Skip to main content

Perceived Usability, Attractiveness and Intuitiveness of Responsive Mobile Tourism Websites: A User Experience Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2015

Abstract

Users increasingly access the internet through their smartphones creating the need for a different web design approach in order to meet the requirements of new user behaviour. Responsive Web design (RWD) is an approach to develop websites dynamically and adjust their layout and content to the screen size of a user’s device. This study investigates the impact of RWD on perceived usability, perceived attractiveness and intuitiveness through a user experience experiment of two touristic information websites (desktop and mobile versions) with varying levels of compliance to those guidelines. Results indicate that there are significant differences in perceived usability and user experience between desktop computers and smartphones in general. Additionally, mobile information services following a stricter approach to RWD are perceived as easier and more intuitive to use, yet they fail to create emotion and consequently are less recommended by users.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bangor, A., Kortum, P., & Miller, J. (2009). Determining what individual SUS scores mean: Adding an adjective rating scale. Journal of Usability Studies, 4(3), 114–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohyun, K. (2013). Responsive web design, discoverability, and mobile challenge. Library Technology Reports, 49, 29–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brau, H., & Sarodnick, F. (2006). Methoden der usability evaluation: Wissenschaft. Grundlagen und praktische Anwendung (Praxis der Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie 1st ed.). Bern: Hans Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooke, J. (1996). SUS: A “quick and dirty” usability scale. In P. W. Jordan, B. Thomas, B. A. Weerdmeester, & I. L. McClelland (Eds.), Usability evaluation in industry (pp. 189–194). London: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Champeon, S. (2013). Progressive enhancement and the future of web design. Retrieved from http://hesketh.com/publications/progressive_enhancement_and_the_future_of_web_design.html

  • Chawda, B., Craft, B., Cairns, P., Heesch, D., & Rüger, S. (2005). Do “attractive things work better”? An exploration of search tool visualisations. In O. W. Bertelsen (Ed.), Proceedings of 19th British HCI group annual conference: The bigger picture (pp. 46–51). Edinburgh: British HCI group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Church, K., & Oliver, N. (2011). Understanding mobile web and mobile search use in today’s dynamic mobile landscape. In M. Bylund, O. Juhlin, & Y. Fernaeus (Eds.), The 13th international conference (p. 67). New York, NY: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diefenbach, S., & Ullrich, D. (2011). Erlebnis intuitive Interaktion – ein phänomenologischer Ansatz. i-com, 10(3), 63–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, R. (2012). Being responsive. OCLC Systems and Services, 28(3), 119–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, B. S. (2011). Responsive web design: Enriching the user experience—Connectivity and the user experience (pp. 13–19). Retrieved June 18, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gretzel, U., Fesenmaier, D., & O’Leary, J. T. (2008). The transformation of consumer behaviour. In D. Buhalis & C. Costa (Eds.), Tourism business frontiers: Consumers, products and industry (pp. 1–18). Burlington, MA: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grün, C., Werthner, H., Pröll, B., Retschitzegger, W., & Schwinger, W. (2008) Assisting tourists on the move—An evaluation of mobile tourist guides. In 7th international conference on mobile business (ICMB) (pp. 171–180). Barcelona: IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, T. A., Chaparro, B. S., & Halcomb, C. G. (2008). Evaluating websites for older adults: adherence to ‘senior-friendly’ guidelines and end-user performance. Behaviour and Information Technology, 27(3), 191–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassenzahl, M., Burmester, M., & Koller, F. (2003). AttrakDiff: Ein Fragebogen zur Messung wahrgenommener hedonischer und pragmatischer Qualität. In J. Ziegler & G. Szwillus (Eds.), Proceedings of Mensch and computer (pp. 187–196). Stuttgart: Teubner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassenzahl, M., Kort, J., Law, E., Roto, V., & Vermeeren, A. (2009). Understanding, scoping and defining user experience: A survey approach. In R. B. Arthur & D. R. Olsen (Eds.), Proceedings of the CHI 09 conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 719–728). New York, NY: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurtienne, J., Mohs, C., Meyer, H. A., Kindsmüller, M. C., & Habakuk Israel, J. (2006). Intuitive use of user interfaces—Definition und Herausforderungen. i-com, 5(3), 38–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, A., Ribarsky, W., & Wang, X. (2012). Towards the establishment of a framework for intuitive multi-touch interaction design. In S. Levialdi, G. Tortora, & M. Tucci (Eds.), AVI ‘12 proceedings of the international working conference on advanced visual interfaces (pp. 66–73). New York, NY: ACM.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J. (2012). Predicting net promoter scores from system usability scale scores: Measuring usability. Retrieved July 21, 2014, from http://www.measuringusability.com/blog/nps-sus.php

  • Marcotte, E. (2011). Responsive web design. New York, NY: Book Apart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, J. (2012). Usability 101: Introduction to usability. Retrieved December 16, 2013, from http://www.nngroup.com/articles/usability-101-introduction-to-usability/

  • Nielsen, J., & Budiu, R. (2013). Mobile usability. Berkeley, CA: New Riders.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, J. M., & Tran, T. Q. (2010). Attractive phones don’t have to work better: Independent effects of attractiveness, effectiveness, and efficiency on perceived usability. In E. Mynatt, D. Schoner, G. Fitzpatrick, S. Hudson, K. Edwards, & T. Rodden (Eds.), Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 353–362). Atlanta, GA: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raptis, D., Tselios, N., Kjeldskov, J., & Skov, M. B. (2013). Does size matter? In M. Rohs, A. Schmidt, D. Ashbrook, & E. Rukzio (Eds.), Proceedings of the 15th international conference on human-computer-interaction with mobile devices and services (p. 127). New York, NY: ACM.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rasinger, J., Fuchs, M., & Höpken, W. (2007). Information search with mobile tourist guides: A survey of usage intention. Information Technology and Tourism, 9(3), 177–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichheld, F. F. (2003). The one number you need to grow. Harvard Business Review, 81(12), 46–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricci, F. (2010). Mobile recommender systems. Information Technology and Tourism, 12(3), 205–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauro, J., & Lewis, J. R. (2010). Average task times in usability tests. In E. Mynatt, D. Schoner, G. Fitzpatrick, S. Hudson, K. Edwards, & T. Rodden (Eds.), The 28th international conference (p. 2347). Atlanta, GA: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauro, J., & Lewis, J. R. (2012). Quantifying the user experience: Practical statistics for user research. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanimura, M., & Ueno, T. (2013). Smartphone user interface. FUJITSU Scientific and Technical, 49(2), 227–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullrich, D., & Diefenbach, S. (2010). INTUI: Exploring the facets of intuitive interaction. In J. Ziegler (Ed.), Mensch and computer 2010: 10. fachübergreifende Konferenz für interaktive und kooperative Medien; interaktive Kulturen (p. 251). München: Oldenbourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, D., & Diefenbach, S. (2010). From magical experience to effortlessness: An exploration of the components of intuitive interaction. Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries (pp. 801–804). New York, NY: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, D., & Fesenmaier, D. R. (2013). Transforming the travel experience: The use of smartphones for travel. In L. Cantoni & Z. Xiang (Eds.), Information and communication technologies in tourism 2013 (pp. 58–69). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wessels, A., Purvis, M., & Rahman, S. (2011). Usability of web interfaces on mobile devices. In ITNG (Ed.), Eighth international conference on information technology: New generations (pp. 1066–1067). Las Vegas, NV: IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aleksander Groth .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Groth, A., Haslwanter, D. (2015). Perceived Usability, Attractiveness and Intuitiveness of Responsive Mobile Tourism Websites: A User Experience Study. In: Tussyadiah, I., Inversini, A. (eds) Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2015. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14343-9_43

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics