Advertisement

Designing a Multi-sided Health and Wellbeing Platform: Results of a First Design Cycle

  • W. J. W. Keijzer-BroersEmail author
  • G. A. de Reuver
  • N. A. Guldemond
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8456)

Abstract

While worldwide several health and wellbeing products and services are being developed to support people to live comfortable and independently in their home environment, widespread adoption of these smart living solutions is still not envisioned. A hindering factor is that users are not aware of possible solutions or where to find them, which could be solved through promoting solutions on shared platforms. Designing such platforms is challenging as multiple stakeholders need to be satisfied and start-up problems need to be overcome. Most theory on platforms is explored in ex-post studies and there is a lack of knowledge on how platforms should be designed and implemented. In this paper, we elicit functional requirements for the design of a multi-sided health and wellbeing platform based on interviews with both end-users and stakeholders. These requirements provide the basis for future design cycles in which, the development and actual implementation of a platform is foreseen.

Keywords

Design science Service platform Health and wellbeing Smart living Matchmaking Stakeholders Social infrastructure 

References

  1. 1.
    Nikayin, F., De Reuver, M.: Opening up the smart home: a classification of smart living service platforms. Int. J. E-services Mob. Appl. 5(2), 37–53 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Peine, A.: Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 76(3), 396–409 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wichert, R., Furfari, F., Kung, A., Tazari, M.R.: How to overcome the market entrance barrier and achieve the market breakthrough in AAL. In: Wichert, R., Eberhardt, B. (eds.) Ambient Assisted Living. ATSC, vol. 2, pp. 349–358. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Solaimani, S., Bouwman, H., Baken, N.: The smart home landscape: a qualitative meta-analysis. In: Abdulrazak, B., Giroux, S., Bouchard, B., Pigot, H., Mokhtari, M. (eds.) ICOST 2011. LNCS, vol. 6719, pp. 192–199. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Grönroos, C.: Service logic revisited: who creates value? And who co-creates? Eur. Bus. Rev. 20(4), 298–314 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Weiser, M.: The computer for the 21st century. Palo Alto, Research Center: Xerox, CA, USA (1991)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pung, H.K., et al.: Context-aware middleware for pervasive elderly homecare. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 27(4), 510–524 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Solaimani, S., Keijzer-Broers, W., Bouwman, H.: What we do - and don’t - know about the Smart Home - An analysis of the Smart Home literature (IBE-13-0120) Indoor and Built Environment (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fitrianie, S., Huldtgren, A., Alers, H., Guldemond, N.A.: A SmartTV platform for wellbeing, care and social support for elderly at home. In: Biswas, J., Kobayashi, H., Wong, L., Abdulrazak, B., Mokhtari, M. (eds.) ICOST 2013. LNCS, vol. 7910, pp. 94–101. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    UN_Population_Division, World Population Ageing 2013, in ST/ESA/SER.A/348. 2013, United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population DivisionGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Eurostat, Active ageing and solidarity between generations. A statistical portrait of the European Union, E. Commission, Editor (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    EC, CoR, and AGE. How to promote active ageing in Europe: EU support to local and regional actors (2011). http://europa.eu/ey2012/BlobServlet?docId=7005&langId=en (cited June 2013)
  13. 13.
    Aldrich, F.K.: Smart homes: past, present, and future. In: Harper, R. (ed.) Inside the Smart Home, pp. 17–39. Springer, London (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Barlow, J., Venables, T.: Smart home, dumb suppliers? The future of smart homes markets. In: Harper, R. (ed.) Inside the Smart Home, pp. 247–262. Springer, London (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jacobzone, S., Cambois, E, Robine, J.M.: The health of older persons in OECD countries: is it improving fast enough to compensate for population ageing?. In: Labour Market and Social Policy Occasional Papers, pp. 149–190. OECD, Paris (1999)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Da Roit, B.: Long-term care reforms in the Netherlands. In: Ranci, C., Pavolini, E. (eds.) Reforms in Long-Term Care Policies in Europe, pp. 97–115. Springer, New York (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hagiu, A.: Proprietary vs. Open two-sided platforms and social efficiency (2006)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Evans, D., Schmalensee, R.: Failure to launch: critical mass in platform businesses. Soc. Sci. Res. Netw. (2010)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gawer, A.: Platform dynamics and strategies: from products to services. In: Gawer, A. (ed.) Platforms, Markets and Innovation, pp. 45–76. Edward Elgar, Northampton (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Evans, D.: How catalysts ignite: the economics of platform-based start-ups. In: Gawer, A. (ed.) Platforms Markets and Innovation. Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham (2009)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Boudreau, K.J., Hagiu, A.: Platform rules: multi-sided platforms as regulators. In: Gawer, A. (ed.) Platforms, Markets and Innovation, pp. 163–191. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Cheltenham (2009)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tilson, D., Lyytinen, K., Sørensen, C.: Research commentary-digital infrastructures: the missing is research agenda. Inf. Syst. Res. 21(4), 748–759 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    West, J.: How open is open enough? Res. Policy 32(7), 1259–1285 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nikayin, F.: Common platform dilemmas: collective action and the internet of things. In: Technology, Policy and Management - Engineering, Systems and Services 2014. Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands (2014)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Smith, A., Fischbacher, M., Wilson, F.: New service development: from panoramas to precision. Eur. Manag. J. 25(5), 370–383 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Räisänen, V.: Service modeling: principles and applications. Wiley, Chichester (2008)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hevner, A., et al.: Design science in information systems research. MIS Q. 28(1), 75–105 (2004)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Verschuren, P., Hartog, R.: Evaluation in design-oriented research. Qual. Quant. 39(6), 733–762 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kuechler, W., Vaishnavi, V.: On theory development in design science research: anatomy of a research project. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 17(5), 1–23 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Van Aken, J.E.: Management research based on the paradigm of the design sciences: the quest for field-tested and grounded technological rules. J. Manage. Stud. 41(2), 219–246 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Livari, J.: A paradigmatic analysis of information systems as a design science. Scand. J. Inf. Syst. 19(2), 39–64 (2007)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Simon, H.: The Sciences of Artificial, 3rd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge (1996)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sein, M., et al.: Action design research. MIS Q. 35(1), 37–56 (2011)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Keijzer-Broers, W.J.W., de Reuver, M., Guldemond, N.A.: Designing a matchmaking platform for smart living services. In: Biswas, J., Kobayashi, H., Wong, L., Abdulrazak, B., Mokhtari, M. (eds.) ICOST 2013. LNCS, vol. 7910, pp. 224–229. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. J. W. Keijzer-Broers
    • 1
    Email author
  • G. A. de Reuver
    • 1
  • N. A. Guldemond
    • 2
  1. 1.Delft University of TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands
  2. 2.UMC UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations