Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Potential and Challenges of Project-Based Learning in Engineering Education at the United Arab Emirates University

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advances in Engineering Education in the Middle East and North Africa

Abstract

Learning styles of most engineering students and teaching styles of most engineering instructors are incompatible in several dimensions. Many or most engineering students are visual, sensing, inductive, and active, whereas engineering education is mostly verbal (auditory), abstract (intuitive), deductive, passive, and sequential. These mismatches lead to poor pupil performance, professorial frustration and a barrier to producing many potentially excellent engineers. The modern method of engineering education involves contemporary teaching and learning practices using project- and program-based learning, work-integrated learning and integrative learning approaches. The project-based learning (PBL) is acknowledged as a collaborative, progressive, student-centered, interactive, active, and deep-learning approach. The chapter describes the learning styles of engineering students, teaching approaches of engineering instructors, role of smart technologies, and their applications for the implementation of PBL in engineering education at the United Arab Emirates University (UAEU). Students and instructors were surveyed to understand their learning and instruction manners. Most engineering students at UAEU are observed to be active, visual, sensory, and sequential, whereas surveyed engineering instructors exhibited their strong preference for the expert and delegator style of instruction. Instructors also exhibited their preference for a facilitator style of teaching. Previous studies discovered that the PBL approach prefers the facilitator style of education rather than expert or delegator styles. It was observed that both students and instructors at UAEU are aware of, have adequate institutional supports, and are using advanced technologies in their learning and teaching. Thus, in spite of some manageable constraints, there is potential for implementing PBL in engineering instruction at the UAEU.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Al-Maati, S. A., & Damaj, I. (2010). Developing a sustainable engineering education in the Middle East and north Africa region, transforming engineering education: Creating interdisciplinary skills for complex global environments, 2010 IEEE, Dublin, 6–9 April 201, pp. 1–11, doi:10.1109/TEE.2010.5508888.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, M. (1991). Learning styles of the graduate career change woman engineer: Then and now, Proceedings of GASAT 6th International Conference, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyer, K. (1993). Gender, science anxiety and learning style. Proceedings of GASAT 7th International Conference, University of Waterloo, Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bielenberg, B. T. (2005). Characteristics of the UAE Higher Education Student, Proceedings of the 6th Annual UAEU Research Conference, UAE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2007). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does (3rd ed.). Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloxham, S., & West, A. (2004). Understanding the rules of the game: Marking peer assessment as a medium for developing students’ conceptions of assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(6), 721–733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3, 4), 369–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boles, W., Hadgraft, R., & Howard, P. (2009). Exploring synergies between learning and teaching in engineering: A case study approach. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 15(1), 19–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cangelosi, S. J. (2003). Teaching mathematics in secondary and middle school. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • CETL. (2012a). Faculty attitudes towards technology-supported learning environments, center of excellence in teaching and learning, United Arab Emirates University.

    Google Scholar 

  • CETL. (2012b). Comparative survey of students’ attitudes concerning the use of educational technology, center of excellence in teaching and learning, United Arab Emirates University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffield, F., Moseley, D., Hall, E., & Ecclestone, K. (2004). Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning: A systematic and critical review, Learning and Skills Research Centre, www.LSRC.ac.uk.

  • Cross, K. P. (1998). Opening windows on learning: The cross papers number 2. Mission Viejo, CA: League for Innovation in the Community College and Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, K. P. (1999). Learning is about making connections: The cross papers number 3. Mission Viejo, CA: League for Innovation in the Community College and Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyball, R., Brown, V., & Keen, M. (2007). Towards sustainability: Five strands of social learning. In A. E. J. Wals (Ed.), Social learning towards a sustainable world; principles, perspectives, and praxis (pp. 181–195). The Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewell, P. T. (1997). Organizing for learning: A new imperative. AAHE Bulletin, 50(4), 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felder, R. (1993). Reaching the second tier: Learning and teaching styles in college science education. Journal of College Science Teaching, 23(5), 286–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felder, R. (1999). Index of learning styles (ILS), http://www.engr.ncsu.edu/learningstyles/ilsweb.html. Assessed Feb 2012.

  • Felder, R., & Silverman, L. (1988). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering Education, 78(7), 674–681.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, I. S. (2003). From solo-run to mainstream thinking: Project-based learning in engineering design. European Journal of Engineering Education, 28, 331–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillway, M., & Bielenberg, B. (2006). Adapting problem-based learning for the first-year experience. UGRU Journal, 3(Fall 2006), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grasha, A. (1994). A matter of style: The teacher as expert, formal authority, personal model, facilitator and delegator. College Teaching, 42(4), 142–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harding, J. (1996). Girls’ achievement in science and technology: Implications for pedagogy. In: P. F. Murphy & C. J. Gipps (Eds.), Equity in the classroom. Falmer Press/UNESCO Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helle, L., Tynjala, P., & Olkinuora, E. (2006). Project-based learning in post-secondary education—theory, practice and rubber sling shots. Higher Education, 51, 287–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt, J., & Solomon, F. (1996). Engineering education—The way ahead. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 7(1), 47–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, Inc. http://academic.regis.edu/ed205/kolb.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, J. E., & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Engineering education—is problem-based or project-based learning the answer? Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 11, 2–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, J., Ayre, M., Hands, D., & Carden, P. (2005). Learning about learning styles: Can it improve engineering education? MountainRise, 2(1), 145–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nepal, K. P., & Jenkins, G. A. (2011). Blending project-based learning and traditional lecture-tutorial based teaching approaches in engineering design courses, Proceedings of the 2011 AAEE Conference, Fremantle, Western Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nepal, K. P., & Panuwatwanich, K. (2011). Comparative study of project-based learning and traditional lecture tutorial teaching approaches in undergraduate engineering courses, Proceedings of the 2011 AAEE Conference, Fremantle, Western Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nepal, K. P., & Stewart, R. A. (2010). Relationship between self-directed learning readiness factors and learning outcomes in third year project-based engineering design course, Proceedings of the 2010 AAEE Conference, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrenet, J. C., Bouhuijs, P. A. J., & Smits, J. G. M. M. (2000). The suitability of problem-based learning for engineering education: Theory and practice. Teaching in Higher Education, 5(3), 345–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ribeiro, L. R. C., & Mizukami, M. G. N. (2005). Problem-based learning: A student evaluation of an implementation in postgraduate engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 30, 137–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shanableh, A., & Omar, M. (2007). Shaping engineering education in the Middle East—a report on four engineering education conferences held at the University of Sharjah. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 6(2), 313–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spalding, B., Ferguson, S., Garrigan, P., & Stewart, R. (1999). How effective is group work in enhancing work-based learning? An evaluation of an education studies course. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 23(1), 109–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinhorst, K., & Keeler, C. M. (1995). Developing material for introductory statistics courses from a conceptual active learning viewpoint. Journal of Statistics Education, 3(3) [online].

    Google Scholar 

  • Stice, J. E. (1987). Using KoIb’s learning cycle to improve student learning. Engineering Education, 77(5), 291–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning, The Autodesk Foundation, California. http://www.autodesk.com/foundation.

  • Thomas, J. W., Mergendoller, J. R., & Michaelson, A. (1999). Project-based learning: A handbook for middle and high school teachers. Novato: The Buck Institute for Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, A. (2001). British psychology students—perceptions of group-work and peer assessment. Psychology Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 28–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willey, K., & Gardner, A. (2009). Developing team skills with self- and peer assessment: Are benefits inversely related to team function? Campus-Wide Information Systems, 26(5), 365–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yam, L. H. S., & Burger, P. (2009). Student engagement and teacher’s ‘self’: A case study of inclusive teaching’, 15th Annual Conference of the Pacific Rim Real Estate Society, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yam, L. H. S., & Rossini, P. (2010). Implementing a Project-Based Learning Approach in an Introductory Property Course, 16th Annual Conference of the Pacific Rim Real Estate Society Conference, January 2010, New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author is grateful to the Center of Excellence in Teaching and Learning (CETL), UAEU for providing their survey results and for the permission to use their survey results in this book chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, PO Box 15551, United Arab Emirates

    Rezaul K. Chowdhury

Authors
  1. Rezaul K. Chowdhury
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rezaul K. Chowdhury .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Qatar University, Doha, Qatar

    Mahmoud Abdulwahed

  2. Qatar University, Doha, Qatar

    Mazen O. Hasna

  3. Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA

    Jeffrey E. Froyd

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chowdhury, R. (2016). Potential and Challenges of Project-Based Learning in Engineering Education at the United Arab Emirates University. In: Abdulwahed, M., Hasna, M., Froyd, J. (eds) Advances in Engineering Education in the Middle East and North Africa. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15323-0_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15323-0_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15322-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15323-0

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation