Advertisement

How America Was Colonized: Linguistic Evidence

  • Johanna NicholsEmail author

Abstract

America was colonized by Asian migrants who moved from northeastern Siberia into North America, either coastally or by an interior route through now-submerged Beringia, and from there spread southward eventually to settle in the entire hemisphere. Linguistic evidence can shed light on when colonization began; whether it was initially coastal, interior, or both; how many distinct populations were involved; and how rapidly the hemisphere was colonized. The time required to generate the historically attested number of languages and language families in the Americas can be estimated; frequencies of structural properties in areally defined linguistic populations can discriminate between populations and point to geographic origins; and attested and straightforwardly reconstructable rates of language spread can be used to estimate rates of migration and demographic spread. On the linguistic evidence, colonization must have begun before the Last Glacial Maximum. There were at least two distinct populations, perhaps corresponding to interior and coastal immigration routes, and in general, coastal immigration seems to have had a stronger and more varied impact on the linguistic population of the Americas than interior immigration did. The immigrants spread at not much over 1 km/year on average (depending on ecology), taking about 7,000 years to reach southern South America. The linguistic dates are robust and based on plentiful and carefully analyzed material, so they cannot be dismissed, although they conflict with the younger ages estimated in genetic, archaeological, and paleoclimatological work.

Keywords

Settlement of Americas Coastal colonization Language spread Migration rate Language spread rate Pacific Rim 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I thank the Embassy of Kazakhstan, the Permanent Delegation of Kazakhstan to UNESCO, and the Harriman Institute (Columbia University) for making possible the second Great Migrations conference, which among other boons suggested some of the new lines of thought in this work. The research reported here was supported in part by the NSF and the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig; support for the Autotyp database has additionally been provided by the Committee on Research of the University of California, Berkeley, the University of Leipzig, and the University of Zürich.

References

  1. Anderson, D. G., & Gillam, J. C. (2001). Paleoindian interaction and mating networks: Reply to Moore and Moseley. American Antiquity, 66(3), 530–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, D. G., Miller, D. S., Yerka, S. J., & Faught, M. K. (2005). Paleoindian database of the Americas: Update 2005. Current Research in the Pleistocene, 22, 91–92.Google Scholar
  3. Anthony, D. W. (2007). The horse, the wheel, and Language: How Bronze Age riders from the Eurasian steppes shaped the modern world. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bicho, N. F., Haws, J. A., & Davis, L. G. (Eds.). (2011). Trekking the shore: Changing coastlines and the antiquity of coastal settlement. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  5. Bickel, B. (2013). Distributional biases in language families. In B. Bickel, L. Grenoble, D. A. Peterson, & A. Timberlake (Eds.), Language typology and historical contingency (pp. 415–444). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bickel, B., & Nichols, J. (2002). The autotyp research program. Retrieved June 1, 2014, from www.spw.uzh.ch/autotyp/
  7. Bickel, B., & Nichols, J. (2006). Oceania, the Pacific Rim, and the theory of linguistic areas. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 32S, 3–15.Google Scholar
  8. Blust, R. A. (2009). The austronesian languages. Canberra, Australia: Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University.Google Scholar
  9. Bowern, C., & Koch, H. (2004). Australian languages: Classification and the comparative method. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bulbeck, D. (2007). Where river meets sea: A parsimonious model for Homo sapiens colonization of the Indian Ocean and Sahul. Current Anthropology, 48, 315–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Caballero, G., Houser, M. J., Marcus, N., McFarland, T., Pycha, A., Toosarvandani, M., et al. (2008). Nonsyntactic ordering effects in noun incorporation. Linguistic Typology, 12(3), 383–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chang, W., David, H., Chundra, C., & Andrew, G. (2015). Ancestry-constrained phylogenetic analysis supports the steppe chronology of Indo-European origins. Language, 194–244.Google Scholar
  13. Darden, B. J. (2001). On the question of the Anatolian origin of Indo-Hittite. In R. Drews (Ed.), Greater Anatolia and the Indo-Hittite language family (pp. 184–228). Washington, DC: Institute for the Study of Man.Google Scholar
  14. Denny, J. P. (1991). The Algonquian migration from Plateau to Midwest: Linguistics and archaeology. In W. Cowan (Ed.), Papers of the 22nd Algonquianist Conference (pp. 103–134). Ottawa, Canada: Carleton College.Google Scholar
  15. Dillehay, T. D. (1997). Monte Verde: A Late Pleistocene Settlement in Chile. Washington, DC: Smithsonian.Google Scholar
  16. Dillehay, T. D., Ramírez, C., Pino, M., Collins, M. B., Rossen, J., & Pino-Navarro, J. D. (2008). Monte Verde: Seaweed, food, medicine, and the peopling of South America. Science, 320, 784–786.Google Scholar
  17. Donohue, M., & Denham, T. (2012). Lapita and Proto-Oceanic: Thinking outside the pot? Journal of Pacific History, 47(4), 443–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Erlandson, J. M., & Braje, T. M. (2011). From Asia to the Americas by boat? Paleogeography, paleoecology, and stemmed points of the northwest Pacific. Quaternary International, 239, 28–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Erlandson, J. M., Braje, T. M., & Graham, M. H. (2008a). How old is MV II? Seaweeds, shorelines, and pre-Clovis technology at Monte Verde, Chile. Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology, 3(2), 277–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Erlandson, J. M., Graham, M. H., Bourque, B., Corbett, D., Estes, J. A., & Steneck, R. S. (2007). The Kelp highway hypothesis: Marine ecology, the coastal migration theory, and the peopling of the Americas. Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology, 2(2), 161–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Erlandson, J. M., Moss, M. M., & Des Lauriers, M. (2008b). Life on the edge: Early maritime cultures of the Pacific Coast of North America. Quaternary Science Reviews, 27, 2232–2245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Erlandson, J. M., Rick, T. C., Braje, T. J., Casperson, M., Culleton, B., Fulfrost, B., et al. (2011). Paleoindian seafaring, maritime technologies, and coastal foraging on California’s Channel Islands. Science, 331, 1181–1184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fort, J. (2007). Mathematical models of the Neolithic transition: A review for non-mathematicians. British Archaeological Reports, S-1964, 211–216.Google Scholar
  24. Fort, J., Toni, P., & Luigi, L.C.-S. (2004). Palaeolithic populations and waves of advance. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 14(1), 53–61.Google Scholar
  25. Fortescue, M. (2005). Comparative Chukotko-Kamchatkan dictionary. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fortescue, M., Jacobson, S. A., & Kaplan, L. D. (1994). Comparative Eskimo dictionary with Aleut Cognates. Fairbanks, AK: Alaska Native Language Center, University of Alaska Fairbanks.Google Scholar
  27. Gibbons, A. (2014). New sites bring the earliest Americans out of the shadows. Science, 344, 567–568.Google Scholar
  28. Gil, D. (2011). Numeral classifiers. In M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (Eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig, Germany: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Retrieved May 14, 2014, from http://wals.info/chapter/55
  29. Gilbert, M. T. P., Jenkins, D. L., Götherstrom, A., Naveran, N., Sanchez, J. J., Hofreiter, M., et al. (2008). DNA from Pre-Clovis human coprolites in Oregon, North America. Science, 320, 786–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Golla, V. (2011). California Indian languages. Berkeley, LA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  31. Halligan, J. (2014). Geoarchaeological interpretations of reported pre-Clovis components in the Aucilla River, Florida. Presented at Society for American Archaeology annual meeting, Austin.Google Scholar
  32. Hamilton, M. J., & Buchanan, B. (2010). Archaeological support for the three-stage expansion of modern humans across northeastern Eurasia and into the Americas. PLoS One, 5(8), e12472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hill, J. H. (2004, February). Language spread among hunter-gatherers: The North American evidence. Presented at Conference in Honor of Murray B. Emeneau, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
  34. Hoffecker, J. F., Elias, S. A., & O’Rourke, D. H. (2014). Out of Beringia? Science, 343, 979–980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Janhunen, J. (1996). Manchuria: An ethnic history. Helsinki, Finland: Suomalais-ugrilainen Seura.Google Scholar
  36. Kirch, P. V. (1997). The Lapita peoples: Ancestors of the oceanic world. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  37. Kirch, P. V. (2000). On the road of the winds: An archaeological history of the Pacific Islands before European contact. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  38. Kirch, P. V. (2010). The peopling of the Pacific: A holistic anthropological perspective. Annual Review of Anthropology, 39, 131–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Madsen, D. B. (Ed.). (2004). Entering America: Northeast Asia and Beringia before the last glacial maximum. Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah Press.Google Scholar
  40. McConvell, P. (1996). Backtracking to Babel: The chronology of Pama-Nyungan expansion in Australia. Archaeology of Oceania, 31, 125–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Moore, J. H. (1987). The Cheyenne nation: A social and demographic history. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  42. Moore, J. H. (2001). Ethnogenetic patterns in native North America. In J. Terrell (Ed.), Archaeology, language, and history: Essays on culture and ethnicity. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.Google Scholar
  43. Nichols, J. (2000). Estimating dates of early American colonization events. In C. Renfrew, A. McMahon, & L. Trask (Eds.), Time depth in historical linguistics (Vol. 2, pp. 643–663). Cambridge, UK: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.Google Scholar
  44. Nichols, J. (2008). Language spread rates as indicators of glacial-age peopling of the Americas. Current Anthropology, 49(6), 1109–1117. Plus supporting online material.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nichols, J. (2010). Language families, macroareas, and contact. In R. Hickey (Ed.), The handbook of language contact (pp. 361–379). London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  46. Nichols, J., & Bickel, B. (2011). Possessive classification. In M. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (Eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig, Germany: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Retrieved May 11, 2014, from http://wals.info/chapter/59
  47. Nichols, J., & Peterson, D. A. (1996). The Amerind personal pronouns. Language, 72, 336–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Nichols, J., & Peterson, D.A. (2011). Personal pronouns: M-T and N-M patterns. In M. Dryer and M. Haspelmath, (Eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig, Germany: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Retrieved May 11, 2014 from http://wals.info/chapter/137.
  49. Nichols, J., Witzlack-Makarevich, A., Bickel, B. (2013). The Autotyp genealogy and geography. Retrieved May 29, 2014, from www.spw.uzh.ch/autotyp/
  50. Norman, J. L. (1988). Chinese. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Perego, U. A., Achilli, A., Angerhofer, N., Accetturo, M., Pala, M., Olivieri, A., et al. (2009). Distinctive Paleo-Indian migration routes from Beringia marked by two rare mtDNA haplogroups. Current Biology, 19(1), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ramsey, S. R. (1987). The languages of China. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Ross, M. D., Pawley, A. K., & Osmond, M. (Eds.). (2008). The Lexicon of Proto Oceanic, 3: Plants. (Pacific Linguistics.). Canberra, Australia: Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University.Google Scholar
  54. Schurr, T. G. (2004). The peopling of the New World: Perspectives from molecular anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 33, 551–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tamm, E., Kivisild, T., Reidla, M., Metspalu, M., Smith, D. G., Mulligan, C. J., et al. (2007). Beringian standstill and spread of Native American founders. PLoS One, 2(9), e829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Waters, M. R., & Stafford, T. W., Jr. (2007). Redefining the age of Clovis: Implications for the peopling of the Americas. Science, 315, 1122–1126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Waters, M. R., Stafford, T. W., Jr., McDonald, H. G., Gustafson, C., Rasmussen, M., Cappellini, E., et al. (2011). Pre-Clovis mastodon hunting 13,800 years ago at the Manis site, Washington. Science, 334, 351–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Willerslev, E., Davison, J., Moora, M., Zobel, M., Coissac, E., Edwards, M. E., et al. (2014). Fifty thousand years of Arctic vegetation and megafaunal diet. Nature, 506, 47–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures: Historical linguisticsUniversity of California, BerkeleyBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations