Abstract
Creative work can be performed by thousands of people who interact through collective design systems. The designers modify and combine each other’s work in a process called remixing. Remixing can catalyze innovation by allowing designers to build on each other’s ideas. For those designing collective design systems, decisions to be made about remixing are intertwined with decisions to be made about the visibility of work in the system – that is, the extent to which designers can see each other’s work. Visibility can be universally shared, or can be partitioned according to teams or interest groups. Even if all designs are made visible, some designs are more likely to be seen than others, depending on the methods of display. The interactions between remixing and other features of collective design systems are described, and suggestions are made towards improving these systems.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Thingiverse.com
- 2.
Scratch.mit.edu
- 3.
Mturk.com
- 4.
Innocentive.com
- 5.
Climatecolab.org
- 6.
Quirky.com
- 7.
Eterna.cmu.edu
References
Maher ML, Paulini M, Murty P (2011) Scaling up: from individual design to collaborative design to collective design. In: Design computing and cognition’10. 581–599. Springer
Visser W (1993) Collective design: a cognitive analysis of cooperation in practice. In: Proceedings of ICED. 93:pp 385–392
Fleming L, Mingo S, Chen D (2007) Collaborative brokerage, generative creativity, and creative success. Adm Sci Q 52:443–475
Kittur A, Nickerson JV, Bernstein MS, Gerber EM, Shaw AD, Zimmerman J, Lease M, Horton JJ (2013) The future of crowd work. In: 2013 ACM conference on computer supported collaborative work (CSCW’13)
Malone TW, Laubacher R, Dellarocas C (2009) Harnessing crowds: mapping the genome of collective intelligence. CCI Working Paper 2009-001, MIT
Quinn AJ, Bederson BB (2011) Human computation: a survey and taxonomy of a growing field. In: The 29th CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, ACM Press
Kyriakou H, Engelhardt S, Nickerson JV (2012) Networks of innovation in 3D printing. In: Workshop on information in networks
Nickerson JV, Monroy-Hernández A (2011) Appropriation and creativity: user-initiated contests in scratch. In: 44th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS’11)
Ipeirotis PG (2010) Analyzing the Amazon Mechanical Turk marketplace. XRDS Crossroads ACM Mag Stud 17:16–21
Lakhani K, Lonstein E (2012) InnoCentive. Com (B). Com (B) (August 17, 2011). Harvard Business School General Management Unit Case
Seneviratne O, Monroy-Hernandez A (2010) Remix culture on the web: a survey of content reuse on different user-generated content websites. In: Proceedings of WebSci10: extending the frontiers of society on-line
Tuite K, Smith AM, Studio EI (2012) Emergent remix culture in an anonymous collaborative art system. In: Eighth artificial intelligence and interactive digital entertainment conference
Cheliotis G, Yew J (2009) An analysis of the social structure of remix culture. In: Proceedings of the fourth international conference on communities and technologies, ACM
Kittur A, Chi E, Pendleton BA, Suh B, Mytkowicz T (2007) Power of the few vs. wisdom of the crowd: Wikipedia and the rise of the bourgeoisie. World Wide Web 1:19
Cranshaw J, Kittur A (2011) The polymath project: lessons from a successful online collaboration in mathematics. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM
Yu L, Nickerson JV (2013) An internet-scale idea generation system. ACM Trans Interact Intell Syst 3, Article 2
Gulley N (2001) Patterns of innovation: a web-based MATLAB programming contest. In: CHI’01 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. ACM
Introne J, Laubacher R, Olson G, Malone TW (2011) The climate CoLab: large scale model-based collaborative planning. In: 2011 international conference on collaboration technologies and systems (CTS’11)
Kosorukoff AL (2001) Human based genetic algorithm. In: Systems, man, and cybernetics, 2001 I.E. international conference on. 3464–3469, IEEE
Kosorukoff AL, Goldberg DE (2001) Genetic algorithms for social innovation and creativity, Illigal report No 2001005. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana
Yu L, Nickerson JV (2011) Cooks or cobblers? Crowd creativity through combination. In: The 29th CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1393–1402, ACM Press
Tanaka Y, Sakamoto Y, Kusumi T (2011) Conceptual combination versus critical combination: devising creative solutions using the sequential application of crowds. Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society
Pirolli P, Card S (1995) Information foraging in information access environments. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pp 51–58, ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co
Bonney R, Cooper CB, Dickinson J, Kelling S, Phillips T, Rosenberg KV, Shirk J (2009) Citizen science: a developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy. Bioscience 59:977–984
Raddick MJ, Bracey G, Gay PL, Lintott CJ, Murray P, Schawinski K, Szalay AS, Vandenberg J (2009) Galaxy zoo: exploring the motivations of citizen science volunteers. arXiv preprint arXiv:0909.2925
Wiggins A, Crowston K (2011) From conservation to crowdsourcing: a typology of citizen science. In: System Sciences (HICSS), 2011 44th Hawaii international conference on
Rowles TA (2013) Power to the people: does eterna signal the arrival of a new wave of crowd-sourced projects? BMC Biochem 14:26
Teodoro R, Ozturk P, Naaman M, Mason W, Lindqvist J (2014) The motivations and experiences of the on-demand mobile workforce, CSCW
Kriplean T, Beschastnikh I, McDonald DW (2008) Articulations of wikiwork: uncovering valued work in Wikipedia through barnstars. In: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work. Vol. 47–56, ACM
Simon HA (1996) The sciences of the artificial. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ Sci 2:71–87
Benner M, Waldfogel J (2008) Close to you? Bias and precision in patent-based measures of technological proximity. Res Policy 37:1556–1567
McNamee RC (2013) Can’t see the forest for the leaves: similarity and distance measures for hierarchical taxonomies with a patent classification example. Res Policy 42:855–873
Nickerson JV, Corter JE, Tversky B, Rho Y-J, Zahner D, Yu L (2013) Cognitive tools shape thought: diagrams in design. Cogn Process 14:255–272
Genc Y, Sakamoto Y, Nickerson JV (2011) Discovering context: classifying tweets through a semantic transform based on Wikipedia. In: Foundations of augmented cognition. Directing the future of adaptive systems Springer, pp 484–492
Lakhani KR, Boudreau KJ, Loh P-R, Backstrom L, Baldwin C, Lonstein E, Lydon M, MacCormack A, Arnaout RA, Guinan EC (2013) Prize-based contests can provide solutions to computational biology problems. Nat Biotechnol 31:108–111
Ozturk P, Han Y (2014) Similar yet diverse: a recommender system. In: Collective intelligence
Acknowledgements
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under grants 0968561 and 1211084.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Nickerson, J.V. (2015). Collective Design: Remixing and Visibility. In: Gero, J., Hanna, S. (eds) Design Computing and Cognition '14. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14956-1_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14956-1_15
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-14955-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-14956-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)