Skip to main content

Mental Models and Creativity in Engineering and Architectural Design Teams

  • Conference paper
Design Computing and Cognition '14

Abstract

Mental models play a decisive role when it comes to cooperate and coordinate team activities in complex environments and contexts. However, scientific knowledge about the coordination of mental models in heterogeneous groups, and even more across different disciplines, has not yield much progress in the last decades. Mental models affect design activities on content and process levels. These have consequences for the different phases in the design process, from the first moment of defining the problem till the final decision for detail design. The present paper focuses on the comparison of two different design disciplines, and analyzes how problems demanding creativity are approached. Two meetings of engineering and architectural teams solving a complex domain-specific design problem in the very early stage of idea generation were studied. Utterances of the transcripts from both team sessions have been explored based on the categorisation system developed explicitly for the analysis of group behaviour in complex environments. Qualitative and quantitative analyses are presented, from which conclusions about the differences in design problem solving processes of design teams with different disciplinary backgrounds are offered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Akin O, Akin C (1998) On the process of creativity in puzzles, inventions, and designs. Autom Constr 7:123–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Badke-Schaub P, Neumann A, Lauche K, Mohammed S (2007) Mental models in design teams: a valid approach to performance in design collaboration? CoDesign 3:5–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Klimoski R, Mohammed S (1994) Team mental model – construct or metaphor? J Manag 20:403–437

    Google Scholar 

  4. Badke-Schaub P, Frankenberger E (1999) Analysis of design projects. Des Study 20:465–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bierhals R, Schuster I, Kohler P, Badke-Schaub P (2007) Shared mental models – linking team cognition and performance. CoDesign 3:75–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Amabile TM (1996) Creativity in context: update to the social psychology of creativity. Westview, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  7. Casakin H, Davidovitch N, Milgram R (2010) Creative thinking as a predictor of creative problem solving in architectural design. Psychol Aesthet Creat Arts 4:31–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kaufman JC, Baer J (eds) (2005) Creativity across domains: faces of the muse. Erlbaum, Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dörner D (1996) The logic of failure: recognizing and avoiding error in complex situations. Metropolitan Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gigerenzer G (2007) Gut feelings: the intelligence of the unconscious. Penguin, New York

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pahl G, Beitz W (1996) Engineering design: a systematic approach. Springer–Verlag, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Sarkar P, Chakrabarti A (2011) Assessing design creativity: measure of novelty and usefulness. Des Study 32:348–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Segers N, de Vries B, Achten HH (2005) Do word graphs stimulate design? Des Stud 26:625–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Torrance EP (1974) Torrance tests of creative thinking. Personnel Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shah JJ, Vargas-Hernandez N (2002) Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness. Des Stud 24:111–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Berliner C, Brimson JA (1988) A cost management for today’s advanced manufacturing: the CAM-I conceptual design[M]. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ulrich KT, Eppinger SD (2003) Product design and development, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lawson B, Loke SM (1997) Computers, words and pictures. Des Stud 18:171–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Goldschmidt G, Tatsa D (2005) How good are good ideas? Correlates of design creativity. Des Stud 26:593–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mednick SA (1962) The associative basis of creative process. Psychol Rev 69:220–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lai IC (2005) Dynamic idea maps: a framework for linking ideas with cases during brainstorming. Int J Archit Comput 3:429–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Casakin H (2005) Design aided by visual displays: a cognitive approach. J Archit Plan Res 22:250–265

    Google Scholar 

  23. Casakin H, Goldschmidt G (1999) Expertise and the use of visual analogy: implications for design education. Des Stud 20:153–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nagai Y, Taura T, Mukai F (2009) Concept blending and dissimilarity factors for creative concept generation process. Des Stud 30:648–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gero JM (2000) Computational models of innovative and creative design processes. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 64:183–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chakrabarti A, Bligh TP (1996) An approach to functional synthesis of design concepts: theory, application, and emerging research issues. AI EDAM 10:313–331

    Google Scholar 

  27. Badke-Schaub P, Buerschaper C (2001) Creativity and complex problem solving in the social context. In: Allwood CM, Selart M (eds) Decision making: social and creative dimensions. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 177–196

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Liu YC, Bligh T, Chakrabarti A (2003) Towards an ‘ideal’ approach for concept generation. Des Stud 24:341–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gentner DA, Stevens AL (1983) Mental models. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale

    Google Scholar 

  30. Norman DA (1983) Some observations on mental models. In: Gentner DA, Stevens AL (eds) Mental models. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 7–14

    Google Scholar 

  31. Smyth MM, Collins AF, Morris PE, Levy P (1994) Cognition in action, 2nd edn. Psychology Press, East Sussex

    Google Scholar 

  32. Badke-Schaub P, Neumann A, Lauche K (2011) An observation-based method for measuring the sharedness of mental models in teams. In: Boos M, Kolbe M, Kappeler PM, Ellwart T (eds) Coordination in Human and Primate Groups. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 177–197

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. Marshall N (2007) Team mental models in action: a practice-based perspective. CoDesign 3:29–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Cannon-Bowers JA, Salas E, Converse S (1993) Shared mental models in expert team decision making. In: Castellan NJ Jr (ed) Individual and group decision making: current issues. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 221–246

    Google Scholar 

  35. Edmondson AC, Nembhard IM (2009) Product development and learning in project teams: the challenges are the benefits. J Prod Innov Manag 26:123–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. McDonnell J, Lloyd P (eds) (2009) About: designing – analysing design meetings. Taylor and Francis, London

    Google Scholar 

  37. Osborn AF (1957) Applied imagination — principles and procedures of creative thinking. Scribner, New York

    Google Scholar 

  38. Newell A, Simon HA (1972) Human problem-solving. Prentice- Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  39. Sawyer RK (2003) Group creativity: music, theatre, collaboration. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  40. Stempfle J, Badke-Schaub P (2002) Thinking in design teams – an analysis of team communication. Des Stud 23:473–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Langan-Fox J, Anglim J, Wilson JR (2004) Mental models, team mental models, and performance: process, development, and future directions. Hum Factors Ergon Manuf 14:331–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Guilford JP (1981) Potentiality for creativity. In: Gowan JC, Khatena J, Torance EP (eds) Creativity: its educational implications. Kendall Hunt, Dubuque, pp 1–5

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hernan Casakin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Casakin, H., Badke-Schaub, P. (2015). Mental Models and Creativity in Engineering and Architectural Design Teams. In: Gero, J., Hanna, S. (eds) Design Computing and Cognition '14. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14956-1_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14956-1_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-14955-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-14956-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics