Skip to main content

Conventional Imaging Modalities for the Diagnosis of Lymphedema

  • Chapter
Lymphedema

Abstract

Typically, proper history and clinical examination can establish the diagnosis of lymphedema and differentiate the type (primary or secondary). Nevertheless, additional tests are sometimes necessary, particularly in the early stages of the disease and in edemas of combined etiology. The imaging studies primarily confirm the presence of impaired lymphatic flow and/or the typical pattern of abnormal fluid distribution within the tissues. Conventional imaging modalities like MRI, CT scan, and US provide valuable information regarding the anatomical distribution and etiology of lymphedema.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kinmonth JB, Taylor GW, Tracy GD, Marsh JD. Primary lymphœdema. Clinical and lymphangiographic studies of a series of 107 patients in which the lower limbs were affected. Br J Surg. 1957;45(189):1–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Browse NL, Stewart G. Lymphoedema: pathophysiology and classification. J Cardiovasc Surg. 1985;26(2):91–106.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rockson SG. Lymphedema. Am J Med. 2001; 110(4):288–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Szuba A, Rockson SG. Lymphedema: classification, diagnosis and therapy. Vasc Med (Lond, Engl). 1998;3(2):145–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Szuba A, Razavi M, Rockson SG. Diagnosis and treatment of concomitant venous obstruction in patients with secondary lymphedema. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2002;13(8):799–803.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zampell JC, Aschen S, Weitman ES, Yan A, Elhadad S, De Brot M, et al. Regulation of adipogenesis by lymphatic fluid stasis: part I. Adipogenesis, fibrosis, and inflammation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129(4):825–34.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Aschen S, Zampell JC, Elhadad S, Weitman E, De Brot M, Mehrara BJ. Regulation of adipogenesis by lymphatic fluid stasis: part II. Expression of adipose differentiation genes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129(4):838–47.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Duewell S, Hagspiel KD, Zuber J, von Schulthess GK, Bollinger A, Fuchs WA. Swollen lower extremity: role of MR imaging. Radiology. 1992;184(1):227–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Haaverstad R, Nilsen G, Myhre HO, Saether OD, Rinck PA. The use of MRI in the investigation of leg oedema. Eur J Vasc Surg. 1992;6(2):124–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Haaverstad R, Nilsen G, Rinck PA, Myhre HO. The use of MRI in the diagnosis of chronic lymphedema of the lower extremity. Int Angiol. 1994;13(2):115–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Case TC, Witte CL, Witte MH, Unger EC, Williams WH. Magnetic resonance imaging in human lymphedema: comparison with lymphangioscintigraphy. Magn Reson Imaging. 1992;10(4):549–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Guimaraes R, Clement O, Bittoun J, Carnot F, Frija G. MR lymphography with superparamagnetic iron nanoparticles in rats: pathologic basis for contrast enhancement. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994;162(1):201–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Saksena MA, Saokar A, Harisinghani MG. Lymphotropic nanoparticle enhanced MR imaging (LNMRI) technique for lymph node imaging. Eur J Radiol. 2006;58(3):367–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. McDermott S, Thayer SP, Fernandez-Del Castillo C, Mino-Kenudson M, Weissleder R, Harisinghani MG. Accurate prediction of nodal status in preoperative patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma using next-gen nanoparticle. Transl Oncol. 2013;6(6):670–5.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rane S, Donahue PM, Towse T, Ridner S, Chappell M, Jordi J, et al. Clinical feasibility of noninvasive visualization of lymphatic flow with principles of spin labeling MR imaging: implications for lymphedema assessment. Radiology. 2013;269(3):893–902.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lohrmann C, Foeldi E, Bartholoma JP, Langer M. Interstitial MR lymphangiography—a diagnostic imaging method for the evaluation of patients with clinically advanced stages of lymphedema. Acta Trop. 2007;104(1):8–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu NF, Lu Q, Jiang ZH, Wang CG, Zhou JG. Anatomic and functional evaluation of the lymphatics and lymph nodes in diagnosis of lymphatic circulation disorders with contrast magnetic resonance lymphangiography. J Vasc Surg. 2009;49(4):980–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu N, Zhang Y (2014) Magnetic Resonance Lymphangiography for the Study of Lymphatic System in Lymphedema. J Reconstr Microsurg (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Weiss M, Burgard C, Baumeister R, Strobl F, Rominger A, Bartenstein P, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging versus lymphoscintigraphy for the assessment of focal lymphatic transport disorders of the lower limb: first experiences. Nuklearmedizin. 2014;53(5):190–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Turkbey B, Kobayashi H, Hoyt Jr RF, Choyke PL, Nakajima T, Griffiths GL, et al. Magnetic resonance lymphography of the thoracic duct after interstitial injection of gadofosveset trisodium: a pilot dosing study in a porcine model. Lymphat Res Biol. 2014;12(1):32–6.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sena LM, Fishman SJ, Jenkins KJ, Xu H, Brechbiel MW, Regino CA, et al. Magnetic resonance lymphangiography with a nano-sized gadolinium-labeled dendrimer in small and large animal models. Nanomedicine (Lond). 2010;5(8):1183–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hadjis NS, Carr DH, Banks L, Pflug JJ. The role of CT in the diagnosis of primary lymphedema of the lower limb. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1985;144(2):361–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Marotel M, Cluzan R, Pascot M, Ghabboun S, Alliot F, Lasry JL. Computerized tomography of 150 cases of lymphedema of the leg. J Radiol. 1998;79(11):1373–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Collins CD, Mortimer PS, D’Ettorre H, A’Hern RP, Moskovic EC. Computed tomography in the assessment of response to limb compression in unilateral lymphoedema. Clin Radiol. 1995;50(8):541–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gniadecka M. Localization of dermal edema in lipodermatosclerosis, lymphedema, and cardiac insufficiency. High-frequency ultrasound examination of intradermal echogenicity. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1996;35(1):37–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Balzarini A, Milella M, Civelli E, Sigari C, De Conno F. Ultrasonography of arm edema after axillary dissection for breast cancer: a preliminary study. Lymphology. 2001;34(4):152–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lee B, Andrade M, Bergan J, Boccardo F, Campisi C, Damstra R, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of primary lymphedema. Consensus document of the International Union of Phlebology (IUP)-2009. Int Angiol. 2010;29(5):454–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Statement of Financial Interest

No financial support or benefits were given to the authors from any source that is related to the scientific work reported in the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmad I. Alomari M.D., M.Sc., F.S.I.R. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Goyal, P., Chaudry, G., Alomari, A.I. (2015). Conventional Imaging Modalities for the Diagnosis of Lymphedema. In: Greene, A., Slavin, S., Brorson, H. (eds) Lymphedema. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14493-1_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14493-1_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-14492-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-14493-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics