of Innovation and Governance (Tallinn University of Technology, 24 September, 2014) and at the 10th Annual Estonian Philosophy Conference (University of Tartu, 25–27 September, 2014). We would like to express our gratitude to the participants who attended our talks for their remarks and suggestions that contributed to the shaping of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Moktefi, A., Schang, F. (2015). On Rules and Refereeing in Football. In: Koslow, A., Buchsbaum, A. (eds) The Road to Universal Logic. Studies in Universal Logic. Birkhäuser, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15368-1_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15368-1_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15367-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15368-1
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)