Abstract
The Ampair 600 wind turbine assembly has been modified to suit as a benchmark structure in the pursuit of finding best practices for experimental substructure coupling of structural dynamic systems. Seven such systems have been assembled in test laboratories in Europe and in the USA. We scrutinize the dynamic behavior of the total assembly of three of those by vibration testing and compare the test outcome from seemingly identical assemblies. The aim is to support future component synthesis activities with high fidelity data and support future model validation. Comparisons are made by evaluating deviations of measured frequency response functions, the differences of identified structural eigenfrequencies and the correlation between eigenvector estimates. The testing is made in two parts. First, a partly assembled system, not including the hub and blades, is tested. This constitutes one possible and logical subsystem splitting that is likely to appear in future substructure synthesis efforts. In the second part, the full system assembly is tested. The test procedure, the test setup, the obtained test data and test data statistics are presented.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Hemez F, Doebling S (2001) Model validation and uncertainty quantification. In: Conference proceedings of the society for experimental mechanics, 19th IMAC
Ampair Energy Ltd (2012) Ampair wind, hydro and packaged power specialists. http://www.ampair.com/wind-turbines/ampair-600. Accessed 13 Mar 2013
Mayes RL (2012) An introduction to the sem substructures focus group test bed – the Ampair 600 wind turbine. In: Conference proceedings of the society for experimental mechanics series, 30th IMAC, a conference on structural dynamics
Rohe DP, Mayes RL (2013) Coupling of a bladed hub to the tower of the ampair 600 wind turbine using the transmission simulator method. In: Conference proceedings of the society for experimental mechanics series, 31th IMAC, a conference on structural dynamics
Rahimi S, de Klerk D, Rixen DJ (2013) The Ampair 600 wind turbine benchmark: results from the frequency based substructuring applied to the rotor assembly. In: Conference proceedings of the society for experimental mechanics series, 31th IMAC, a conference on structural dynamics
Macknelly D, Nurbhai M, Monk N (2013) Additional modal testing of turbine blades and the application of transmission simulator substructuring methodology for coupling. In: Conference proceedings of the society for experimental mechanics series, 31th IMAC, a conference on structural dynamics
Rohe DP (2012) Validation of experimental–analytical substructuring using the transmission simulator method. M.S. thesis, Engineering Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison. Marquardt D, An algorithm for least-squares estimation of nonlinear parameters. J Soc Indust Appl Math 11, 1963
SEM substructure focus group wiki [online]. http://substructure.engr.wisc.edu
Ljung L (1999) System identification: theory for the user, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs
McKelvey T, Akcay H, Ljung L (1996) Subspace-based multivariable system identification from frequency response data. IEEE Trans Autom Control 41:960–979
Yaghoubi V, Abrahamsson T (2012) Automated modal analysis based on frequency response function estimates, vol 5, Topics in modal analysis I. Springer, New York, pp 9–18
Yaghoubi V, Abrahamsson T (2014) Automated modal analysis based on statistical evaluation of frequency responses, vol 7, Topics in modal analysis. Springer, New York, pp 479–486
Harvie J, Avitabile P (2012) Comparison of some wind turbine blade tests in various configurations. In: Conference proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics series, 30th IMAC, a conference on structural dynamics, pp 73–79
Johansson A, Linderholt A, Abrahamsson T (2014) Model calibration and uncertainty of A600 wind turbine blades. In: Conference proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics series, 32nd IMAC, a conference and exposition on structural dynamics
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Linderholt, A., Abrahamsson, T., Johansson, A., Steinepreis, D., Reuss, P. (2015). A Comparison of the Dynamic Behavior of Three Sets of the Ampair 600 Wind Turbine. In: Allen, M., Mayes, R., Rixen, D. (eds) Dynamics of Coupled Structures, Volume 4. Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15209-7_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15209-7_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15208-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15209-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)