Skip to main content

Perineal Trauma: A Historical and International Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Perineal Trauma at Childbirth
  • 1188 Accesses

Abstract

Review of historical literature confirms that perineal injury has occurred during childbirth throughout the ages and that various methods and material were used by accoucheurs in an attempt to restore the integrity of severely traumatised tissue. Perineal stitching following childbirth was advocated in ancient writings on midwifery and obstetrics, however the procedure was not routinely practiced.

Women remained the prominent figure during confinements in the early centuries and male physicians or barber-surgeons were only called in as a last resort if problems occurred. During the eighteenth century the introduction of forceps together with episiotomy to facilitate difficult deliveries had a major impact on the extent of perineal trauma and its subsequent repair. Furthermore, women were encouraged to deliver in a more supine position rather than upright so the perineum was more accessible and the full extent of perineal trauma sustained could be assessed. During this period more attention was made to minimising perineal trauma and various methods including supporting the perineum and applying pressure to the vertex to prevent rapid expulsion were implemented. By the end of the nineteenth century practitioners were advised to suture all perineal trauma. However, it was not until the early twentieth century that local anaesthetic was advocated to ease the pain prior to performing and suturing episiotomies. In the UK, midwives did not receive any formal training until the late eighteenth century and it was not until the late twentieth century that midwives were permitted to undertake perineal suturing.

“May the lessons of the past be a guide to the future”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Audit Commission. First class delivery: improving maternity services in England and Wales. London: Audit Commission Publications; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beatty TE. Contributions to medicine and midwifery. Dublin: Fannin and Co.; 1866. p. 567.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bender S. Obstetrics for pupil midwives. London: William Heinemann Medical Books Limited; 1968. p. 159.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Black JW. Selected obstetrical & gynaecological works of Sir James Y. Simpson, Bart. Edinburgh: Adam and Charles Black; 1871. p. 65.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Catalogue and report of obstetrical and other instruments. London: Longmans, Green and Co.; 1867. p. 172.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Christhilf SM, Monias MB. Knotless episiorrhaphy as a positive approach towards eliminating postpartum perineal distress. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1962;84(6):812–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. DeLee JB. Obstetrics for nurses. Philadelphia: W.B.Saunders; 1904.

    Google Scholar 

  8. DeLee JB. The prophylactic forceps operation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1920;1:34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Derry DE. Note on five pelves of women of the Eleventh Dynasty in Egypt. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp. 1935;xiii:490–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Detlefsen GU, Vinther S, Larsen P, Schroeder E. Intradermal suturing of episiotomy wounds compared with interrupted sutures (transl). Ugeskr Laeger. 1980;142:3117–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Donald I. Practical obstetric problems. London: Lloyd-Luke; 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Eccles A. Obstetrics and gynaecology in Tudor and Stuart England. 1st ed. London: Croom Helm Ltd; 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fleming N. Comparison of women with different perineal conditions after childbirth. Ann Arbor: UMI; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fleming N. Can the suturing method make a difference in postpartum perineal pain? J Nurse-Midwifery. 1990;35(1):19–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Floud E. Protecting the perineum in childbirth 1: a retrospective view. Br J Midwifery. 1994;2(6):258–63.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Flood C. The real reason for performing episiotomies. World Med. 1982;17:51.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gelis J. History of childbirth. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Graham H. Eternal eve. Britain: William Heinemann Medical Books LTD; 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Greenshields W, ulme H H. The perineum in childbirth: a survey of women’s experiences and midwifery practices. London: National Childbirth Trust; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Guilhem P, Pontonnier A, Espagno G. Episiotomie prophylactique. Suture intradermique. Gynecol Obstet. 1960;59(2):261–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Guillemeau J. Child-birth or the happy deliverie of women. London: Printed by A Hatfield; 1612.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Harvie J. Practicle directions, shewing ‘A Method of pefering the PERINǼUM IN BIRTH’. Printed for D. Wilson and G Nicol, London; 1767.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Herman GE. Difficult labour. A guide to its management for students and practitioners. London: Cassell and Company, Limited; 1898.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Isager-Sally L, Legarth J, Jacobsen B, Bostofte E. Episiotomy repair – immediate and long-term sequelae. A prospective randomized study of three different methods of repair. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1986;93:420–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Jellett H. A short practice of midwifery, embodying the treatment adopted in the Rotunda Hospital, Dublin. London: J & A Churchill; 1897. p. 282–36.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kettle C, Hills RK, Jones P, Darby L, Gray R, Johanson R. Continuous versus interrupted perineal repair with standard or rapidly absorbed sutures after spontaneous vaginal birth: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2002;359(9325):2217–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kitzinger S, Walters R. Some women’s experience of episiotomy. London: National Childbirth Trust; 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Llewellyn-Jones JD. Commentary. Repair of episiotomies and perineal tears. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1987;94:92–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Magdi I. Obstetric injuries of the perineum. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1949;49:687–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Mandy TE, Christhilf SM, Mandy AJ, Siegel IA. Evaluation of the Rucker method of episiotomy repair as to perineal pain. Am J Surg. 1951;82:251–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Myerscough PR. Munro Kerr’s operative obstetrics. 9th ed. London: Bailliére Tindall; 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  32. O’Dowd MJ, Philipp E. The history of obstetrics and gynecology. New York: The Parthenon Publishing Group; 2000.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  33. Olah KS. Subcuticular perineal repair using a new continuous technique. Br J Midwifery. 1994;2(2):67–71.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ould F. A treatise of midwifery. Dublin: Nelson and Connor; 1742.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Pomeroy RH. Shall we cut and reconstruct the perineum for every primipara? Am J Obstet Dis Woman Child. 1918;78:211–20.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Radcliffe W. Milestones in midwifery. Bristol: John Wright & Sons Ltd; 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Rhodes P. A short history of clinical midwifery. 1st ed. Cheshire: Books for Midwives Press; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Rucker MP. Perineorraphy with longitudinal sutures. Virginia Med Mon. 1930;7:238–9.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Taliaferro RM. Rigidity of soft parts: delivery effected by incision in the perineum. Stethoscope Vaginia Med Gaz. 1852;2:383.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Temkin O. Soranus’ gynaecology. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press; 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Thacker SB, Banta HD. Benefits and risks of episiotomy: an interpretative review of the English language literature 1860–1980. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1983;38(6):322–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Tew M. Safer childbirth? A critical history of maternity care. London: Chapman and Hall; 1990. p. 116.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Towler J, Bramall J. Midwives in history and society. Kent: Croom Helm Ltd; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christine Kettle .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kettle, C., Ismail, K. (2016). Perineal Trauma: A Historical and International Perspective. In: Ismail, K. (eds) Perineal Trauma at Childbirth. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14860-1_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14860-1_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-14859-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-14860-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics