Skip to main content

Objectivity, Intellectual Virtue, and Community

  • Chapter
Objectivity in Science

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science ((BSPS,volume 310))

Abstract

In this paper, I argue that the objectivity of persons is best understood in terms of intellectual virtue, the telos of which is an enduring commitment to salient and accurate information about reality. On this view, an objective reasoner is one we can trust to manage her perspectives, beliefs, emotions, biases, and responses to evidence in an intellectually virtuous manner. We can be confident that she will exercise intellectual carefulness, openmindedness, fairmindedness, curiosity, and other intellectual virtues in her reasoning. I argue further that the cultivation and exercise of such virtues is a social phenomenon and thus challenge highly individualistic notions of intellectual character, epistemic autonomy, and personal objectivity. An advantage of this account of objectivity is that it better enables us to address bias in scientific research, science policy, and public debates about science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baehr, Jason. 2010. Epistemic malevolence. In Virtue and vice, moral and epistemic, ed. Heather Battaly, 189–213. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baehr, Jason. 2011. The inquiring mind: On intellectual virtues and virtue epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Battaly, Heather. 2010. Introduction: Virtue and vice. In Virtue and vice, moral and epistemic, ed. Heather Battaly, 1–20. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Mark. 2009. Science in democracy: Expertise, institutions, and representation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Coplan, Amy. 2010. Feeling without thinking: Lessons from the ancients on emotion and virtue acquisition. In Virtue and vice, moral and epistemic, ed. Heather Battaly, 133–151. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crisp, Roger. 2010. Virtue ethics and virtue epistemology. In Virtue and vice, moral and epistemic, ed. Heather Battaly, 21–38. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daston, Lorraine. 1992. Objectivity and the escape from perspective. Social Studies of Science 22: 597–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daston, Lorraine, and Peter Galison. 2007. Objectivity. New York: Zone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daukas, Nancy. 2006. Epistemic trust and social location. Episteme: A Journal of Social Epistemology 3: 109–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, Heather. 2009. Science, policy, and the value-free ideal. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, Cordelia. 2006. A mind of its own: How the brain distorts and deceives. New York/London: W. W. Norton and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, Jorge L.A. 2003. Practical reason and its virtues. In Intellectual virtue: Perspectives from ethics and epistemology, ed. Michael DePaul and Linda Zagzebski, 81–107. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hookway, Christopher. 2003. How to be a virtue epistemologist. In Intellectual virtue: Perspectives from ethics and epistemology, ed. Michael DePaul and Linda Zagzebski, 183–202. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, Don. 2009. Better red than dead—Putting an end to the social irrelevance of postwar philosophy of science. Science and Education 18: 199–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howes, Moira. 2012. Managing salience: The importance of intellectual virtue in analyses of biased scientific reasoning. Hypatia 27: 736–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koenig, Melissa, and Paul Harris. 2008. The basis of epistemic trust: reliable testimony or reliable sources? Episteme: A Journal of Social Epistemology 4: 264–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Carole, and Christian Schunn. 2011. Social biases and solutions for procedural objectivity. Hypatia 26: 352–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinnon, Christine. 2003. Knowing cognitive selves. In Intellectual virtue: Perspectives from ethics and epistemology, eds. Michael DePaul and Linda Zagzebski, 227–253. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser, Jason S., Steven B. Most, and Robert F. Simons. 2010. Increasing negative emotions by reappraisal enhances subsequent cognitive control: A combined behavioral and electrophysiological study. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience 10: 195–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, Claudia, and Carol Dweck. 1998. Praise for intelligence can undermine children’s motivation and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 75: 33–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oreskes, Naomi, and Erik M. Conway. 2010. Merchants of doubt: How a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. New York: Bloomsbury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riggs, Wayne. 2010. Open-mindedness. In Virtue and vice, moral and epistemic, ed. Heather Battaly, 173–188. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Robert C., and W. Jay Wood. 2007. Intellectual virtue: An essay in regulative epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rudner, Richard. 1953. The scientist qua scientist makes value judgments. Philosophy of Science 20(1): 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheman, Naomi. 2001. Epistemology resuscitated: Objectivity and trustworthiness. In Nancy Tuana and Sandra Morgen, eds. Engendering rationalities, 41–42. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapin, Steven, and Simon Schaffer. 1989. Leviathan and the air pump. Hobbes, boyle and the experimental life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, Nancy, and Heath White. 2003. Intellectual virtue: Emotions, luck, and the ancients. In Intellectual virtue: Perspectives from ethics and epistemology, ed. Michael DePaul and Linda Zagzebski, 34–53. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Tara. 2004. Social objectivity and the objectivity of values. In Science, values, and objectivity, ed. Peter Machamer and Gereon Wolters, 143–171. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, David. 2003. Virtue ethics: Radical or routine? In Intellectual virtue: Perspectives from ethics and epistemology, ed. Michael DePaul and Linda Zagzebski, 57–80. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Sarah. 2010. Virtues, social roles, and contextualism. In Virtue and vice, moral and epistemic, ed. Heather Battaly, 95–113. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zagzebski, Linda. 1996. Virtues of the mind: An inquiry into the nature virtue and the ethical foundations of knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zagzebski, Linda. 2007. Ethical and epistemic egoism and the ideal of autonomy. Episteme: A Journal of Social Epistemology 4: 253–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Moira Howes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Howes, M. (2015). Objectivity, Intellectual Virtue, and Community. In: Padovani, F., Richardson, A., Tsou, J. (eds) Objectivity in Science. Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, vol 310. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14349-1_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics