Skip to main content

Effective Control of a Six Degree of Freedom Shake Table

  • Conference paper

Abstract

Real-Time Hybrid Substructuring (RTHS) is a new method of vibration testing that can be used to effectively characterize the system level performance of mechanical equipment. RTHS allows mechanical equipment to be physically tested while coupled through what is called a transfer system to a real-time numerical simulation of the support structure. The challenge in applying RTHS to test mechanical equipment is twofold: the equipment itself can have little inherent damping which, coupled with the inherent dynamics in the transfer system, can result in unstable RTHS tests; and the interface at the attachment points can be complex with multi-directional and rotational motion and reactions which adds significant complexity to the RTHS transfer system. To insure stability and accurately represent the complex interface between the physical and numerical substructures, a high fidelity multiple-input-multiple-output (MIMO) servo-hydraulic actuator system is needed for the RTHS transfer system. This paper presents a methodology to achieve effective control of a six degree-of-freedom (6DOF) shake table and describes the corresponding MIMO system identification and model-based feedforward feedback compensation to facilitate both stable and accurate RTHS testing of lightly damped mechanical systems. Results show that the proposed compensation method can improve the magnitude and phase tracking of a 6DOF shake table located at the University of Connecticut.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Nakashima M, Masaoka N (1999) Real time on-line test for MDOF systems. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 28:393–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Darby AP, Blakeborough A, Williams MS (1999) Real time substructure test using hydraulic actuator. J Eng Mech 125(10):1133–1139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dimig J, Shield C, French C, Bailey F, Clark A (1999) Effective force testing: a method of seismic simulation for structural testing. J Struct Eng 125(9):1028–1037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Horiuchi T, Inoue M, Konno T, Namita Y (1999) Real time hybrid experimental system with actuator delay compensation and it’s applications to a piping system with energy absorber. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 28(10):1121–1141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Christenson R, Lin YZ (2008) Real time hybrid simulation of a seismically excited structure with large scale magneto rheological fluid dampers. In: Hybrid simulation theory, implementation and applications. Taylor & Francis, London

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jiang Z, Kim SJ, Plude S, Christenson R (2013) Real time hybrid simulation of a complex bridge model with MR dampers using the convolution integral method. J Smart Mater Struct 22(10):105008

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hanselmann H (1993) Hardware-in-the loop simulation as a standard approach for development, customization, and production test of ECU’s. SAE technical paper, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  8. Isermann R, Schaffnit J, Sinsel S (1999) Hardware-in-the-loop simulation for the design and testing of engine-control systems. Control Eng Pract 7(5):643–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bouscayrol A (2008) Different types of hardware-in-the-loop simulation for electric drives. Industrial Electronics, pp 2146–2151

    Google Scholar 

  10. Carmeli MS, Castelli-Dezzaa F, Mauri M, Marchegiani G (2013) Novel mechanical hardware in the loop platform for distributed generation systems. Distrib Gener Altern Energy J 28(3):7–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fathy HK, Ahlawat R, Stein JL (2005) Proper powertrain modeling for engine-in-the-loop simulation. ASME 2005 international mechanical engineering congress and exposition, pp 1195–1201

    Google Scholar 

  12. Filipi Z, Fathy H, Hagena J, Knafl A, Ahlawat R, Liu J, Jung D, Assanis D, Peng H, Stein J (2006) Engine-in-the-loop testing for evaluating hybrid propulsion concepts and transient emissions-HMMWV case study. AE technical paper

    Google Scholar 

  13. Filipi Z, Kim YJ (2010) Hydraulic hybrid propulsion for heavy vehicles: combining the simulation and engine-in-the-loop techniques to maximize the fuel economy and emission benefits. Oil Gas Sci Technol (Revue de l’Institut Francais du Petrole) 65(1):155–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jung RY, Shing PB (2006) Performance evaluation of a real time pseudodynamic test system. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 35(7):789–810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen C, Ricles JM (2010) Tracking error based servohydraulic actuator adaptive compensation for real time hybrid simulation. J Struct Eng 10:432–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Carrion JE, Spencer B (2007) Model based strategies for real time hybrid testing. NSEL report no NSEL-006

    Google Scholar 

  17. Phillips BM, Spencer BF (2011) Model based servo hydraulic control for real time hybrid simulation. Newmark Structural Engineering Laboratory report number NSE-028. University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

    Google Scholar 

  18. Phillips BM, Spencer BF (2012) Model-based multiactuator control for real-time hybrid simulation. J Eng Mech 139(2):219–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gao X, Castaneda N, Dyke SJ (2013) Experimental validation of a generalized procedure for MDOF real-time hybrid simulation. J Eng Mech 140(4):04013006

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nakata N, Spencer B, Elnashai A (2007) Multi-dimensional mixed-mode hybrid simulation control and applications. Newmark Structural Engineering Laboratory/University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illionis

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bendat JS, Piersol AG (2011) Random data: analysis and measurement procedures. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The work is supported by the Office of Naval Research under project DOD/NAVY/ONR, Award No. N00014-11-1-0260, Program Director Deborah Nalchajian, Code 331.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph A. Franco III .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Franco, J.A., Botelho, R.M., Christenson, R.E. (2015). Effective Control of a Six Degree of Freedom Shake Table. In: Allen, M., Mayes, R., Rixen, D. (eds) Dynamics of Coupled Structures, Volume 4. Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15209-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15209-7_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15208-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15209-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics