Primary Research: Company Survey

  • Dennis Schlegel
Part of the Contributions to Management Science book series (MANAGEMENT SC.)


In this chapter, the research design and findings of the company survey are presented. The main objectives of this chapter are to gain quantitative results of cost-of-capital practices for the focus population and to quantitatively test the influencing factors that were identified in the previous chapter.


Expert Interview Capital Asset Price Model Company Size Capital Budget Return Target 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Al Mutairi M, Tian G, Hasan H, Tan A (2012) Corporate governance and corporate finance practices in a Kuwait stock exchange market listed firm: a survey to confront theory with practice. Corp Gov 12(5):595–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnold G, Hatzopoulos PD (2000) The theory-practice gap in capital budgeting: evidence from the United Kingdom. J Bus Finance Account 27(5/6):603–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atrill P, McLaney EJ (2009) Management accounting for decision makers. Financial Times Prentice Hall, HarlowGoogle Scholar
  4. Baker HK, Dutta S, Saadi S (2011) Corporate finance practices in Canada: where do we stand? Multinatl Finance J 15(3/4):157–192Google Scholar
  5. Bancel F, Mittoo UR (2011) Survey evidence on financing decisions and cost of capital. In: Baker HK, Martin GS (eds) Capital structure & corporate financing decisions. Theory, evidence, and practice. Essential perspectives. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, pp 229–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bennouna K, Meredith GG, Marchant T (2010) Improved capital budgeting decision making: evidence from Canada. Manag Decis 48(2):225–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berry WD, Feldman S (1985) Multiple regression in practice. Sage, Beverly Hills, CAGoogle Scholar
  8. Bethlehem JG, Biffignandi S (2012) Handbook of web surveys. Wiley, Hoboken, NJGoogle Scholar
  9. Black C, Parry J, Anderson H, Bennett JA (2002) Are New Zealand chief financial officers the ‘country cousins’ of their American counterparts? Univ Auck Bus Rev 4(1):1–11Google Scholar
  10. Block S (2003) Divisional cost of capital: a study of its use by major U.S. firms. Eng Econ 48(4):345–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Block S (2005) Are there differences in capital budgeting procedures between industries? An empirical study. Eng Econ 50(1):55–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Britzelmaier B (2013) Controlling. Grundlagen—Praxis—Umsetzung. Pearson, MunichGoogle Scholar
  13. Brooks C (2008) Introductory econometrics for finance. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brounen D, de Jong A, Koedijk K (2004) Corporate finance in Europe: confronting theory with practice. Financ Manag 33(4):71–101Google Scholar
  15. Brunzell T, Liljeblom E, Vaihekoski M (2011) Determinants of capital budgeting methods and hurdle rates in Nordic firms. Account Finance 53(1):85–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chazi A, Terra PRS, Zanella FC (2010) Theory versus practice: perspectives of Middle Eastern financial managers. Eur Bus Rev 22(2):195–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cohen G, Yagil J (2007) A multinational survey of corporate financial policies. J Appl Finance 17(1):57–69Google Scholar
  18. Correia C, Cramer P (2008) An analysis of cost of capital, capital structure and capital budgeting practices: a survey of South African listed companies. Meditari Account Res 16(2):31–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Craighead WE, Weiner IB (2010) The Corsini encyclopedia of psychology. Wiley, Hoboken, NJGoogle Scholar
  20. David M, Sutton CD (2011) Social research. An introduction. Sage, Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
  21. de Vaus DA (2002) Surveys in social research. Routledge, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Easterby-Smith M, Thorpe R, Jackson PR (2012) Management research, 4th edn. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Empel MV (2008) Financial services in Europe. An introductory overview. European law collection, 3rd edn. Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn, the NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  24. Fasnacht D (2009) Open innovation in the financial services. Growing through openness, flexibility and customer integration. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  25. Field AP (2013) Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. And sex and drugs and rock ‘n’ roll. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. Fowler FJ (2009) Survey research methods. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
  27. Frank A (2007) On the value of survey-based research in finance. Alternation 14(1):243–261Google Scholar
  28. Frankfort-Nachmias C, Leon-Guerrero A (2011) Social statistics for a diverse society. Pine Forge Press, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
  29. Fuller WA (2009) Sampling statistics. Wiley, Hoboken, NJCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Geginat J, Morath B, Wittmann R, Knüsel P (2006) Kapitalkosten als strategisches Entscheidungskriterium. Available at
  31. Graham JR, Harvey CR (2001) The theory and practice of corporate finance: evidence from the field. J Financ Econ 60(2/3):187–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Graham JR, Harvey CR (2003) The theory and practice of corporate finance: the data. Available from
  33. Groves RM, Fowler FJ, Couper MP, Lepkowski JM, Singer E, Tourangeau R (2009) Survey methodology. Wiley, Hoboken, NJGoogle Scholar
  34. Hain J (2013) Einfache statistische Testverfahren. Available at
  35. Hermes N, Smid P, Yao L (2007) Capital budgeting practices: a comparative study of the Netherlands and China. Int Bus Rev 16(5):630–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Iacobucci D, Churchill GA (2010) Marketing research. Methodological foundations. South-Western Cengage Learning, Mason, OHGoogle Scholar
  37. Kline RB (2009) Becoming a behavioral science researcher. A guide to producing research that matters. Guilford Press, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  38. Lavrakas PJ (2008) Encyclopedia of survey research methods. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lewis-Beck MS, Bryman A, Liao TF (2004) The Sage encyclopedia of social science research methods. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. McLaney E, Pointon J, Thomas M, Tucker J (2004) Practitioners’ perspectives on the UK cost of capital. Eur J Finance 10(2):123–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Miller RL, Jentz GA (2010) Fundamentals of business law. Excerpted cases. South-Western Cengage Learning, Mason, OHGoogle Scholar
  42. Miller LA, McIntire SA, Lovler RL (2011) Foundations of psychological testing. A practical approach. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
  43. Moore DS, McCabe GP (2006) Introduction to the practice of statistics. WH Freeman, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  44. Newcomer KE, Wirtz PW (2004) Using statistics in evaluation. In: Wholey JS, Hatry HP, Newcomer KE (eds) Handbook of practical program evaluation. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, pp 439–478Google Scholar
  45. Norris G (2012) Introduction to statistics with SPSS for social science. Pearson, HarlowGoogle Scholar
  46. Petersen C, Plenborg T, Schøler F (2006) Issues in valuation of privately held firms. J Private Equity 10(1):33–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Reinard JC (2006) Communication research statistics. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
  48. Ryan PA, Ryan GP (2002) Capital budgeting practices of the fortune 1000: how have things changed? J Bus Manag 8(4):355–364Google Scholar
  49. Serita T (2008) On survey data analysis in corporate finance. J Int Econ Stud 22:97–111Google Scholar
  50. Shannon ML (2004) Spurious relationship. In: Lewis-Beck MS, Bryman A, Liao TF (eds) The Sage encyclopedia of social science research methods. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 1062–1063Google Scholar
  51. Siegel AF (2012) Practical business statistics. Academic, Burlington, MAGoogle Scholar
  52. Smith T, Walsh K (2013) Why the CAPM is half-right and everything else is wrong. Abacus 49:73–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sterba SK, Foster ME (2008) Self-selected sample. In: Lavrakas PJ (ed) Encyclopedia of survey research methods. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
  54. Stopher PR (2012) Collecting, managing, and assessing data using sample surveys. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  55. Subrahmanyam A (2013) Comments and perspectives on ‘the capital asset pricing model’. Abacus 49:79–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Thode HC (2002) Testing for normality. Statistics, textbooks and monographs, 164th edn. Marcel Dekker, New York, NYCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Truong G, Partington G, Peat M (2008) Cost-of-capital estimation and capital-budgeting practice in Australia. Aust J Manag 33(1):95–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Utts JM, Heckard RF (2012) Mind on statistics. Brooks/Cole Cengage Learning, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  59. Wholey JS, Hatry HP, Newcomer KE (2004) Handbook of practical program evaluation. Wiley, Hoboken, NJGoogle Scholar
  60. Zachrau M (2013) LinkedIn holt auf, XING immer noch Spitze in DACH. Available from

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dennis Schlegel
    • 1
  1. 1.StuttgartGermany

Personalised recommendations