• Cecilia GriecoEmail author
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Business book series (BRIEFSBUSINESS)


The purpose of this chapter is to introduce the topic of the analysis and illustrate how the overall book is going to develop. It highlights why the practice of social impact assessment is strategic for social enterprises. As for the key role that social mission plays in this kind of organizations, they have to find a way to measure and monitor the fulfillment of this mission. From this perspective, assessing social impact has both internal and external benefit: it allows to assess resources allocation and to keep stakeholders informed about achieved results. The chapter also explains some of the main barriers that could hamper the implementation of the process. The specificities of social enterprises pose the need for suited models to assess this kind of impact, as financial measurement standards are unsuitable to track social and environmental outcomes. However, a wide range of models exist that can help managers driving the process. Finally the structure of the remaining chapters is outlined.


Social entrepreneurship Social mission Social impact assessment Models Self-assessment 


  1. Austin, J., Stevenson, H., & Wei-Skillern, J. (2006). Social and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different, or both? Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 30(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bacq, S., & Janssen, F. (2011). The multiple faces of social entrepreneurship: A review of definitional issues based on geographical and thematic criteria. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 23(5–6), 373–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Epstein, M. J., & Buhovac, A. R. (2014). Making sustainability work: Best practices in managing and measuring corporate social, environmental, and economic impacts. Sheffield: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.Google Scholar
  4. Grimes, M. (2010). Strategic sense making within funding relationships: The effects of performance measurement on organizational identity in the social sector. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(4), 763–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Meadows, M., & Pike, M. (2010). Performance management for social enterprises. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 23(2), 127–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Nicholls, A. (2009). We do good things, don’t we?: Blended value accounting in social entrepreneurship. Accounting Organizations and Society, 34, 755–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. OECD. (2010). SMEs, entrepreneurship and innovation.,3746,en_2649_33956792_44938128_1_1_1_1,00.html.
  8. Richmond, B. J., Mook, L., & Quarter, J. (2003). Social accounting for non profits: Two models. Non-profit Management and Leadership, 13(4), 308–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Smith, B. R., & Stevens, C. E. (2010). Different types of social entrepreneurship: The role of geography and embeddedness on the measurement and scaling of social value. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 22(6), 575–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Yunus, M. (2008). A world without poverty: Social business and the future of capitalism. New York, USA: Public Affairs.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Libera Università Maria Ss. Assunta (LUMSA)RomeItaly

Personalised recommendations