Skip to main content

Public Management as a Building Block for Governance: Drawing on the Experiences of Hong Kong

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Governance in South, Southeast, and East Asia

Part of the book series: Public Administration, Governance and Globalization ((PAGG,volume 15))

Abstract

Developing countries strive for good governance because it ensures a number of features and arrangements that contribute to an effective and equitable system for governing. Despite substantial investments in resources and reorganization, the limited capacity of developing countries hinders the achievement of governance. An alternative approach could be to aim for attaining the desired outcome of governance by carefully designing and effectively implementing programs of public management with a limited scope, and by building the framework of governance gradually. This chapter discusses the case of Hong Kong in order to demonstrate that public management programs can serve as building blocks for creating a framework of governance; over time, the integration of these efforts can help ensure the benefits of governance without undertaking enormous risks by attempting comprehensive changes that may not succeed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    I do not mean to imply that there are no problems related to implementing private sector features in the public sector. Some of these are discussed by Haroon Khan (Chap. 8 in this volume) and Mei Li (Chap. 12 in this volume).

References

  • Ahrens, J. (2001). Governance, conditionality and transformation in post-socialist countries. In H. Hoen (Ed.), Good governance in Central and Eastern Europe (pp. 54–90). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, M. (2013). The limits of institutional reform in develiopment: Changing rules for realistic solutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bekke, H., Kickert, W., & Kooiman, J. (1995). Public management and governance. In W. Kickert & F. A. van Vught (Eds.), Public policy and administration sciences in the Netherlands (pp. 201–218). London: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevir, M. (2009). Key concepts in governance. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevir, M. (2011). Governance as theory, practice and dilemma. In M. Bevir (Ed.), The Sage handbook of governance (pp. 1–16). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, B., & Joypaul, S. K. (1993). The mauritian senior public service since independence: Some lessons for developing and developed nations. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 59(3), 423–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frischtak, L. (1994). Governance capacity and economic reform in developing countries. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, A. A. (1999). Africa’s overgrown state reconsidered: Bureaucracy and economic growth. World Politics, 51(4), 520–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grindle, M. S. (2004). Good enough governance: Poverty reduction and reform in developing countries. Governance, 17(4), 525–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grindle, M. S. (2011). Good enough governance revisited. Development Policy Review, 29(S1), S199–S221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong Kong Government. (1995). The five-year plan for social welfare development in Hong Kong: Review 1995. Hong Kong: Government Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong Kong Government. (2010). Hong Kong 2010. http://www.yearbook.gov.hk/2010/en/index.html. Accessed 20 June 2012.

  • Hong Kong Government, Finance Branch. (1989). Public sector reform. Hong Kong: Government Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hope, K. R. (2006). Capacity development and good governance. In A. S. Huque & H. Zafarullah (Eds.), International development governance (pp. 587–598). London: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hope, K. R., & Hamdock, A. (2002). Guidelines for enhancing good economic and corporate governance in Africa. Addis Ababa: United Nations Economic Commission for Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, O. (1998). Public administration and management: An introduction (2nd ed.). Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huque, A. S. (2002). Government-society relations and the politics of administrative reform in Hong Kong. Public Policy and Administration, 17(1), 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huque, A. S., Lee, G., & Cheung, A. B. L. (1998). The civil service in Hong Kong: Continuity and change. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (1996). Partnership in greater Manchester and the Thames Gateway. Paper presented at DoE Seminar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2012). The worldwide governance indicators: Methodology and analytical issues. http://info.worldbank.org/gocernance/wgi/index.asp. Accessed 14 Aug 2014.

  • Lee, G., & Huque, A. S. (1996). Hong Kong: Administrative reform and recent public sector changes. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 55(4), 13–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehoucq, F. E. (2005). Costa Rica: Paradise in doubt. Journal of Democracy, 16(3), 140–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levi-Faur, D. (Ed.). (2012). Oxford handbook of governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, L. E., Jr. (2012). The many faces of governance: Adaptation? Transformation? Both? Neither? In D. Levi-Faur (Ed.), Oxford handbook of governance (pp. 49–64). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, L. E., Jr., Heinrich, C. J., & Hill, C. J. (2000). Studying governance and public management: Why? How? In C. J. Heinrich & L. E. Lynn Jr. (Eds.), Governance and performance: New perspective (pp. 1–33). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nossal, K. R. (2003). World politics: Global anarchy, global governance. In R. Dyck (Ed.), Studying politics (pp. 368–388). Toronto: Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B. G. (2002). The future of governing: Four emerging models. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B. G., & Pierre, J. (1998). Governance without government? Rethinking public administration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8(2), 223–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, C., & Bouckert, G. (2004). Public management reform: A comparative analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raphaeli, N., Roumani, J., & MacKeller, A. C. (1984). Public sector management in Botswana: Lessons in pragmatism. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). The new governance: Governing without government. Political Studies, 44(4), 652–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding governance: Policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarker, A. E. (2006). New public management in developing countries: An analysis of success and failure with particular reference to Singapore and Bangladesh. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 19(2), 180–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, I. (1986). Policymaking in a turbulent environment: The case of Hong Kong. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 52(1), 447–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonet, D. (2008). The new public management theory and european healthcare reforms. Canadian Public Administration, 51(4), 617–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoker, G. (1998). Governance as theory: Five propositions. International Social Science Journal, 50(1), 17–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoker, G. (2011). Was local governance such a good idea? A global comparative perspective. Public Administration, 89(1), 15–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Program. (1997). Governance for sustainable development. New York: UNDP.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Program. (2007). Governance indicators: A users’ guide (2nd ed). New York: UNDP.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (1991) Managing development: The governance dimension. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (1992). Governance and development. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • World Governance Index. (2013). http://info.worldbank.org/gocernance/wgi/index.asp. Accessed 23 Aug 2014.

  • Zafarullah, H., & Huque, A. S. (2006). Understanding development governance: Concepts, institutions, and processes. In A. S. Huque & H. Zafarullah (Eds.), International development governance (pp. 13–50). New York: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zafarullah, H., & Huque, A. S. (2012). Managing development in a globalized world: Concepts, processes, institutions. New York: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zumbansen, P. (2012). An interdisciplinary perspective. In D. Levi-Faur (Ed.), Oxford handbook of governance (pp. 83–98). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmed Shafiqul Huque .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Huque, A. (2015). Public Management as a Building Block for Governance: Drawing on the Experiences of Hong Kong. In: Jamil, I., Aminuzzaman, S., Haque, S. (eds) Governance in South, Southeast, and East Asia. Public Administration, Governance and Globalization, vol 15. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15218-9_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics