Advertisement

Status of PANS for Bluff Body Aerodynamics of Engineering Relevance

  • Siniša KrajnovićEmail author
  • Guglielmo Minelli
Conference paper
Part of the Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design book series (NNFM, volume 130)

Abstract

This paper is a review of the use of Partially-Averaged Navier-Stokes (PANS) simulations for various bluff body flows of engineering relevance. The application range from flows around generic bluff bodies such as a finite cylinder to flows around simplified road vehicles, trains and landing gears. Active flow control of bluff body flow is one of important application of PANS discussed in this paper. Judgment of the PANS performance is made in comparison with LES and other numerical techniques such as DES and RANS. The review illustrates the success of PANS and its advantage over LES in several bluff body flows, such as the flow around a rudimentary landing gear and the flow around finite cylinder. It also shows that there is a need of improvement in existing PANS methodology with variable \(f_k\) in flows with varying boundary conditions.

Keywords

Large Eddy Simulation Computational Grid Separation Bubble Bluff Body Detach Eddy Simulation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Basara, B., Krajnović, S., Girimaji, S., Pavlović, Z.: Near-wall formulation of the partially averaged Navier stokes turbulence model. AIAA J. 49(12) (2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Basara, B., Krajnović, S., Girimaji, S.: PANS vs. LES for computing of the flow around a 3D bluff body. In: 7th International ERCOFTAC Symposium on Engineering Turbulence Modelling and Measurements, Limassol, Cyprus, 4–6 June 2008Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Frölich, J., von Terzi, D.: Hybrid LES/RANS methods for the simulation of turbulent flows. Progr. Aerosp. Sci. 44, 349–377 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Girimaji, S., Srinivasan, R., Jeong, E.: PANS turbulence models for seamless transition between RANS and LES: fixed point analyses and preliminary results. In: ASME Paper FEDSM2003-4336 (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Girimaji, S.: Partially-averaged Navier-Stokes model for turbulence: a Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes to direct numerical simulation bridging method. J. Appl. Mech. 73(3), 413–421 (2006)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Guilmineau, E., Chikhaoui, O., Deng, G., Visonneau, M.: Cross wind effects on a simplified car model by a DES approach. Comput. Fluids 78, 29–40 (2013)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Han, X., Krajnović, S., Bruneau, C.-H., Mortazavi, I.: Comparison of URANS, PANS, LES and DNS of flows around simplified ground vehicles with passive flow manipulation. In: DLES9 ERCOFTAC WORKSHOP Direct and Large-Eddy Simulation 9, Dresden, Germany, 3–5 April 2013Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Han, X., Krajnović, S.: Study of active flow control for a simplified vehicle model using the PANS method. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 42, 139–150 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Krajnović, S., Fernandes, J.: Numerical simulation of the flow around a simplified vehicle model with active flow control. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 32(1), 192–200 (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Krajnović, S., Han, X.: LES and PANS of passive and active control of flows around generic vehicle bodies. In: Seventh International Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics (ICCFD7), Big Island, Hawaii (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Krajnović, S., Lárusson, R., Basara, B.: Superiority of PANS compared to LES in predicting a rudimentary landing gear flow with affordable meshes. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow (2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2012.04.013
  12. 12.
    Krajnović, S., Ringqvist, P., Basara, B.: Comparison of partially averaged Navier stokes and large-eddy simulations of the flow around a cuboid influenced by crosswind. ASME: J. Fluids Eng. 134 (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Krajnović, S., Sarmast, S.: Numerical investigation of the influence of side winds on a simplified car at various yaw angles. In: 3rd Joint US-European Fluids Engineering Summer Meeting, Symposium on Issues and Perspectives in Ground Vehicle Flows, FEDSM-ICNMM2010-30766, Montreal, Canada, 1–5 Aug 2010Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Krajnović, S., Basara, B.: Numerical simulation of the flow around a tall finite cylinder using LES and PANS. In: Progress in Turbulence III. Springer Proceedings in Physics, vol. 131, pp. 115–118 (2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Krajnović, S., Lárusson, R.: Large eddy simulations of the flow around pyramids. In: CFD Society of Canada Conference, Canmore, Canada (2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Serre, E., Minguez, M., Pasquetti, R., Guilmineau, E., Deng, G.B., Komhaas, M., Schäfer, M., Frölich, J., Hinterberger, C., Rodi, W.: On simulating the turbulent flow around the Ahmed body: a French German collaborative evaluation of LES and DES. Comput. Fluids 78, 10–23 (2013)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Spalart, P.R., Jou, W.H., Strelets, M., Allmaras, S.R.: Detached-eddy simulation of an airfoil at high angle of attack. In: Advances in DNS/LES, Proceedings of the First AFOSR International Conference on DNS/LES (1997)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Applied MechanicsChalmers University of TechnologyGothenburgSweden

Personalised recommendations