Abstract
This chapter is the international comparison between Beijing (a representative of one of China’s primary cities intending to clear up slums) and São Paulo (a typical Latin American primary city in an electoral democracy) in terms of slum landscapes and policies. The former is an example of one of China’s slum-free planned cities; the latter is representative of the Brazilian style with a spectacular spatial concentration of urban poverty in the primary cities. The study evidences some similarities in the inadequate supply of public housing, such as a shortfall in budget to fund public services and inequitable access to welfare among developing countries that experience a high speed of urbanization and city growth. The chapter identifies the features of both China’s land-based public financing and hukou-based public spending systems, within which the land reinvestment and leasing fees serve as a major source of municipal revenue. The function of city and property as a wealth generator explains the contrasting outcomes of space production and city life in Brazil and China.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The ‘lost decade’ of the 1980s in São Paulo saw a rapid growth of shantytowns in the urban periphery, namely favelas, and inner-city slum tenements, known as cortiços. The favela became the dominating São Paulo slum type at the beginning of the 1980s, when it began to spread all over the city. The favela is, in general, a squatter settlement type of accommodation representing an illegal market—an owner-occupied structure located on the squatted or invaded lands and without security of tenure—while the cortiço is, generally, inner-city, dilapidated rental accommodation that is a legal market. Unlike the cortiço dweller, who is subject to the laws of the market, to rent and pay for services, favela dwellers are seen as having ‘an easy life’, not paying for anything. Favela is built with inadequate materials (old wood, tin, cans and even cardboard, etc.) distributed irregularly in lots, almost always lacking urban and social services and equipment (see United Nations Human Settlements Programme 2003: 226).
- 2.
But the public investment and spending remain a quite small portion of the whole fiscal cake, as about 63 % of Brazil’s tax receipts are in the hands of the federal government, 14 % for the municipal administrations and 23 % for the state governments which are also responsible for education, health and policing (Iain 2004).
- 3.
One such case was the ‘scissor’s gap’ policy, in use before the pro-market reforms, which had artificially kept down the purchasing prices for farm products in order to allow cities and industry to develop, using cheap goods as inputs (see Zhou 1997: 24).
- 4.
Zhaijidi is the rural housing land that is owned collectively by the village and allocated to its members. The allocation of Zhaijidi is determined administratively by need, is free of charge, and is inherited in most cases (see Wang and Murie 1999). Self-help within the family is the main means of constructing citizens’ housing. The State Council, since 1982, has issued the Village Housing Development and Land Use Management Ordinance plans in order to stipulate rural housing land-use standards for different provinces/regions.
References
Ananya R (2005) Urban informality: toward an epistemology of planning. J Am Plann Assoc 71(2):147–158
Ananya R (2012) Urban informality: the production of space and practice of planning. In: Weber R, Crane R (eds) The Oxford handbook of urban planning. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 691–705
Ananya R, Nezar AS (2004) Urban informality: transnational perspectives from the Middle East, Latin America, and South Asia. Lexington Books, Boulder
Andreas N, Bernhard L (2005) Participatory budgeting in Porto Alegre: social innovation and the dialectical relationship of state and civil society. Urban Stud 42(11):2023–2036
Arnal E, Fõrster M (2010) Growth, employment and inequality in Brazil, China, India and South Africa: an overview. OECD working paper. www.oecd.org/employment/employmentpoliciesanddata/45282661.pdf. Accessed 3 Aug 2014
Au CC, Henderson V (2004) How migration restrictions limit agglomeration and productivity in China. http://www.econ.brown.edu/faculty/henderson/papers/china402.pdf. Accessed 3 Aug 2014
Au CC, Henderson V (2006) Are Chinese cities too small? Rev Econ Stud 73(2):549–576
Baiocchi G (2005) Militants and citizens: the politics of participatory democracy in Porto Alegre. Stanford University Press, Stanford
Beijing Municipal Bureau of Statistics (2011) Beijing statistical yearbook. China Statistics Press, Beijing
Bird RM, Slack E (2004) International handbook on land and property taxation. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
Brazil’s National Census (2010) 2010 population census. http://www.ibge.gov.br/english/estatistica/populacao/censo2010/. Accessed 3 Aug 2014
Brenner N (2001) Entrepreneurial cities, ‘glocalizing’ states and the new politics of scale. Working paper. http://artefact.mi2.hr/_a04/lang_en/theory_brenner_en.htm. Accessed 3 Aug 2014
Cabannes Y (2004) Participatory budgeting: a significant contribution to participatory democracy. Environ Urban 16:27–46
Caldeira T (2000) City of walls: crime, segregation, and citizenship in São Paulo. University of California Press, Berkeley/Los Angeles
Caldeira T, Holston J (2005) State and urban space in Brazil: from modernist planning to democratic interventions. In: Ong A, Collier SJ (eds) Global assemblages: technology, politics, and ethics as anthropological problems. Blackwell, Cambridge, pp 393–416
Cao GZ, Feng CC, Tao R (2008) Local ‘land finance’ in China’s urban expansion: challenges and solutions. China World Econ 16(2):19–30
Chan KW (2009) The Chinese hukou system at 50. Eurasian Geogr Econ 50(2):197–221
Chan KW (2010) Fundamentals of China’s urbanization and policy. China Rev 10(1):63–94
ChinaDaily (2010) Methods suggested to ward off more migrants in Beijing. http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2010-08/03/content_11088780.htm. Accessed 3 Aug 2014
Cook IG (2006) Beijing as an ‘internationalized metropolis’. In: Wu FL (ed) Globalization and the Chinese city. Routledge, New York, pp 63–84
Cunha AS (2011) The social function of property in Brazilian Law. Fordham Law Rev 80(3):1171–1181
Davis M (2006) Planet of slums. Verso, New York
De Soto H (1989) The other path: the invisible revolution in the third world. I. B. Tauris, London
De Soto H (2000) The mystery of capital: why capitalism triumphs in the West and fails everywhere else. Basic Books, New York
Deak C (2001) São Paulo. In: Carmona M, Burgess R (eds) Strategic planning & urban projects/responses to globalisation from 15 cities. Delft University Press, Deft, pp 173–82 (text) & 282–88 (illustrations)
Deak C, Schiffer S (2007) São Paulo: the metropolis of an elite society. In: Segbers K (ed) The making of global city regions: Johannesburg, Mumbai/Bombay, São Paulo, and Shanghai. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp 85–112
Deng FF, Huang YQ (2004) Uneven land reform and urban sprawl in China: the case of Beijing. Prog Plan 61(3):211–236
Ding CR (2007) Policy and praxis of land acquisition in China. Land Use Policy 24(1):1–13
Earle L (2011) Irregular urbanization as a catalyst for radical social mobilization: the case of the housing movements of São Paulo. Working paper of World Institute for Development Economics Research (WIDER)
Eckstein S (1990) Urbanization revisited: inner-city slums of hope and squatter settlement of despair. World Dev 18(2):165–181
Economist (2012) Capital controversy: China’s ‘overinvestment’ problem may be greatly overstated. http://www.economist.com/node/21552555. Accessed 3 Aug 2014
Edésio F (2007) Constructing the ‘right to the city’ in Brazil. Soc Leg Stud 16(2):201–219
Esther HM (2010) Social inclusion through participation: the case of the participatory budget in São Paulo. Int J Urban Reg Res 34(3):512–532
Germani G (1973) Modernization, urbanization, and the urban crisis. Little, Brown & Co., New York
Ghertner DA (2008) An analysis of new legal discourse behind Delhi’s slum demolitions. Econ Pol Wkly 43(20):57–66
Gilbert A, Gugler J (1993) Cities, poverty and development. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Goldfrank B (2007) Lessons from Latin American experiences in participatory budgeting. In: Shah A (ed) Participatory budgeting. World Bank Institute, Washington, DC
Gu CL, Wang FH, Liu GL (2005) The structure of social space in Beijing in 1998: a socialist city in transition. Urban Geogr 26(2):167–192
Gugler J (1988) Overurbanization reconsidered. In: Gugler J (ed) The urbanization of the third world. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 74–92
Gulyani S (2010) The living conditions diamond: an analytical and theoretical framework for understanding slums. Environ Plan A 42:2201–2219
Haroldo T, Humberto A, De Oliveira MA (2007) São Paulo peri-urban dynamics: some social causes and environmental consequences. Environ Urban 19(1):207–223
Harvey D (1989) From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: the transformation in urban governance in late capitalism. Geogr Ann B Hum Geogr 71(1):3–17
Harvey D (2005) A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Harvey D (2008) The right to the city. New Left Rev 53:23–40
He SJ, Liu YT, Webster C, Wu FL (2009) Property rights redistribution, entitlement failure and the impoverishment of landless farmers in China. Urban Stud 46(9):1925–1949
Healey P (2003) Collaborative planning in perspective. Plann Theory 2(2):101–123
Healey P (2007) Urban complexity and spatial strategies towards a relational planning for our times. Routledge, New York
Henderson JV (2009) Urbanization in China: policy issues and options. China Economic Research and Advisory Programme. http://www.econ.brown.edu/faculty/henderson/finalfinalreport-2007050221.pdf. Accessed 3 Aug 2014
Henderson JV, Wang HG (2007) Urbanization and city growth: The role of institutions. Reg Sci Urban Econ 37(3):283–313
Heston A, Summers R, Aten B (2010) Data on the world GDP. http://pwt.econ.upenn.edu/. Accessed 3 Aug 2014
Holston J (2008) Insurgent citizenship: disjunctions of democracy and modernity in Brazil. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Hsing YT (2010) The great urban transformation: politics of land and property in China. Oxford University Press, New York
Iain B (2004) The Porto Alegre alternative: direct democracy in action. Pluto Press, London
Indermit GS, Goh CC (2010) Scale economies and cities. World Bank Res Obs 25(2):235–262
Lefebvre H (1991) The production of space. Blackwell, Oxford
Lewis WA (1977) The evolution of the international economic order. Working paper of Woodrow Wilson School, Princeton University. http://www.princeton.edu/rpds/papers/WP_74.pdf. Accessed 3 Aug 2014
Lin GCS (2007) Chinese urbanism in question: state, society, and the reproduction of urban spaces. Urban Geogr 28(1):7–29
Lin GCS (2009a) Developing China: land, politics and social conditions. Routledge, London
Lin GCS (2009b) Scaling-up regional development in globalizing China: local capital accumulation, land-centred politics, and reproduction of space. Reg Stud 43(3):429–447
Lin GCS (2010) Understanding land development problems in globalizing China. Eurasian Geogr Econ 51(1):80–103
Liu R, Wong TC, Liu SH (2012) Peasants’ counterplots against the state monopoly of the rural urbanization process: urban villages and ‘small property housing’ in Beijing, China. Environ Plan A 44:1219–1240
Lou JW, Wang SL (2008) Public finance in China: reform and growth for a harmonious society. World Bank, Washington, DC
Ma LJC (2002) Urban transformation in China, 1949–2000: a review and research agenda. Environ Plan A 34:1545–1569
Magalhães F, Villarosa F (2012) Slum upgrading: lessons learned from Brazil. Working paper of Inter-American Development Bank
Man JYY, Hong YH (2010) China’s local public finance in transition. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA
Martine G, McGranahan G (2010) Brazil’s early urban transition: what can it teach urbanizing countries? IIED and UNFPA working paper. http://sa.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/Brazils%20early%20urban%20transition.pdf. Accessed 3 Aug 2014
Mauro BL, Thiago C, Verônica LC (2007) Urbanization and rural-urban linkages: the Brazilian experience of late industrialization. Working paper. http://www.iica.int/Esp/regiones/sur/brasil/Lists/DocumentosTecnicosAbertos/Attachments/408/artigo_Mauro_Borges_Lemos.pdf. Accessed 3 Aug 2014
Morse R (1992) Rethinking the Latin American city. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
Ngai P (2006) Finding a right to the city: exploring property and community in Brazil and in the United States. Vanderbilt J Transnational Law 39(2):435–479
Ngai P (2008) The right to the city. Harv Black Lett Law J 24:69–71
Nitikin D, Shen CL, Wang Q, Zou HF (2012) Land taxation in China: assessment of prospects for politically and economically sustainable reform. Ann Econ Financ 13(2):497–521
Oates WE (2006) On the theory and practice of fiscal decentralization. Working paper. http://www.ifigr.org/publication/ifir_working_papers/IFIR-WP-2006-05.pdf. Accessed 3 Aug 2014
Santos M (1996) São Paulo: a growth process full of contradictions. In: Gilbert A (ed) The mega-city in Latin America. United Nations University Press, Tokyo
Simone JB (2014) Labour in a globalizing city: economic restructuring in São Paulo, Brazil. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland
Sintomer Y, Carsten H, Anja R (2005) From Porto Alegre to Europe: potentials and limitations of participatory budgeting. Working paper of the Informal Development Partners Working Group on Local Governance and Decentralisation. http://www.participatorybudgeting.org.uk/documents/From-Porto-Alegre%20-%20potential%20-%20limits%20of%20PB.pdf. Accessed 3 Aug 2014
Standing Committee (1998) Land administrative law of the People’s Republic of China, the 9th National People’s Congress of the People’s Republic of China (1st revision). Standing Committee, Beijing
Standing Committee (2004) Land administrative law of the People’s Republic of China, the 11th National People’s Congress of the People’s Republic of China (2nd revision). Standing Committee, Beijing
Tao R, Su FB, Liu MX, Cao GZ (2010) Land leasing and local public finance in China’s regional development: evidence from prefecture-level cities. Urban Stud 47(10):2217–2236
UN-HABITAT (2001) Implementing the habitat agenda: the 1996–2001 experience. Report on the Istanbul Thematic Committee 25th special session of the United Nations General Assembly, New York
UN-HABITAT (2010) São Paulo: a tale of two cities. Working paper of United Nations Human Settlements Programme
United Nations (2010) Urban trends: urbanization and economic growth. UN Habitat Report. http://www.unhabitat.org/documents/SOWC10/R7.pdf. Accessed 3 Aug 2014
United Nations (2012) World urbanization prospects: the 2011 revision highlights. http://esa.un.org/unup/pdf/WUP2011_Highlights.pdf. Accessed 3 Aug 2014
United Nations Human Settlements Programme (2003) The challenge of slums: global report on human settlements 2003. Earthscan, London/Sterling
Wacquant L (2007) Urban outcasts: a comparative sociology of advanced marginality. Polity Press, Cambridge
Wampler B (2007) Participatory budgeting in Brazil: contestation, cooperation, and accountability. Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park
Wang YP, Murie A (1999) Housing policy and practice in China. Palgrave Macmillan, London
Wang YM, Scott S (2008) Illegal farmland conversion in China’s urban periphery: local regime and national transitions. Urban Geogr 29(4):327–347
Watson V (2009) Seeing from the South: refocusing urban planning on the globe’s central urban issues. Urban Stud 46(11):2259–2275
Wong C (2011) The fiscal stimulus program and problems of macroeconomic management in China. OECD J Budg 3:1–24
Wong C (2012) Paying for urbanization: challenges for China’s municipal finance in the 21st century. In: Bahl R, Linn J, Wetzel D (eds) Metropolitan government finances in developing countries. Lincoln Institute for Land Policy, Cambridge, MA
World Bank (2003) Case study 2—Porto Alegre, Brazil: participatory approaches in budgeting and public expenditure management. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/11309. Accessed 3 Aug 2014
World Bank (2010) São Paulo case study overview: climate disaster risk and the urban poor: cities building resilience for a changing world. Working paper. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTURBANDEVELOPMENT/Resources/336387-1306291319853/CS_Sao_Paulo.pdf. Accessed 3 Aug 2014
World Bank (2009) World development report 2009: reshaping economic geography. World Bank, Washington, DC
Wu FL (2004) Transplanting cityscapes: the use of imagined globalization in housing commodification in Beijing. Area 36(3):227–234
Yang DYR, Wang HK (2008) Dilemmas of local governance under the development zone fever in China: a case study of the Suzhou region. Urban Stud 45(5–6):1037–1054
Zhang L (2004) China’s limited urbanization under socialism and beyond. Nova, New York
Zhou DM (1997) On rural urbanization in China. In: Gregory EG (ed) Farewell to peasant China: rural urbanization and social change in the late twentieth century. M.E. Sharpe, London, pp 13–46
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Liu, R. (2015). Building the Globalizing City With or Without Slums?—Exploring the Contrast Between City Models in São Paulo and Beijing. In: Spatial Mobility of Migrant Workers in Beijing, China. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14738-3_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14738-3_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-14737-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-14738-3
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)