Imaging in Malignancy of the Oral Cavity and Role of PET CT in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck Region

  • Venkatraman BhatEmail author
  • H. V. Sunil


Imaging plays a vital role in obtaining accurate, reproducible information about a lesion in an anatomically complex body region. Precise imaging information built on the requirements of clinical management strategies are needed for patient management and subsequent follow-up. The choice of appropriate imaging methods is equally as important for obtaining the required information and optimizing resource utilization. This review provides the basis and pathway for interpreting normal and pathological imaging observations of oral cavity lesions


Oral Cavity Infratemporal Fossa Masticator Space Pterygopalatine Fossa Nodal Assessment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Imaging in Malignancy of the Oral Cavity

  1. 1.
    Law CP, Chandra V, Hoang K, Phal PM. Imaging the oral cavity: key concepts for the radiologist. Br J Radiol. 2011;84:944–57.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Harnsberger HR, Osborn AG. Differential diagnosis of head and neck lesions based on their space of origin. 1. The suprahyoid part of the neck. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1991;157:147–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stambuk HE, Karimi S, Lee N, Patel SG. Oral cavity and oropharynx tumors. Radiol Clin North Am. 2007;45:1–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Harnsberger HR. Introduction to suprahyoid neck. In: Handbook of head and neck imaging. 2nd ed. Saint Louis: Mosby; 1995. p. 8–28. Uterus is surgically absent.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Osborn AG. Radiology of the pterygoid plates and pterygopalatine fossa. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1979;132:389–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Curtin HD, Williams R. Computed tomographic anatomy of the pterygopalatine fossa. Radiographics. 1985;5(3):429–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Arya S, Rane P, Deshmukh A. Oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: role of pretreatment imaging and its influence on management. Clin Radiol. 2014;69(9):916–30. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2014.04.013.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shah JP, Gil Z. Current concepts in management of oral cancer surgery. Oral Oncol. 2009;45:394–401.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Genden EM, Ferlito A, Silver CE, Takes RP, Suarez C, Owen RP, Haigentz Jr M, Stoeckli SJ, Shaha AR, Rapidis AD, Rodrigo JP, Rinaldo A. Contemporary management of cancer of the oral cavity. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2010;267:1001–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ayad T, Guertin L, Soulières D, et al. Controversies in the management of retromolar trigone carcinoma. Head Neck. 2009;31:398–405.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Asakage T, Yokose T, Mukai K, Tsugane S, Tsubono Y, Asai M, Ebihara S. Tumor thickness predicts cervical metastasis in patients with stage I/II carcinoma of the tongue. Cancer. 1998;82:1443–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Patel RS, Clark JR, Dirven R, Wyten R, Gao K, O’Brien CJ. Prognostic factors in the surgical treatment of patients with oral carcinoma. ANZ J Surg. 2009;79:19–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Alvi A, Johnson JT. Extracapsular spread in the clinically negative neck (N0): implications and outcome. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996;114:65–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ouyang T, Branstetter IV BF. Advances in headand neck imaging. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2010;22:107–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bhat V, Kuppuswamy M, Santosh Kumar DG, Bhat V, Karthik GA. Pneumoparotid in “puffed cheek” computed tomography: incidence and relation to oropharyngeal conditions. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;53(3):239–43. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2014.11.019. Epub 2014 Dec 24. PubMed PMID: 25542285
  16. 16.
    Henrot P, Blum A, Toussaint B. Dynamic maneuvers in local staging of head and neck malignancies with current imaging techniques: principles and clinical applications. Radiographics. 2003;23:1201–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Weisman RA, Kimmelman CP. Bone scanning in the assessment of mandibular invasion by oral cavity carcinomas. Laryngoscope. 1982;92:1–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Handschel J, Naujoks C, Depprich RA, et al. CT-scan is a valuable tool to detect mandibular involvement in oral cancer patients. Oral Oncol. 2012;48:361–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dreiseidler T, Alarabi N, Ritter L, et al. A comparison of multislice computerized tomography, cone-beam computerized tomography, and single photon emission computerized tomography for the assessment of bone invasion by oral malignancies. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011;112:367–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hendrikx AW, Maal T, Dieleman F, et al. Cone-beam CT in the assessment of mandibular invasion by oral squamous cell carcinoma: results of the preliminary study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;39:436–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gu DH, Yoon DY, Park CH, et al. CT, MR, F-FDG PET/CT, and their combined use for the assessment of mandibular invasion by squamous cell carcinomas of the oral cavity. Acta Radiol. 2010;51:1111–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Curran AJ, Toner M, Quinn A, et al. Mandibular invasion diagnosed by SPECT. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1996;21:542–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mukherji SK, Isaacs DL, Creager A, et al. CT detection of mandibular invasion by squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;177:237–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Brockenbrough JM, Petruzzelli GJ, Lomasney L. Denta- scan as an accurate method of predicting mandibular invasion in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;129:113–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Abd El-Hafez YG, Chen CC, Ng SH, et al. Comparison of PET/CT and MRI for the detection of bone marrow invasion in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. Oral Oncol. 2011;47:288–95.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Van Cann EM, Koole R, Oyen WJ, et al. Assessment of mandibular invasion of squamous cell carcinoma by various modes of imaging: constructing a diagnostic algorithm. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;37:535–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Van Cann EM, Oyen WJ, Koole R, et al. Bone SPECT reduces the number of unnecessary mandibular resections in patients with squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2006;42:409–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bolzoni A, Cappiello J, Piazza C, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of mandibular involvement in oral-oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective study. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130:837–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Leslie A, Fyfe E, Guest P, Goddard P, Kabala JE. Staging of squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity and oropharynx: a comparison of MRI and CT in T- and N-staging. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1999;23:43–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sigal R, Zagdanski AM, Schwaab G, et al. CT and MR imaging of squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue and floor of the mouth. Radiographics. 1996;16:787–810.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Dammann F, Horger M, Mueller-Berg M, et al. Rational diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck region: comparative evaluation of CT, MRI, and 18FDG PET. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;184:1326–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kimura Y, Sumi M, Sumi T, et al. Deep extension from carcinoma arising from the gingiva: CT and MR imaging features. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002;23:468–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Yen TC, Chang JT, Ng SH, et al. Staging of untreated squamous cell carcinoma of buccal mucosa with 18F-FDG PET: comparison with head and neck CT/MRI and histopathology. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:775–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ng SH, Yen TC, Liao CT, et al. 18F-FDG PET and CT/MRI in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective study of 124 patients with histologic correlation. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:1136–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Huang SH, Chien CY, Lin WC, et al. A comparative study of fused FDG PET/MRI, PET/CT, MRI, and CT imaging for assessing surrounding tissue invasion of advanced buccal squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Nucl Med. 2011;36:518–25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Som PM, Brandwein-Gensler MS. Lymph nodes of the neck. In: Som PM, Curtin HD, editors. Head & neck imaging, vol. 2. 5th ed. St Louis: Mosby; 2011. p. 2287–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    deBondt RB, Nelemans PJ, Hofman PA, et al. Detection of lymph node metastases in head and neck cancer: a meta-analysis comparing US, USg FNAC, CT and MR imaging. Eur J Radiol. 2007;64:266–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wu LM, Xu JR, Liu MJ, et al. Value of magnetic resonance imaging for nodal staging in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis. Acad Radiol. 2012;19:331–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kyzas PA, Evangelou E, Denaxa-Kyza D, et al. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to evaluate cervical node metastases in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100:712–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Liao LJ, Lo WC, Hsu WL, et al. Detection of cervical lymph node metastasis in head and neck cancer patients with clinically N0 neck. Meta-analysis comparing different imaging modalities. BMC Cancer. 2012;12:236.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Patel SG, Shah JP. TNM staging of cancers of the head and neck: striving for uniformity among diversity. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005;55:242–58. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.55.4.242.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Yousem DM, Som PM, Hackney DB, et al. Central nodal necrosis and extracapsular neoplastic spread in cervical lymph nodes: MR imaging versus CT. Radiology. 1992;182:753–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Imaizumi A, Yoshino N, Yamada I, et al. A potential pitfall of MR imaging for assessing mandibular invasion of squamous cell carcinoma in the oral cavity. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;27:114–22.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    van den Brekel MW, Runne RW, Smeele LE, Tiwari RM, Snow GB, Castelijns JA. Assessment of tumour invasion into the mandible: the value of different imaging techniques. Eur Radiol. 1998;8:1552–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Lane AP, Buckmire RA, Mukherji SK, Pillsbury 3rd HC, Meredith SD. Use of computed tomography in the assessment of mandibular invasion in carcinoma of the retromolar trigone. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;122:673–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Goerres GW, Schmid DT, Schuknecht B, et al. Bone invasion in patients with oral cavity cancer: comparison of conventional CT with PET/CT and SPECT/CT. Radiology. 2005;237:281–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Okura M, Iida S, Aikawa T, Adachi T, Yoshimura N, Yamada T, et al. Tumor thickness and paralingual distance of coronal MR imaging predicts cervical node metastases in oral tongue carcinoma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:45–50.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Arya S, Chaukar D, Pai P. Imaging in oral cancers. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2012;22:195–208.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Curtin HD, Ishwaran H, Mancuso AA, Dalley RW, Caudry DJ, McNeil BJ. Comparison of CT and MR imaging in staging of neck metastases. Radiology. 1998;207:123–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    van den Brekel MW, Castelijns JA, Stel HV, Golding RP, Meyer CJ, Snow GB. Modern imaging techniques and ultrasound- guided aspiration cytology for the assessment of neck node metastases: a prospective comparative study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1993;250:11–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Takes RP, Righi P, Meeuwis CA, Manni JJ, Knegt P, Marres HA, Spoelstra HA, de Boer MF, van der Mey AG, Bruaset I, Ball V, Weisberger E, Radpour S, Kruyt RH, Joosten FB, Lameris JS, van Oostayen JA, Kopecky K, Caldemeyer K, Henzen-Logmans SC, Wiersma-van Tilburg JM, Bosman FT, van Krieken JH, Hermans J, de Baatenburg Jong RJ. The value of ultrasound with ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy compared to computed tomography in the detection of regional metastases in the clinically negative neck. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998;40:1027–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Mann WJ, Beck A, Schreiber J, et al. Ultrasonography for evaluation of the carotid artery in head and neck cancer. Laryngoscope. 1994;104:885–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

PET CT in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck Region: A Pictorial Review

  1. 53.
    Delbeke D, et al. Procedure guideline for tumor imaging with 18F-FDG PET/CT 1.0*. SNM procedure guidelines for FDG PET CT, version 1.
  2. 54.
    Al-Ibraheem A, Buck A, Krause BJ, Scheidhauer K, Schwaiger M. Clinical applications of FDG PET and PET/CT in head and neck cancer. J Oncol. 2009;2009:1–3.Google Scholar
  3. 55.
    Quon A, Fischbein NJ, McDougall IR, Le QT, Loo Jr BW, Pinto H, Kaplan MJ. Clinical role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the management of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck and thyroid carcinoma. J Nucl Med. 2007;48 Suppl 1:58S–67.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 56.
    Scott AM, Gunawardana DH, Bartholomeusz D, Ramshaw JE, Lin P. PET changes management and improves prognostic stratification in patients with head and neck cancer: results of a multicenter prospective study. J Nucl Med. 2008;49(10):1593–600.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 57.
    Schöder H, Fury M, Lee N, Kraus D. PET monitoring of therapy response in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. J Nucl Med. 2009;50 Suppl 1:74S–88.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 58.
    Ciernick IF, Dizendorf E, et al. Radiation treatment planning with an integrated positron emission and computer tomography (PET/CT): a feasibility study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;57(1):853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ImagingMazumdar Shaw Medical CentreBengaluruIndia
  2. 2.Department of Nuclear MedicineMazumdar Shaw Cancer Centre, Narayana Health City, FDI CareBengaluruIndia

Personalised recommendations