Abstract
Social media gives new opportunities in customer survey and market survey for design inspiration with comments posted online by users spontaneously, in an oral-near language, and almost free of biases. This new source however has huge size and complexity of data needed to be processed. In this paper, we propose an automated way for processing these comments, using sentiment rating algorithm. Traps like negations, irony, smileys are considered in our algorithm. We validate it on the example of a commercial home theatre system, comparing our automated sentiment predictions with the one of a group of 15 test subjects, resulting in a satisfactory correlation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
McGue M, Bouchard TJ (1998) Genetic and environmental influences on human behavorial differences. Annu Rev Neurosci 21:1–24
Lewis K, van Horn D (2013) Design analytics in consumer product design: a simulated study. In: ASME international design engineering technical conferences, Portland
Bollen J, Mao H, Zeng X-J (2011) Twitter mood predicts stock market. J Comput Sci 2(1):1–6
Caragea C, McNeese N, Jaiswal A, Traylor G, Kim HW, Mitra P, Wu D, Tapia AH, Giles L, Jansen BJ (2011) Classifying text messages for the haiti earthquake. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on in- formation systems for crisis response and management (ISCRAM2011)
Culotta A (2010) Towards detecting influenza epidemics by analyzing Twitter messages. In: Proceedings of the first workshop on social media analytics (SOMA ‘10). ACM, New York, pp 115–122
Liu B (2010) Sentiment analysis and subjectivity. In: FJN Indurkhya (ed) Handbook of natural language processing, Chicago
Buttle F (2003) Customer relationship management. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford
Berry MJ, Linoff G (1997) Data mining techniques: for marketing, sales, and customer support. Wiley, New York
Bennekom FCV (2002) Customer surveying: a guidebook for service managers. Customer Service Press, Bolton
Kushal D, Lawrence S, Pennock D (2003) Mining the peanut gallery: opinion extraction and semantic classification of product reviews. In: WWW2003, 20–24 May 2003, Budapest
Tucker C, Kim H (2011) Predicting emerging product design trend by mining publicly available customer review data. In: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on engineering design (ICED11), 6, pp 43–52
Stone PJ, Dunphy DC, Smith MS, Ogilvie DM (1966) The general inquirer: a computer approach to content analysis. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Iker HP (1974) SELECT: a computer program to identify associationally rich words for content analysis. I. Statistical results. Comput Humanit 8:313–319
Herring SR, Poon CM, Balasi GA, Bailey BP (2011) TweetSpiration: leveraging social media for design inspiration. CHI Extended Abstracts, pp 2311–2316. ACM, 2011
Nazarenko A, Habert B, Reynaud C (1995) “Open response” surveys: from tagging to syntactic and semantic analysis. In: Proceedings of JADT (3rd international conference on statistical analysis of textual data), Vol. II, pp 29–36, Rome
OConnor B, Balasubramanyan R, Routledge BR, Smith NA (2010) From tweets to polls: linking text sentiment to public opinion time series. In: Proceedings of the international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media, pp 122–129
Pak A, Paroubek P (2010) Twitter as corpus for sentiment analysis and opinion mining. LREC conference, pp 24–37
Chowdary G (2003) Natural language processing. Annu Rev Inf Sci Technol 37:51–89
Liddy E (1998) Enhanced text retrieval using natural language processing. Bull Am Soc Inf Sci 24:14–16
Naman M, Boase J, Lai C-H (2010) Is it really about me? Message content in social awareness streams. In: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, pp 189–192
Bollen J, Mao H, Pepe A (2011) Modelling public mood and sentiment: twitter sentiment and socio-economic phenomena. AAAI conference on weblogs and Media. Michigan, pp 450–453
Hu M, Liu B (2004) Mining and summarizing customer reviews. SIGKDD. pp 168–177
Manning Klein D, & D, C (2003) Accurate unlexicalized parsing. 41st Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp 423–430
Whissel C (1989) The dictionary of affect in language. Academic, London
Bryne R (Director) (2006) The secret [motion picture]
Miller GA (1995) WordNet: a lexical database for english. Commun ACM 38(11):39–41, ACM New-York
de Marneffe M-C, Manning CD (2008). The Stanford typed dependencies representation, CrossParser ‘08 Coling 2008: Proceedings of the workshop on Cross-Framework and Cross-Domain Parser Evaluation. Association for Computational Linguistics Stroudsburg, pp 1–8
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Raghupathi, D., Yannou, B., Farel, R., Poirson, E. (2015). Learning from Product Users, a Sentiment Rating Algorithm. In: Gero, J., Hanna, S. (eds) Design Computing and Cognition '14. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14956-1_27
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14956-1_27
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-14955-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-14956-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)