Skip to main content

Stability, Supportedness, Minimality and Kleene Answer Set Programs

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 9060))

Abstract

Answer Set Programming is a widely known knowledge representation framework based on the logic programming paradigm that has been extensively studied in the past decades. The semantic framework for Answer Set Programs is based on the use of stable model semantics. There are two characteristics intrinsically associated with the construction of stable models for answer set programs. Any member of an answer set is supported through facts and chains of rules and those members are in the answer set only if generated minimally in such a manner. These two characteristics, supportedness and minimality, provide the essence of stable models. Additionally, answer sets are implicitly partial and that partiality provides epistemic overtones to the interpretation of disjunctive rules and default negation. This paper is intended to shed light on these characteristics by defining a semantic framework for answer set programming based on an extended first-order Kleene logic with weak and strong negation. Additionally, a definition of strongly supported models is introduced, separate from the minimality assumption explicit in stable models. This is used to both clarify and generate alternative semantic interpretations for answer set programs with disjunctive rules in addition to answer set programs with constraint rules. An algorithm is provided for computing supported models and comparative complexity results between strongly supported and stable model generation are provided.

This work is partially supported by the Swedish Research Council (VR) Linnaeus Center CADICS, the ELLIIT network organization for Information and Communication Technology, the Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research (CUAS Project), the EU FP7 project SHERPA (grant agreement 600958), and Vinnova NFFP6 Project 2013-01206.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alviano, M., Faber, W., Leone, N., Perri, S., Pfeifer, G., Terracina, G.: The disjunctive datalog system DLV. In: de Moor, O., Gottlob, G., Furche, T., Sellers, A. (eds.) Datalog 2010. LNCS, vol. 6702, pp. 282–301. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Baral, C.: Knowledge Representation, Reasoning, and Declarative Problem Solving. Cambridge University Press (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bonatti, P., Calimeri, F., Leone, N., Ricca, F.: Answer set programming. In: Dovier, A., Pontelli, E. (eds.) GULP. LNCS, vol. 6125, pp. 159–182. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Brewka, G.: Preferences, contexts and answer sets. In: Dahl, V., Niemelä, I. (eds.) ICLP 2007. LNCS, vol. 4670, pp. 22–22. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Brewka, G., Eiter, T., Truszczynski, M.: Answer set programming at a glance. Commun. ACM 54(12), 92–103 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brewka, G., Niemelä, I., Truszczynski, M.: Answer set optimization. In: Gottlob, G., Walsh, T. (eds.) Proc. 18th IJCAI, pp. 867–872. Morgan Kaufmann (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cabalar, P., Pearce, D., Valverde, A.: A revised concept of safety for general answer set programs. In: Erdem, E., Lin, F., Schaub, T. (eds.) LPNMR 2009. LNCS, vol. 5753, pp. 58–70. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Denecker, M., Marek, V., Truszczynski, M.: Stable operators, well-founded fixpoints and applications in nnonmonotonic reasoning. In: Minker, J. (ed.) Logic-based Artificial Intelligence, pp. 127–144. Kluwer Academic Pub. (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Eiter, T., Gottlob, G.: Complexity results for disjunctive logic programming and application to nonmonotonic logics. In: Miller, D. (ed.) Proceedings of the 1993 International Symposium on Logic Programming, pp. 266–278 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fages, F.: A new fixpoint sematics for general logic programs compared with the well-founded and stable model semantics. New Generation Computing 9, 425–443 (1991)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Fages, F.: Consistency of Clark’s completion and existence of stable models. Methods of Logic in Computer Science 1, 51–60 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fenstad, J.E.: Situations, Language and Logic. D. Reidel Publishing Company (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ferraris, P., Lifschitz, V.: On the minimality of stable models. In: Balduccini, M., Son, T.C. (eds.) Logic Programming, Knowledge Representation, and Nonmonotonic Reasoning. LNCS, vol. 6565, pp. 64–73. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Fitting, M.: A Kripke-Kleene semantics for logic programs. J. Logic Programming 2(4), 295–312 (1985)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Fitting, M.: The family of stable models. J. Logic Programming 17(2/3&4), 197–225 (1993)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Gelfond, M., Kahl, Y.: Knowledge Representation, Reasoning, and the Design of Intelligent Agents - The Answer-Set Programming Approach. Cambridge University Press (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gelfond, M., Lifschitz, V.: The stable model semantics for logic programming. In: Kowalski, R., Bowen, K. (eds.) Proc. of Int’l Logic Programming, pp. 1070–1080. MIT Press (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kleene, S.C.: On a notation for ordinal numbers. Symbolic Logic 3, 150–155 (1938)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Lifschitz, V.: Thirteen definitions of a stable model. In: Blass, A., Dershowitz, N., Reisig, W. (eds.) Fields of Logic and Computation. LNCS, vol. 6300, pp. 488–503. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Lonc, Z., Truszczynski, M.: Computing minimal models, stable models and answer sets. TPLP 6(4), 395–449 (2006)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Pearce, D.: Equilibrium logic. Annals of Mathematics and AI 47(1-2), 3–41 (2006)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Przymusinski, T.: Stable semantics for disjunctive programs. New Generation Comput. 9(3/4), 401–424 (1991)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Shepherdson, J.C.: A sound and complete semantics for a version of negation as failure. Theoretical Computer Science 65(3), 343–371 (1989)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Doherty, P., Szałas, A. (2015). Stability, Supportedness, Minimality and Kleene Answer Set Programs. In: Eiter, T., Strass, H., Truszczyński, M., Woltran, S. (eds) Advances in Knowledge Representation, Logic Programming, and Abstract Argumentation. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9060. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14726-0_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14726-0_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-14725-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-14726-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics