Abstract
Beginning from a series of miscommunications, misunderstandings and seemingly incongruous connections, this chapter explores how three trans- or interdisciplinary areas of research might meet. By exploring the way that cattle are depicted in trade magazines, the chapter discusses how perspectives informed by gender studies, animal studies and rural development might examine how animals are both mirrors of rural gender relations and active in them. Such meetings of different perspectives might help to build towards more sustainable rural futures as they challenge the way that gendered narratives have implications for individual farmers. In addition the chapter points to ways that these narratives have material impacts as animal caretaking and the bodies of individual animals are shaped in response to these gendered narratives.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Unfortunately Genus Breeding Ltd. has not given permission to reprint images from their catalogues. However, their catalogues are available online and the specific images are available from the author.
- 2.
Haraway (2008) highlights the zoonotic implications of H5N1 in global systems of production and consumption. Equally Stassart and Whatmore (2003) identify how food scares highlight the ‘metabolic intimacies’ between species and animal agency in bridging trust between systems of production and consumption.
- 3.
See, for example, Garry Marvin’s interesting account of Being Human in the Bullfight (2007) that identifies the significance of the battle between nature and culture within the corrida (both the bullfight itself and the arena). The victory of the matador over the bull is indicative of the conquest of intelligence over strength (Page 203) and the cultured, restrained urban over the unruly and wild rural space, a conquest made all the more significant through the bringing of the wild bull into the urban space where the corrida is located (page 199).
- 4.
Equally the direction is not important bodies that define spaces which shape discourse, which defines bodies.
References
Adams, C. J. (2003). The pornography of meat. New York: Continuum.
Agamben, G. (2004). The open. Man and Animal (trans: Attell, K.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Bear, C. (2006). Salmon by numbers: Quantification and understandings of nature. Scottish Geographical Journal, 122, 185–203.
Bell, D. (2007). Feral masculinities: Urban versus rural in City Slickers and Hunters Blood. In R. Fish (Ed.), Cinematic countrysides (Inside popular film). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Birke, L. (2002). Intimate familiarities? Feminism and human-animal studies. Society and Animals, 10, 429–436.
Brandth, B. (2006). Agricultural body-building: Incorporations of gender, body and work. Journal of Rural Studies, 22, 17–27.
Bryld, M. M., & Lykke, N. (Eds.). (2000). Cosmodolphins: Feminist cultural studies of technology, animals and the sacred. London: Zed Books.
Bull, J. (2011). Encountering fish, flows and waterscapes through angling. Environment and Planning A, 43, 2267–2284.
Buller, H. (2004). Where the wild things are: The evolving iconography of rural fauna. Journal of Rural Studies, 20, 131–141.
Butler, J. (2004). Undoing gender. Abingdon: Routledge.
Coldwell, I. (2007). New farming masculinities: ‘More than just shit-kickers’, we’re ‘switched-on’ farmers wanting to balance lifestyle, sustainability and coin. Journal of Sociology, 43, 87–103.
DEFRA. (2003). Code of recommendations for the welfare of livestock: Cattle. London: DEFRA.
Donovan, J., & Adams, C. J. (2007). The feminist care tradition in animal ethics. New York: Columbia University Press.
Folker, M. P., Svendsen, M. N., & Koch, L. (2009). Lifeworlds of the pig: Towards a cartography of porcine/human entanglements. In H. Tora (Ed.), Investigating human/animal relations in science, culture and work (Crossroads of knowledge, no. 10, pp. 142–153). Uppsala: Uppsala University.
Fortwangler, C. (2009). A place for the donkey: Natives and aliens in the US Virgin Islands. Landscape Research, 34, 205–222.
Fox, R. (2006). Animal behaviours, post-human lives – Everyday negotiations of the animal-human divide in pet-keeping. Social and Cultural Geography, 7, 525–537.
Fox, R., & Walsh, K. (2011). Furry belongings: Pets, migration and home. In J. Bull (Ed.), Animal movements: Moving animals (Crossroads of knowledge, no. 17, pp. 97–117). Uppsala: Centre for Gender Research, Uppsala University.
Gary, M. (2007). Being human in the bullfight. In L. Kalof & A. Fitzgerald (Eds.), The animals reader: The essential classic and contemporary writings (pp. 197–208). Oxford: Berg.
Gould, S. J. (1996). The mismeasure of man (2nd, Rev. ed.). New York: W.W. Norton & Co.
Grassini, C. (2005). Designer cows:The practices of cattle breeding between skill and standardisation. Society and Animals, 13, 33–49.
Grassini, C. (2007). Managing cows: An ethnography of breeding practices and uses of reproductive technology in contemporary dairy farming in Lombardy (Italy). Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 38, 488–510.
Haraway, D. (2008). When species meet. Minesota: University of Minnesota Press.
Haraway, D. (2012). Awash in urine: DES and Premarin® in multispecies response-ability. Women’s Studies Quarterly, 40, 301–317.
Haraway, D., & Goodeve, T. N. (1998). How like a leaf: An interview with Donna J. Haraway. New York: Routledge Press.
Hatley, J. (2011). Blood intimacies and biodicy: Keeping faith with ticks. Australian Humanities Review, 50, 63–76.
Hinchliffe, S., & Bingham, N. (2008). Securing life: The emerging practices of biosecurity. Environment and Planning A, 40, 1534–1551.
Hinchliffe, S., & Whatmore, S. (2006). Living cities: Towards a politics of conviviality. Science as Culture, 15, 123–138.
Holloway, L., & Morris, C. (2008). Boosted bodies: Genetic techniques, domestic livestock bodies and complex representations of life. Geoforum, 39, 1709–1720.
Holloway, L., & Morris, C. (2012). Contesting genetic knowledge practices in livestock breeding: Biopower, biosocial collectivities and heterogeneous resistances. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 30, 60–77.
Holloway, L., Morris, C., Gilna, B., & Gibbs, D. (2011). Choosing and rejecting cattle and sheep: Changing discourses of (de)selection in pedigree livestock breeding. Agriculture and Human Values, 28, 533–547.
Holmberg, T. (2011). Mortal love. Care practices in animal experimentation. Feminist Theory, 12, 147–163.
Holmberg, T., & Ideland, M. (2010). Dilemman med transgena djur – forskningspraktik och etik. Uppsala: Crossroad of Knowledge Series Centre for Gender Research, Uppsala University.
Jerolmack, C. (2007). Animal practices, ethnicity, and community: The Turkish pigeon handlers of Berlin. American Sociological Review, 72, 874–894.
Matless, D., Merchant, P., & Watkins, C. (2005). Animal landscapes: Otters and wildfowl in England 1945–1970. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 30, 191–205.
McHugh, S. (2011). Animal stories: Narrating across species lines. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Merchant, C. (1989). The death of nature: Women, ecology, and the scientific revolution. San Francisco: Harper & Row.
Nordström Källström, H. (2008). Mellan trivsel och ensamhet: om sociala villkor i lantbruket (Acta Universitatis agriculturae Sueciae:74). Uppsala: Doktorsavhandling. Institutionen för stad och land, SLU.
Peter, G., Bell, M. M., & Jarnagin, S. (2000). Coming back across the fence: Masculinity and the transition to sustainable agriculture. Rural Sociology, 65, 215–233.
Potts, A., & White, M. (2008). New Zealand vegetarians: At odds with their nation. Society and Animals, 16, 336–353.
Redmalm, D. (2013). Holy bonsai wolves: Chihuahuas and the Paris Hilton syndrome. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 16, 1–17.
Riley, M., & Harvey, D. (2007). Landscape conservation, farm practice and the meaning of the countryside: An oral history approach. Social and Cultural Geography, 8, 391–416.
Rudy, K. (2012). Loving animals: Toward a new animal advocacy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Sanders, C. R. (2003). Actions speak louder than words: Close relationships between humans and nonhuman animals. Symbolic Interaction, 26, 405–426.
Saugeres, L. (2002). The cultural representation of the farming landscape: Masculinity, power and nature. Journal of Rural Studies, 18, 373–384.
Schupbach, W. (1982). The paradox of Rembrandt’s ‘anatomy of Dr. Tulp’. London: Wellcome Institute for the History of Medicine.
Soil Association. (2011). Producer support: Organic beef and dairy production. Bristol: Soil Association.
Stassart, P., & Whatmore, S. (2003). Metabolising risk: Food scares and the un/re-making of Belgian beef. Themed ‘alternative food networks’ issue of Environment and Planning A, 35(3), 449–462.
von Linne, C. (1740). Systema naturæ (2nd ed.). Stockholm: Keiswetter.
Whatmore, S. (2002). Hybrid geographies: Natures cultures spaces. London: Sage.
Wilmot, S. (2007). From ‘public service’ to artificial insemination: Animal breeding science and reproductive research in early 20th century Britain. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 38, 411–441.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bull, J. (2016). Images of Cows, Stories of Gender. In: Bull, J., Fahlgren, M. (eds) Illdisciplined Gender. Crossroads of Knowledge. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15272-1_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15272-1_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15271-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15272-1
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)