Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 9060))

  • 937 Accesses

Abstract

Decision making may involve multiple viewpoints which are comparing the given options according to different preference relations. The paper studies questions that arise when multiple viewpoints are merged into a single one. It shows how more specific preference statements over the merged viewpoint can override ceteris-paribus preferences resulting from aggregating the preferences of the individual viewpoints.

This paper is a fully revised version of an article of same title published in the AAAI Technical Report WS-07-10 and of which the author has retained the ownership.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aho, A.V., Garey, M.R., Ullman, J.D.: The Transitive Reduction of a Directed Graph. SIAM Journal on Computing 1(2), 131–137 (1972)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Brafman, R.I., Dimopoulos, Y.: Extended Semantics and Optimization Algortihms for CP-Networks. Computational Intelligence 20(2), 218–245 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Brewka, G.: Belief revision in a framework for default reasoning. In: Fuhrmann, A., Morreau, M. (eds.) The Logic of Theory Change. LNCS, vol. 465, pp. 206–222. Springer, Heidelberg (1991)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Gärdenfors, P.: Knowledge in Flux: Modeling the Dynamics of Epistemic States. College Publications (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Junker, U.: Relationships between Assumptions. Ph.D. thesis, University of Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Junker, U.: Preferences in an Open World. In: Rossi, F., Tsoukias, A. (eds.) ADT 2009. LNCS, vol. 5783, pp. 215–224. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Wicker, A.W., Doyle, J.: Comparing preferences expressed by CP-networks. In: AAAI Workshop on Advances in Preference Handling, pp. 128–133. AAAI (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Junker, U. (2015). Upside-Down Preference Reversal: How to Override Ceteris-Paribus Preferences?. In: Eiter, T., Strass, H., Truszczyński, M., Woltran, S. (eds) Advances in Knowledge Representation, Logic Programming, and Abstract Argumentation. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9060. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14726-0_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14726-0_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-14725-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-14726-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics