Abstract
Debt can be friend or foe when it comes to budget stabilization. While short-term debt may be used to bridge temporary cash shortfalls that arise from incongruent timing of revenue receipts and expenditure payments, most state and local governments have balanced budget requirements that restrict the use of short-term debt for current (or operating) budget expenditures. Long-term debt may be used to leverage operating resources to enhance infrastructure and long-term projects. Nevertheless, excessive amounts of long-term debt will increase the fixed costs associated with debt payments, which could reduce the stability of non-debt-related expenditures. This chapter focuses predominantly on the interaction of state and local long-term debt and budget expenditures. First, we discuss historical trends in the use of long-term debt by state and local governments. We then examine aggregate fiscal data from local governments by state to demonstrate the correlation of expenditure volatility with outstanding debt balances. We find that in 20 % of the states, expenditure volatility increases as debt increases.
The authors appreciate the research assistance of Danny Woodbury.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Source: Thomson Reuters (based on data available on April 8, 2014).
- 2.
Source: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Statistical Supplement to the Federal Reserve Bulletin, monthly. Z.1 report Table 104 (accessed online May 2014).
- 3.
The forecast volatility of debt service would be zero under the typical condition that interest rates on municipal securities are fixed by contract. Forecasting volatility on variable-rate debt is not zero, but comprises a relatively small portion of the market.
- 4.
For detailed calculation steps please see the Appendix.
- 5.
References
Bahl R, Duncombe W (1993) State and local debt burdens in the 1980s: a study in contrast. Public Adm Rev 53(1):31–40
Brealy RA, Myers SC (1996) Principles of corporate finance. McGraw-Hills, New York
Bunch BS (1991) The effect of constitutional debt limits on state governments use of public authorities. Public Choice 68(1–3):57–69
Capital Debt Affordability Committee State of Maryland (1996) Understanding and forecasting condition or ability to repay debt: report of the Capital Debt Affordability Committee on recommended debt authorizations for fiscal year 1993. In: Miller G (ed) Debt management. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 283–322
Clingermayer JC, Wood BD (1995) Disentangling patterns of state debt financing. Am Polit Sci Rev 89(1):108–120. doi:10.2307/2083078
Denison DV, Hackbart M, Moody M (2006) State debt limits how many are enough? Public Budg Finance 26(4):22–39
Denison DV, Hackbart M, Moody M. (2009) Intrastate Competition for Debt Resources. Public Finance Review 37(3):269–288
Fosu AK (2010) The external debt-servicing constraint and public-expenditure composition in Sub-Saharan Africa. Afr Dev Rev 22(3):378–393
Gabriel ZB, Marian D (2012) Public debt service and its impact on public expenditures. Rev Econ 4:655–664
Greiner A (2007) An endogenous growth model with public capital and sustainable government debt. Jpn Econ Rev 58(3):345–361
Hackbart MM, Leigland J (1990) State debt management policy: a national survey. Public Budg Finance 10(1):37–54
Hackbart M, Ramsey JR (1990) State debt level management: a stable credit rating model. Munic Finance J 11(1):79–96
Herrera S (2007) Public expenditure and growth. World Bank Publications, 4372. Washington
Hildreth WB, Miller GJ (2002) Debt and the local economy problems in benchmarking local government debt affordability. Public Budg Finance 22(4):99–113
Kiewiet DR, Szakaly K (1996) Constitutional limitations on borrowing: an analysis of state bonded indebtedness. J Law Econ Organ 12(1):62–97
Larkin R, Joseph JC (1996) Developing formal debt policies. In: Miller G (ed) Debt management. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 277–282
Lora E, Olivera M (2007) Public debt and social expenditure: friends or foes? Emerg Mark Rev 8(4):299–310
Martell CR (2007) Debt burdens of overlapping jurisdictions. Munic Finance J 28(2):1–23
McCubbins MD (1991) Party governance and US budget deficits: divided government and fiscal stalemate. In: Alesina A, Carliner G (eds) Politics and economics in the eighties. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
McCubbins MD, Kiewiet R (1991) The logic of delegation: congressional parties and the appropriations process. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Nice DC (1991) The impact of state policies to limit debt financing. Publius 21(1):69–82
Pogue TF (1970) The effect of debt limits: some new evidence. Natl Tax J 23(1):36–49
Ratchford BU (1938) American government and politics: constitutional provisions governing state borrowing. Am Polit Sci Rev 32(4):694–707
Robbins MD, Dungan C (2001) Debt diligence: how states manage the borrowing function. Public Budg Finance 21(2):88–105
Simonson B, Robbins MD, Brown R (2002) Debt affordability. In: Rabin J (ed) Encyclopedia of public administration and public policy. Marcel Dekker, New York, p 308
Smith C (1998) Measuring and forecasting debt capacity: the state of Oregon experience. Gov Finance Rev 14(6):52–55
The Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations (1962) Measures of state and local tax capacity, vol. Report M-16. Government Printing Office, Washington
White FC (1983) Trade-off in growth and stability in state taxes. Natl Tax J 36(1):103–114
Zimmerman D (1991) Private use of tax-exempt bonds: the controlling public subsidy of private activity. In: Readings in state and local public finance. The Urban Institute, Washington
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
Calculations for scenarios in Table 7.3
 | Revenue shortfall/increase | Revenue impact per dollar | Debt service | Net expenditures | Percent change in net expenditures |
A. Revenue and expenditure volatility with no debt | |||||
Expected revenue | 0.00 % | 1.00 | – | 1.00 | 0.00 % |
−10.00 % | 0.90 | – | 0.90 | −10.00 % | |
−5.00 % | 0.95 | – | 0.95 | −5.00 % | |
5.00 % | 1.05 | – | 1.05 | 5.00 % | |
10.00 % | 1.10 | – | 1.10 | 10.00 % | |
Standard deviation | 7.91 % | 0.08 | – | 0.08 | 7.91 % |
Average | 0.00 % | 1.00 | – | 1.00 | 0.00 % |
B. Revenue and expenditure volatility with 10 % debt service | |||||
Expected revenue | 0.00 % | 1.00 | 0.10 | 0.90 | 0.00 % |
−10.00 % | 0.90 | 0.10 | 0.80 | −11.11 % | |
−5.00 % | 0.95 | 0.10 | 0.85 | −5.56 % | |
5.00 % | 1.05 | 0.10 | 0.95 | 5.56 % | |
10.00 % | 1.10 | 0.10 | 1.00 | 11.11 % | |
Standard deviation | 7.91 % | 0.08 | 0 | 0.08 | 8.78 % |
Average | 0.00 % | 1.00 | 0.10 | 0.90 | 0.00 % |
C. Revenue and expenditure volatility with 25 % debt service | |||||
Expected revenue | 0.00 % | 1.00 | 0.25 | 0.75 | 0.00 % |
−10.00 % | 0.90 | 0.25 | 0.65 | −13.33 % | |
−5.00 % | 0.95 | 0.25 | 0.70 | −6.67 % | |
5.00 % | 1.05 | 0.25 | 0.80 | 6.67 % | |
10.00 % | 1.10 | 0.25 | 0.85 | 13.33 % | |
Standard deviation | 7.91 % | 0.08 | 0 | 0.08 | 10.54 % |
Average | 0.00 % | 1.00 | 0.25 | 0.75 | 0.00 % |
D. Revenue and expenditure volatility with 50 % debt service | |||||
Expected revenue | 0.00 % | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.00 % |
−10.00 % | 0.90 | 0.50 | 0.40 | −20.00 % | |
−5.00 % | 0.95 | 0.50 | 0.45 | −10.00 % | |
5.00 % | 1.05 | 0.50 | 0.55 | 10.00 % | |
10.00 % | 1.10 | 0.50 | 0.60 | 20.00 % | |
Standard deviation | 7.91 % | 0.08 | 0 | 0.08 | 15.81 % |
Average | 0.00 % | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.00 % |
Standard deviation and average calculations assume an equal likelihood of each revenue scenario. Debt service is assumed constant for the year given the contractual nature of debt. Net expenditures are defined as revenue less debt service under a strict balance budget requirement. Percent change in net expenditures is the change from the expected net expenditures and the net expenditures for a revenue scenario. Variants for the assumptions are discussed in the text.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Denison, D.V., Guo, Z. (2015). Local Government Debt Management and Budget Stabilization. In: Hou, Y. (eds) Local Government Budget Stabilization. Studies in Public Budgeting, vol 2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15186-1_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15186-1_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15185-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15186-1
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)