Skip to main content

Network Governance and Policy Making: Developments and Directions in Asia

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Public Administration, Governance and Globalization ((PAGG,volume 15))

Abstract

Network governance is conceived of as horizontally organized social subsystems with sensibilities and rationalities that are expected to influence policy development and contribute to policy evaluation. In Asia, policy networks exist and operate within civil society in various forms, and they exhibit common or dissimilar attributes. Evidence suggests that notable breakthroughs have been achieved in some of these countries and in specific development sectors, but there is a lack of coherence and consistency in the way network governance works. Lessons from successful enterprises can be drawn and applied to situations where headway has been constrained by social, political, and bureaucratic factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agere, S. (2000). Promoting good governance: Principles, practices and perspectives. London: Commonwealth Secretariat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2001). Big questions in public network management research. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11(3), 295–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alten, F. (1995). The role of government in the Singapore economy. Berlin: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aspinall, E. (2004). Indonesia: Transformation of civil society and democratic breakthrough. In M. Alagappa (Ed.), Civil society and political change in Asia: Expanding and contracting democratic space (pp. 61–96). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballegoyen, A. F. V. (2000). Roll back malaria: A WHO initiated network in the fight against malaria. New York: UN Global Public Policy Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behar, A., & Prakash, A. (2004). India: Expanding and contracting democratic space. In M. Alagappa (Ed.), Civil society and political change in Asia: Expanding and contracting democratic space (pp. 191–122, 203). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • BEN. (2008). Progress report 2005–2008. Dhaka: Bangladesh ECD Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertelsmann Stiftung, BTI. (2012a). Malaysia country report. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung. http://www.bti-project.org/bti-home/. Accessed 2 Nov 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertelsmann Stiftung, BTI. (2012b). Indonesia country report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertelsmann Stiftung, BTI. (2012c). Thailand country report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertelsmann Stiftung, BTI. (2012d). Singapore country report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertelsmann Stiftung, BTI. (2012e). China country report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertelsmann Stiftung, BTI. (2012f). India country report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertelsmann Stiftung, BTI. (2012g) Pakistan country report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertelsmann Stiftung, BTI. (2012h). Bangladesh country report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierling, J., & Lafferty, G. (1998). Pressures for change: Capitalist development and democracy. In R. Maidment, D. Goldblatt, & J. Mitchell (Eds.), Governance in the Asia-Pacific region (pp. 275–300). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgoyary, M. (2006). Understanding the role of networks as connecters in bridging the research policy gap in participatory forest policy development in India’. JBICI Discussion Paper, No. 12 Tokyo: Japan Bank for International Cooperation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouckaert, G., Peters, B. G., & Verhoest, K. (2010). The coordination of public sector organizations. Shifting patterns of public management. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Case, W. (1993). Semi-democracy in Malaysia: Withstanding the pressures for regime change. Pacific Affairs, 66(2), 183–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Case, W. (2001). Politics in Southeast Asia: Democracy or less? London: Curzon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2000). Materials for an exploratory theory of the network society. British Journal of Sociology, 51(1), 5–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conteh, C. (2009). Network governance of private sector development policy implementation in Singapore. Asian Journal of Political Science, 17(1), 71–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornwall, A., & Gaventa, J. (2006). Participation in governance. In A. S. Huque & H. Zafarullah (Eds.), International development governance (pp. 405–413). London: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECD. (2012). Bangladesh ECD Network: About the Network. http://www.ecd-bangladesh.net/about_ecd.asp. Accessed 12 Dec 2013.

  • Franco, J. C. (2004). The Philippines: Fractious civil society and competing visions of democracy’. In M. Alagappa (Ed.),Civil society and political change in Asia: Expanding and contracting democratic space (pp. 97–137). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulda, A., Li, Y., & Song, Q. (2012). New strategies of civil society in China: A case study of the network governance approach. Journal of Contemporary China, 21(76), 675–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, M. E. (2004). China: The limits of civil society in a late Leninist state. In M. Alagappa (Ed.), Civil society and political change in Asia: Expanding and contracting democratic space (pp. 419–452). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, A. (2000). Reforming the health sector in Thailand: The role of policy actors on the policy state. International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 15(1), 39–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guan, L. H. (2004). Introduction: Civil society in Southeast Asia. In L. H. Guan (Ed.), Civil society in Southeast Asia (pp. 1–26). Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ha, Y., Joo, J., Kang, M., Lah, T. J., & Jang, J. (2009). Social conflicts and policy-making in Korea: Interpretation of policy failures through a public discourse perspective. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 75(4), 649–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hajer, M., & Wagenaar, H. (2003). Introduction. In M. Hajer & H. Wagenaar (Eds.), Deliberative policy analysis: Understanding governance in the network society (pp. 1–30). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Huque, A. S., & Zafarullah, H. (Eds.). (2006). International development governance. Boca Raton: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Junki, K. (2006). Networks, network governance, and networked networks. International Review of Public Administration, 11(1), 19–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kadir, S. (2004). Singapore: Engagement and autonomy within the political status quo. In M. Alagappa (Ed.), Civil society and political change in Asia: Expanding and contracting democratic space (pp. 324–354). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kickert, W. J. M., Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. F. M. (Eds.). (1997). Managing complex networks: Strategies for the public sector. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S. (2004). South Korea: Confrontational legacy and democratic contributions. In M. Alagappa (Ed.), Civil society and political change in Asia: Expanding and contracting democratic space (pp. 138–163). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kooiman, J. (1999). Social-political governance: Overview, reflections and design. Public Management: An International Journal of Research and Theory, 1(1), 67–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koppenjan, J. F. M., & Klijn, E. H. (2004). Managing uncertainties in networks: A network approach to problem solving and decision making. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozul-Wright, R., & Rayment, P. (2007). The resistible rise of market fundamentalism: The struggle for economic development in a global economy. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, S. (2002). Does ‘Participation’ in common pool resource management help the poor? a social cost-benefit analysis of joint forest management in Jharkhand, India’. World Development, 30(5), 63–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T. (2002). The politics of civil society in Singapore. Asian Studies Review, 26(1), 97–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Llanto, G. M. (2007). The Policy Development Process and the Agenda for Effective Institutions: The Philippines. EABER Working Paper Series, No. 24. East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauzy, D. K., & Milne R. S. (2002). Singapore politics under the people’s action party. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Park, H. J., & Park M. J. (2009). Types of network governance and network performance: Community development project case. International Review of Public Administration, 13(special issue), 91–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parnini, S.Y. (2007). Civil society and good governance in Bangladesh. Asian Journal of Political Science, 14(2), 189–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelon, N. J. P. (1999). Review of the policy process in Bangladesh following ICPD. Dhaka: Population Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkin, E., & Court, J. (2005). Networks and policy processes in international development. London: Overseas Development Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • RBM. (2011). Annual report of the Roll Back Malaria Partnership 2011. Geneva: WHO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinicke, W.H., & Deng, F.M (2000). Critical choices: The United Nations, networks, and the future of global governance. Washington DC: The Global Public Policy Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R.A.W. (1997). Understanding governance: Policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, A. (2004). Pakistan: Civil society in the service of an authoritarian state. in M. Alagappa (Ed.), Civil society and political change in Asia: Expanding and contracting democratic space (pp. 357–388). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2005). Network governance and post-liberal democracy. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 27(2), 197–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tantivess, S., & Waltt, G. (2008). The role of state and non-state sectors in the policy process: The contribution of policy networks to the scale-up of antiretroviral therapy in Thailand’, Health Policy and Planning, 23(5), 328–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teets, J.C. (2011). Evolution of the policy process in China: The impact of the color revolutions and global economic crisis on civil society participation in public policy. Harvard Asia Quarterly, 13(1), 41.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN. (2008). People matter: Civil engagement in public governance—World public sector report. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP. (2014). Human development report: Sustaining human progress: Reducing vulnerabilities and building resilience. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valkama, P., Bailey, S. J., & Anttiroiko, A.V. (2013). Organizational innovation in public services: Forms and governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, M. L. (2006). Protest and possibilities: Civil society and coalitions for political change in Malaysia. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, D. (20–22 August 2009). Network Governance and Democracy: Can Grassroots Participation Influence National Policy Orientation? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the RC19 of the International Sociological Association, Montreal, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (1992). Governance and development. Washington DC: World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zafarullah, H. (2004). Decentralized governance and participatory development: The asian experience. In G. M. Mudacumura & M. S. Haque (Eds.), Handbook of development policy studies (pp. 645–673). New York: Marcel Dekker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zafarullah, H., & Huque, A. S. (2012). Managing development in a globalized world: Concepts, processes, institutions. Boca Raton: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, H., Jong, M., & Koppenjan, J. (2010). Applying policy network theory to policy-making in China: The case of urban health insurance reform’. Public Administration, 88(2), 398–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Habib Zafarullah .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zafarullah, H. (2015). Network Governance and Policy Making: Developments and Directions in Asia. In: Jamil, I., Aminuzzaman, S., Haque, S. (eds) Governance in South, Southeast, and East Asia. Public Administration, Governance and Globalization, vol 15. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15218-9_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics