Skip to main content

Learning from Product Users, a Sentiment Rating Algorithm

  • Conference paper
Design Computing and Cognition '14

Abstract

Social media gives new opportunities in customer survey and market survey for design inspiration with comments posted online by users spontaneously, in an oral-near language, and almost free of biases. This new source however has huge size and complexity of data needed to be processed. In this paper, we propose an automated way for processing these comments, using sentiment rating algorithm. Traps like negations, irony, smileys are considered in our algorithm. We validate it on the example of a commercial home theatre system, comparing our automated sentiment predictions with the one of a group of 15 test subjects, resulting in a satisfactory correlation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. McGue M, Bouchard TJ (1998) Genetic and environmental influences on human behavorial differences. Annu Rev Neurosci 21:1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lewis K, van Horn D (2013) Design analytics in consumer product design: a simulated study. In: ASME international design engineering technical conferences, Portland

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bollen J, Mao H, Zeng X-J (2011) Twitter mood predicts stock market. J Comput Sci 2(1):1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Caragea C, McNeese N, Jaiswal A, Traylor G, Kim HW, Mitra P, Wu D, Tapia AH, Giles L, Jansen BJ (2011) Classifying text messages for the haiti earthquake. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on in- formation systems for crisis response and management (ISCRAM2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Culotta A (2010) Towards detecting influenza epidemics by analyzing Twitter messages. In: Proceedings of the first workshop on social media analytics (SOMA ‘10). ACM, New York, pp 115–122

    Google Scholar 

  6. Liu B (2010) Sentiment analysis and subjectivity. In: FJN Indurkhya (ed) Handbook of natural language processing, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  7. Buttle F (2003) Customer relationship management. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  8. Berry MJ, Linoff G (1997) Data mining techniques: for marketing, sales, and customer support. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bennekom FCV (2002) Customer surveying: a guidebook for service managers. Customer Service Press, Bolton

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kushal D, Lawrence S, Pennock D (2003) Mining the peanut gallery: opinion extraction and semantic classification of product reviews. In: WWW2003, 20–24 May 2003, Budapest

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tucker C, Kim H (2011) Predicting emerging product design trend by mining publicly available customer review data. In: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on engineering design (ICED11), 6, pp 43–52

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stone PJ, Dunphy DC, Smith MS, Ogilvie DM (1966) The general inquirer: a computer approach to content analysis. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  13. Iker HP (1974) SELECT: a computer program to identify associationally rich words for content analysis. I. Statistical results. Comput Humanit 8:313–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Herring SR, Poon CM, Balasi GA, Bailey BP (2011) TweetSpiration: leveraging social media for design inspiration. CHI Extended Abstracts, pp 2311–2316. ACM, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nazarenko A, Habert B, Reynaud C (1995) “Open response” surveys: from tagging to syntactic and semantic analysis. In: Proceedings of JADT (3rd international conference on statistical analysis of textual data), Vol. II, pp 29–36, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  16. OConnor B, Balasubramanyan R, Routledge BR, Smith NA (2010) From tweets to polls: linking text sentiment to public opinion time series. In: Proceedings of the international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media, pp 122–129

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pak A, Paroubek P (2010) Twitter as corpus for sentiment analysis and opinion mining. LREC conference, pp 24–37

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chowdary G (2003) Natural language processing. Annu Rev Inf Sci Technol 37:51–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Liddy E (1998) Enhanced text retrieval using natural language processing. Bull Am Soc Inf Sci 24:14–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Naman M, Boase J, Lai C-H (2010) Is it really about me? Message content in social awareness streams. In: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, pp 189–192

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bollen J, Mao H, Pepe A (2011) Modelling public mood and sentiment: twitter sentiment and socio-economic phenomena. AAAI conference on weblogs and Media. Michigan, pp 450–453

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hu M, Liu B (2004) Mining and summarizing customer reviews. SIGKDD. pp 168–177

    Google Scholar 

  23. Manning Klein D, & D, C (2003) Accurate unlexicalized parsing. 41st Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp 423–430

    Google Scholar 

  24. Whissel C (1989) The dictionary of affect in language. Academic, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Bryne R (Director) (2006) The secret [motion picture]

    Google Scholar 

  26. Miller GA (1995) WordNet: a lexical database for english. Commun ACM 38(11):39–41, ACM New-York

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. de Marneffe M-C, Manning CD (2008). The Stanford typed dependencies representation, CrossParser ‘08 Coling 2008: Proceedings of the workshop on Cross-Framework and Cross-Domain Parser Evaluation. Association for Computational Linguistics Stroudsburg, pp 1–8

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dilip Raghupathi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Raghupathi, D., Yannou, B., Farel, R., Poirson, E. (2015). Learning from Product Users, a Sentiment Rating Algorithm. In: Gero, J., Hanna, S. (eds) Design Computing and Cognition '14. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14956-1_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14956-1_27

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-14955-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-14956-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics