Skip to main content

Simulation-Based Optimization Using Greedy Techniques and Simulated Annealing for Optimal Equipment Selection Within Print Production Environments

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Applied Simulation and Optimization

Abstract

Xerox has invented, tested, and implemented a novel class of operations-research-based productivity improvement offerings, marketed as Lean Document Production (LDP), for the $100 billion printing industry in the United States. The software toolkit that enables the optimization of print shops is data-driven and simulation-based. It enables quick modeling of complex print production environments under the cellular production framework. The software toolkit automates several steps of the modeling process by taking declarative inputs from the end user and then automatically generating complex simulation models that are used to determine improved design and operating policies. This chapter describes the addition of another layer of automation consisting of simulation-based optimization using simulated annealing and greedy search techniques that enable the search of a large number of design alternatives in the presence of operational and cost constraints. The greedy search procedure quickly determines an acceptable solution in a web-based online application environment. The simulated annealing technique is more time consuming and is performed offline. The results of the application of this approach to real-world problems are described.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ahmed MA, Alkhamis TM, Hasan M (1997) Optimizing discrete stochastic systems using simulated annealing and simulation. Computers & Industrial Engineering 32:823–836

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alkhamis TM, Ahmed MA (2004) Simulation based optimization using simulated annealing with confidence interval. In: Ingalls RG, Rossetti MD, Smith JS, Peters BA (eds) Proceedings of the 2004 winter simulation conference, Washington DC, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  3. Andradóttir S, Goldsman D, Kim SH (2005) Finding the best in the presence of a stochastic constraint. In: Kuhl ME, Steiger NM, Armstrong FB, Joines JA (eds) Proceedings of the 2005 winter simulation conference, Florida, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  4. Batur D, Kim SH (2005) Procedures for feasibility detection in the presence of multiple constraints. In: Kuhl ME, Steiger NM, Armstrong FB, Joines JA (eds) Proceedings of the 2005 winter simulation conference, Florida, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fu MC, Andradóttir S, Carson JS, Glover F, Harrell CR, Ho YC, Kelly JP, Robinson SM (2000) Integrating optimization and simulation: research and practice. In: Joines JA, Barton RR, Kang K, Fishwick PA (eds) Proceedings of the 2000 winter simulation conference, Florida, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gopakumar B, Sundaram S, Wang S, Koli S, Srihari K (2008) A simulation based approach for dock allocation in a food distribution center. In: Mason SJ, Hill RR, Moench L, Rose O, Jefferson T, Flower JW (eds) Proceedings of the 2008 winter simulation conference, Florida, 2008

    Google Scholar 

  7. Haddock J, Mittenthal J (1992) Simulation optimization using simulated annealing. Computers & Industrial Engineering 22:387–395

    Google Scholar 

  8. Harkan IA, Hariga M (2007) A simulation optimization solution to the inventory continuous review problem with lot size dependent lead time. The Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering 2:327–338

    Google Scholar 

  9. James G, Witten D, Hastie T, Tibshirani R (2013) An introduction to statistical learning with applications in R. Springer Heidelberg, New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. Johnson A, Carlo HJ, Jimenez JA, Nazzal D, Lasrado V (2009) A greedy heuristic for locating crossovers in conveyor based ahms in wafer fabs. In: Rossetti MD, Hill RR, Hohansson B, Dunkin A, Ingalls RG (eds) Proceedings of the 2009 winter simulation conference, Texas, 2009

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kabirian A, Olafsson S (2009) Selection of the best with stochastic constraints. In: Rossetti MD, Hill RR, Hohansson B, Dunkin A, Ingalls RG (eds) Proceedings of the 2009 winter simulation conference, Texas, 2009

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kirkpatrick S, Gelatt CD, Vecchi MP (1983) Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220: 671–680

    Google Scholar 

  13. Luo Y, Lim E (2011) Simulation based optimization over discrete sets with noisy constraints. In: Jain S, Creasey RR, Himmerspach J, White KP, Fu M (eds) Proceedings of the 2011 winter simulation conference, Arizona, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  14. Prudius AA, Andradóttir S (2005) Two simulated annealing algorithms for noisy objective functions. In: Kuhl ME, Steiger NM, Armstrong FB, Joines JA (eds) Proceedings of the 2005 winter simulation conference, Florida, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pujowidianto NA, Lee LH, Chen CH, Yap CM (2009) Optimal computing budget allocation for constraint optimization. In: Rossetti MD, Hill RR, Hohansson B, Dunkin A, Ingalls RG (eds) Proceedings of the 2009 winter simulation conference, Texas, 2009

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rai S (2008) Fat tail inputs in manufacturing systems. In: Flower J, Mason S (eds) Proceedings 2008 industrial engineering research conference, Norcross, GA

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rai S, Duke CB, Lowe V, Trotter CQ, Scheermesser T (2009) LDP lean document production -O. R. - enhanced productivity improvements for the printing industry. Interfaces 39: 69–90

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sandeman T, Stanford C, Fricke C, Bodon P (2010) Integrating optimization and simulation a comparison of two case studies in mine planning”. In: Johansson B, Jain S, Montoya - Torres J, Hugan J, Yücesan E (eds) Proceedings of the 2010 winter simulation conference, Maryland, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  19. Szechtman R, Yücesan E (2008) A new perspective on feasibility determination. In: Mason SJ, Hill RR, Moench L, Rose O, Jefferson T, Flower JW (eds) Proceedings of the 2008 winter simulation conference, Florida, 2008

    Google Scholar 

  20. Yue Y, Marla L, Krishnan R (2012) An efficient simulation based approach to ambulance fleet allocation and dynamic redeployment. In: proceedings of the 26\(^{\rm th}\) AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2014

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zeng Q, Yang Z (2009) Integrating simulation and optimization to schedule loading operations in container terminals. Computers and Operations Research 36: 1935–1944

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sudhendu Rai .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rai, S., Gross, E., Ettam, R.K. (2015). Simulation-Based Optimization Using Greedy Techniques and Simulated Annealing for Optimal Equipment Selection Within Print Production Environments. In: Mujica Mota, M., De La Mota, I., Guimarans Serrano, D. (eds) Applied Simulation and Optimization. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15033-8_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics