Abstract
Mental models play a decisive role when it comes to cooperate and coordinate team activities in complex environments and contexts. However, scientific knowledge about the coordination of mental models in heterogeneous groups, and even more across different disciplines, has not yield much progress in the last decades. Mental models affect design activities on content and process levels. These have consequences for the different phases in the design process, from the first moment of defining the problem till the final decision for detail design. The present paper focuses on the comparison of two different design disciplines, and analyzes how problems demanding creativity are approached. Two meetings of engineering and architectural teams solving a complex domain-specific design problem in the very early stage of idea generation were studied. Utterances of the transcripts from both team sessions have been explored based on the categorisation system developed explicitly for the analysis of group behaviour in complex environments. Qualitative and quantitative analyses are presented, from which conclusions about the differences in design problem solving processes of design teams with different disciplinary backgrounds are offered.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Akin O, Akin C (1998) On the process of creativity in puzzles, inventions, and designs. Autom Constr 7:123–138
Badke-Schaub P, Neumann A, Lauche K, Mohammed S (2007) Mental models in design teams: a valid approach to performance in design collaboration? CoDesign 3:5–20
Klimoski R, Mohammed S (1994) Team mental model – construct or metaphor? J Manag 20:403–437
Badke-Schaub P, Frankenberger E (1999) Analysis of design projects. Des Study 20:465–480
Bierhals R, Schuster I, Kohler P, Badke-Schaub P (2007) Shared mental models – linking team cognition and performance. CoDesign 3:75–94
Amabile TM (1996) Creativity in context: update to the social psychology of creativity. Westview, Boulder
Casakin H, Davidovitch N, Milgram R (2010) Creative thinking as a predictor of creative problem solving in architectural design. Psychol Aesthet Creat Arts 4:31–35
Kaufman JC, Baer J (eds) (2005) Creativity across domains: faces of the muse. Erlbaum, Mahwah
Dörner D (1996) The logic of failure: recognizing and avoiding error in complex situations. Metropolitan Books, New York
Gigerenzer G (2007) Gut feelings: the intelligence of the unconscious. Penguin, New York
Pahl G, Beitz W (1996) Engineering design: a systematic approach. Springer–Verlag, London
Sarkar P, Chakrabarti A (2011) Assessing design creativity: measure of novelty and usefulness. Des Study 32:348–383
Segers N, de Vries B, Achten HH (2005) Do word graphs stimulate design? Des Stud 26:625–647
Torrance EP (1974) Torrance tests of creative thinking. Personnel Press, Princeton
Shah JJ, Vargas-Hernandez N (2002) Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness. Des Stud 24:111–134
Berliner C, Brimson JA (1988) A cost management for today’s advanced manufacturing: the CAM-I conceptual design[M]. Harvard Business School Press, Boston
Ulrich KT, Eppinger SD (2003) Product design and development, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, Boston
Lawson B, Loke SM (1997) Computers, words and pictures. Des Stud 18:171–183
Goldschmidt G, Tatsa D (2005) How good are good ideas? Correlates of design creativity. Des Stud 26:593–611
Mednick SA (1962) The associative basis of creative process. Psychol Rev 69:220–232
Lai IC (2005) Dynamic idea maps: a framework for linking ideas with cases during brainstorming. Int J Archit Comput 3:429–447
Casakin H (2005) Design aided by visual displays: a cognitive approach. J Archit Plan Res 22:250–265
Casakin H, Goldschmidt G (1999) Expertise and the use of visual analogy: implications for design education. Des Stud 20:153–175
Nagai Y, Taura T, Mukai F (2009) Concept blending and dissimilarity factors for creative concept generation process. Des Stud 30:648–675
Gero JM (2000) Computational models of innovative and creative design processes. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 64:183–196
Chakrabarti A, Bligh TP (1996) An approach to functional synthesis of design concepts: theory, application, and emerging research issues. AI EDAM 10:313–331
Badke-Schaub P, Buerschaper C (2001) Creativity and complex problem solving in the social context. In: Allwood CM, Selart M (eds) Decision making: social and creative dimensions. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 177–196
Liu YC, Bligh T, Chakrabarti A (2003) Towards an ‘ideal’ approach for concept generation. Des Stud 24:341–355
Gentner DA, Stevens AL (1983) Mental models. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale
Norman DA (1983) Some observations on mental models. In: Gentner DA, Stevens AL (eds) Mental models. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 7–14
Smyth MM, Collins AF, Morris PE, Levy P (1994) Cognition in action, 2nd edn. Psychology Press, East Sussex
Badke-Schaub P, Neumann A, Lauche K (2011) An observation-based method for measuring the sharedness of mental models in teams. In: Boos M, Kolbe M, Kappeler PM, Ellwart T (eds) Coordination in Human and Primate Groups. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 177–197
Marshall N (2007) Team mental models in action: a practice-based perspective. CoDesign 3:29–36
Cannon-Bowers JA, Salas E, Converse S (1993) Shared mental models in expert team decision making. In: Castellan NJ Jr (ed) Individual and group decision making: current issues. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 221–246
Edmondson AC, Nembhard IM (2009) Product development and learning in project teams: the challenges are the benefits. J Prod Innov Manag 26:123–138
McDonnell J, Lloyd P (eds) (2009) About: designing – analysing design meetings. Taylor and Francis, London
Osborn AF (1957) Applied imagination — principles and procedures of creative thinking. Scribner, New York
Newell A, Simon HA (1972) Human problem-solving. Prentice- Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Sawyer RK (2003) Group creativity: music, theatre, collaboration. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah
Stempfle J, Badke-Schaub P (2002) Thinking in design teams – an analysis of team communication. Des Stud 23:473–496
Langan-Fox J, Anglim J, Wilson JR (2004) Mental models, team mental models, and performance: process, development, and future directions. Hum Factors Ergon Manuf 14:331–352
Guilford JP (1981) Potentiality for creativity. In: Gowan JC, Khatena J, Torance EP (eds) Creativity: its educational implications. Kendall Hunt, Dubuque, pp 1–5
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Casakin, H., Badke-Schaub, P. (2015). Mental Models and Creativity in Engineering and Architectural Design Teams. In: Gero, J., Hanna, S. (eds) Design Computing and Cognition '14. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14956-1_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14956-1_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-14955-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-14956-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)