Advertisement

Design and Usability of a Smart Home Sensor Data User Interface for a Clinical and Research Audience

  • Mary SheahenEmail author
  • Marjorie Skubic
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8456)

Abstract

Motion, bed, and gait analysis sensors are installed in the homes of seniors and monitored continuously for the purpose of detecting early signs of health change and functional decline. Automated health alerts are sent to clinical staff as part of a clinical decision support system. Embedded in each health alert is a link to a web interface for interactively displaying the sensor data patterns. The health alerts facilitate early interventions; however, the design and usability of the web interface greatly affect the effectiveness of the clinical decision support system. Here, we present the analysis and redesign of the interactive web-based interface for displaying the in-home sensor data. The current design is analyzed for inconsistencies and potential user frustrations, and a new design is proposed to correct these problems.

Keywords

User-centered interface Iterative design Web interface design Usability 

References

  1. 1.
    Skubic, M., Alexander, G., Popescu, M., Rantz, M., Keller, J.: A smart home application to eldercare: current status and lessons learned. Technol. Health Care 17(3), 183–201 (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rantz, M.J., Skubic, M., Koopman, R.J., Alexander, G., Phillips, L., Musterman, K.I., Back, J.R., Aud, M.A., Galambos, C., Guevara, R.D., Miller, S.J.: Automated technology to speed recognition of signs of illness in older adults. J. Gerontological Nurs. 38(4), 18–23 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rantz, M., Scott, S.D., Miller, S.J., Skubic, M., Phillips, L., Alexander, G., Koopman, R.J., Musterman, K., Back, J.: Evaluation of health alerts from an early illness warning system in independent living. Comput. Inform. Nurs. 31(6), 274–280 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Heise, D., Rosales, L., Sheahen, M., Su, B.Y., Skubic, M.: Non-invasive measurement of heartbeat with a hydraulic bed sensor: progress, challenges, and opportunities. In: Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Instrumentation & Measurement Technical Conference, Minneapolis, MN, pp. 4356–4360 (2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rosales, L., Skubic, M., Heise, D., Devaney, M.J., Schaumburg, M.: Heartbeat detection from a hydraulic bed sensor using a clustering approach. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, San Diego, CA, pp. 2383–2387 (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Su, B.Y., Ho, K.C., Skubic, M., Rosales, L.: Pulse rate estimation using hydraulic bed sensor. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, San Diego, CA, pp. 2587–2590 (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stone, E., Skubic, M.: Unobtrusive, continuous, In-HomeGait measurement using the microsoft kinect. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 60(10), 2925–2932 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kaye, J., Maxwell, S., Mattek, N., Hayes, T., Dodge, H., Pavel, M., Jimison, H., Wild, K., Boise, L., Zitzelberger, T.: Intelligent systems for assessing aging changes: home-based, unobtrusive and continuous assessment of aging. J Geron. B Psych. Sci. 66B, 180–190 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hussain, S., Enrdogen, S., Park, J.: Monitoring user activities in smart home environments. Inf. Syst. Front. 11, 539–549 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cuddihy, P., Hinman, R.T., Avestruz, A., Lupton, E.C., Livshin, G., et al.: Successful aging. Pervasive Comput. 3(2), 48–50 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wang, S., Skubic, M., Zhu, Y.: Activity density map visualization and dis-similarity comparison for eldercare monitoring. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inf. 16(4), 607–614 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Galambos, C., Skubic, M., Wang, S., Rantz, M.: Management of dementia and depression utilizing in-home passive sensor data. Gerontechnology 11(3), 457–468 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Alexander, G.L., Wakefield, B.J., Rantz, M., Skubic, M., Aud, M., Erdelez, S., Ghenaimi, S.A.: Passive sensor technology interface to assess elder activity in independent living. J. Nurs. Res. 60(5), 318–325 (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Le, T., Reeder, B., Chung, J., Thompson, H., Demiris, G.: Design of smart home sensor visualizations for older adults. Technol Health Care, July 2014Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Reeder, B., Chung, J., Le, T., Thompson, H., Demiris, G.: Assessing older adults’ perceptions of sensor data and designing visual displays for ambient environments: an exploratory study. Meth. Inf Med. 53(3), 152–159 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Smelcer, J.B., Miller-Jacobs, H., Kantrovich, L.: Usability of electronic medical records. J. Usability Stud. 4(2), 70–84 (2009)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services. The Research-Based Web Design & Usability Guidelines, Enlarged/Expanded edition. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of MissouriColumbiaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringUniversity of MissouriColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations