Abstract
In this paper, I argue that the objectivity of persons is best understood in terms of intellectual virtue, the telos of which is an enduring commitment to salient and accurate information about reality. On this view, an objective reasoner is one we can trust to manage her perspectives, beliefs, emotions, biases, and responses to evidence in an intellectually virtuous manner. We can be confident that she will exercise intellectual carefulness, openmindedness, fairmindedness, curiosity, and other intellectual virtues in her reasoning. I argue further that the cultivation and exercise of such virtues is a social phenomenon and thus challenge highly individualistic notions of intellectual character, epistemic autonomy, and personal objectivity. An advantage of this account of objectivity is that it better enables us to address bias in scientific research, science policy, and public debates about science.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Baehr, Jason. 2010. Epistemic malevolence. In Virtue and vice, moral and epistemic, ed. Heather Battaly, 189–213. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
Baehr, Jason. 2011. The inquiring mind: On intellectual virtues and virtue epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Battaly, Heather. 2010. Introduction: Virtue and vice. In Virtue and vice, moral and epistemic, ed. Heather Battaly, 1–20. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
Brown, Mark. 2009. Science in democracy: Expertise, institutions, and representation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Coplan, Amy. 2010. Feeling without thinking: Lessons from the ancients on emotion and virtue acquisition. In Virtue and vice, moral and epistemic, ed. Heather Battaly, 133–151. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
Crisp, Roger. 2010. Virtue ethics and virtue epistemology. In Virtue and vice, moral and epistemic, ed. Heather Battaly, 21–38. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
Daston, Lorraine. 1992. Objectivity and the escape from perspective. Social Studies of Science 22: 597–618.
Daston, Lorraine, and Peter Galison. 2007. Objectivity. New York: Zone Books.
Daukas, Nancy. 2006. Epistemic trust and social location. Episteme: A Journal of Social Epistemology 3: 109–124.
Douglas, Heather. 2009. Science, policy, and the value-free ideal. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Fine, Cordelia. 2006. A mind of its own: How the brain distorts and deceives. New York/London: W. W. Norton and Company.
Garcia, Jorge L.A. 2003. Practical reason and its virtues. In Intellectual virtue: Perspectives from ethics and epistemology, ed. Michael DePaul and Linda Zagzebski, 81–107. Oxford: Clarendon.
Hookway, Christopher. 2003. How to be a virtue epistemologist. In Intellectual virtue: Perspectives from ethics and epistemology, ed. Michael DePaul and Linda Zagzebski, 183–202. Oxford: Clarendon.
Howard, Don. 2009. Better red than dead—Putting an end to the social irrelevance of postwar philosophy of science. Science and Education 18: 199–220.
Howes, Moira. 2012. Managing salience: The importance of intellectual virtue in analyses of biased scientific reasoning. Hypatia 27: 736–754.
Koenig, Melissa, and Paul Harris. 2008. The basis of epistemic trust: reliable testimony or reliable sources? Episteme: A Journal of Social Epistemology 4: 264–284.
Lee, Carole, and Christian Schunn. 2011. Social biases and solutions for procedural objectivity. Hypatia 26: 352–373.
McKinnon, Christine. 2003. Knowing cognitive selves. In Intellectual virtue: Perspectives from ethics and epistemology, eds. Michael DePaul and Linda Zagzebski, 227–253. Oxford: Clarendon.
Moser, Jason S., Steven B. Most, and Robert F. Simons. 2010. Increasing negative emotions by reappraisal enhances subsequent cognitive control: A combined behavioral and electrophysiological study. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience 10: 195–207.
Mueller, Claudia, and Carol Dweck. 1998. Praise for intelligence can undermine children’s motivation and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 75: 33–52.
Oreskes, Naomi, and Erik M. Conway. 2010. Merchants of doubt: How a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. New York: Bloomsbury Press.
Riggs, Wayne. 2010. Open-mindedness. In Virtue and vice, moral and epistemic, ed. Heather Battaly, 173–188. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
Roberts, Robert C., and W. Jay Wood. 2007. Intellectual virtue: An essay in regulative epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rudner, Richard. 1953. The scientist qua scientist makes value judgments. Philosophy of Science 20(1): 1–6.
Scheman, Naomi. 2001. Epistemology resuscitated: Objectivity and trustworthiness. In Nancy Tuana and Sandra Morgen, eds. Engendering rationalities, 41–42. Albany: SUNY Press.
Shapin, Steven, and Simon Schaffer. 1989. Leviathan and the air pump. Hobbes, boyle and the experimental life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Sherman, Nancy, and Heath White. 2003. Intellectual virtue: Emotions, luck, and the ancients. In Intellectual virtue: Perspectives from ethics and epistemology, ed. Michael DePaul and Linda Zagzebski, 34–53. Oxford: Clarendon.
Smith, Tara. 2004. Social objectivity and the objectivity of values. In Science, values, and objectivity, ed. Peter Machamer and Gereon Wolters, 143–171. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Solomon, David. 2003. Virtue ethics: Radical or routine? In Intellectual virtue: Perspectives from ethics and epistemology, ed. Michael DePaul and Linda Zagzebski, 57–80. Oxford: Clarendon.
Wright, Sarah. 2010. Virtues, social roles, and contextualism. In Virtue and vice, moral and epistemic, ed. Heather Battaly, 95–113. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
Zagzebski, Linda. 1996. Virtues of the mind: An inquiry into the nature virtue and the ethical foundations of knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zagzebski, Linda. 2007. Ethical and epistemic egoism and the ideal of autonomy. Episteme: A Journal of Social Epistemology 4: 253–254.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Howes, M. (2015). Objectivity, Intellectual Virtue, and Community. In: Padovani, F., Richardson, A., Tsou, J. (eds) Objectivity in Science. Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, vol 310. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14349-1_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14349-1_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-14348-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-14349-1
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)