Empirical Research Approach and Methods

  • Dennis Schlegel
Part of the Contributions to Management Science book series (MANAGEMENT SC.)


In the previous chapter, the philosophical assumptions of this thesis were explained. It was explained that based on a post-positivist paradigm, a mixed methods approach is pursued. As mixed methods approaches are not uncontroversial among academics, a brief review of relevant literature and the mixed methods debate is presented. Subsequently, an overview of the methods of this thesis is given.


Mixed Method Expert Interview Mixed Method Approach Mixed Method Research Validity Concern 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Bazeley P (2004) Issues in mixing qualitative and quantitative approaches to research. In: Buber R, Gadner J, Richards L (eds) Applying qualitative methods to marketing management research. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp 141–156Google Scholar
  2. Bryman A (2006) Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done? Qual Res 6(1):97–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bryman A (2007) Barriers to integrating quantitative and qualitative research. J Mixed Methods Res 1(1):8–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bryman A (2008) Social research methods. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  5. Cohen L, Manion L, Morrison K (2007) Research methods in education. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL (2007) Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
  7. David M, Sutton CD (2011) Social research. An introduction. Sage, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  8. Easterby-Smith M, Thorpe R, Jackson PR (2008) Management research, 3rd edn. Sage, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  9. Harden A, Thomas J (2010) Mixed methods and systematic reviews. Examples and emerging issues. In: Tashakkori A, Teddlie C (eds) Sage handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Sage, Los Angeles, pp 749–774Google Scholar
  10. Ivankova NV, Creswell JW, Stick SL (2006) Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: from theory to practice. Field Methods 18(3):3–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Johnson B (2012) Educational research, 4th edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
  12. Johnson RB, Onwuegbuzie AJ (2004) Mixed methods research: a research paradigm whose time has come. Educ Res 33(7):14–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Johnson RB, Onwuegbuzie AJ, Turner LA (2007) Toward a definition of mixed methods research. J Mixed Methods Res 1(2):112–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Krishnaswamy KN, Sivakumar AI, Mathirajan M (2006) Management research methodology. Integration of principles, methods and techniques. Pearson, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  15. Marshall C, Rossman GB (2011) Designing qualitative research. Sage, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  16. Myers MD (2009) Qualitative research in business and management. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. Niglas K (2000) Combining quantitative and qualitative approaches. Paper presented at the European conference on educational research, Edinburgh. Accessed 20–23 Sept 2000
  18. Saunders M, Lewis P, Thornhill A (2009) Research methods for business students. Financial Times Prentice Hall, HarlowGoogle Scholar
  19. Tashakkori A, Teddlie C (2002) Handbook of mixed methods. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. Tashakkori A, Teddlie C (2010) Sage handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Sage, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  21. Teddlie C, Tashakkori A (2006) A general typology of research designs featuring mixed methods. Res Sch 13(1):12–28Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dennis Schlegel
    • 1
  1. 1.StuttgartGermany

Personalised recommendations