Skip to main content

Quantifying Epistemic and Aleatoric Uncertainty in the Ampair 600 Wind Turbine

  • Conference paper
Dynamics of Coupled Structures, Volume 4

Abstract

Determining the uncertainty in a mechanical joint is very important and very difficult. This paper presents two methods of determining the uncertainty in the joint: maximum entropy approach and sampling methods. Maximum entropy is an approach that can quantify the aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty independently. This approach is applied on a rigid connection of the Ampair 600 Wind Turbine and shows that the epistemic uncertainty of the system is very high. Sampling methods are used on an simplified representation of the wind turbine as a lumped mass approximation. The sampling methods are able to treat the joint in a nonlinear sense by using a discrete four-parameter Iwan model as the joint model. This is able to predict accurately the data within the uncertainty bounds when considering epistemic uncertainty. The Iwan joint model is then implemented on the high fidelity model and preliminary results are presented.

Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory managed and operated by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporations, for the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration under Contract DE-AC04-94AL85000.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Soize C (2001) Maximum entropy approach for modeling random uncertainties in transient elastodynamics. J Acoust Soc Am 5:1979–1994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Soize C (2004) Random matrix theory for modeling uncertainties in computational mechanics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 194: 1333–1366

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Soize C (2010) Generalized probabilistic approach of uncertainties in computational dynamics using random matrices and polynomial chaos decompositions. Int J Numer Methods Eng 81:939–970

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Bonney MS, Brake MRW (2014) Utilizing Soize’s approach to identify parameter and model uncertainties, SAND2014-19209. Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque

    Google Scholar 

  5. Batou A, Soize C, Audebert S (2014) Model identification in computational stochastic dynamics using experimental modal data. Mech Syst Signal Process 50–51: 307–322. https://www.hal-upec-upem.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00989208

  6. Wang XQ, Mignolet MP (2014) Stochastic Iwan-type model of a bolted joint: formulation and identification. In: Proceedings of the 24th international modal analysis conference, 2014, pp 752–760

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gross J, Oberhardt T, Reuss P, Gaul L (2014) Model updating of the Ampair wind turbine substructures. In: Proceedings of the 32th international modal analysis conference

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mayes RL (2012) An introduction to the SEM substructures focus group test bed - the Ampair 600 wind turbine. In: Proceedings of the 30th international modal analysis conference

    Google Scholar 

  9. Allen MS, Blecke J, Roettgen D (2014) A wiki for sharing substructuring methods measurements and information. In: Proceedings of the 32th international modal analysis conference

    Google Scholar 

  10. Segalman DJ (2010) A four-parameter Iwan model for lap-type joints. ASME J Appl Mech 72:752–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Edwards HC (2002) Sierra framework version 3: core services theory and design, SAND2002-3616. Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Hensley D, Mayes RL (2006) Extending SMAC to multiple references. In: Proceedings of the 24th international modal analysis conference, 2006, pp 220–230

    Google Scholar 

  13. Adams BB, Bohnhoff WJ, Dalbey KR, Eddy JP, Eldred MS, Gay DM, Haskell K, Hough PD, Swiler LP (2015) A multilevel parallel object-oriented framework for design optimizations, parameter estimation, uncertainty quantifications, and sensitivity analysis. Technical report SAND2010-2183

    Google Scholar 

  14. Allen MS, Mayes RL (2010) Estimating degree of nonlinearity in transient responses with zeroed early-time fast fourier transforms. Mech Syst Signal Process 24:2049–2064

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew R. W. Brake .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Robertson, B.A., Bonney, M.S., Gastaldi, C., Brake, M.R.W. (2015). Quantifying Epistemic and Aleatoric Uncertainty in the Ampair 600 Wind Turbine. In: Allen, M., Mayes, R., Rixen, D. (eds) Dynamics of Coupled Structures, Volume 4. Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15209-7_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15209-7_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15208-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15209-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics