Abstract
The importance and difficulty of comprehending texts is unquestionable. Reading comprehension is a very important predictor for successful language learning because it involves mental processes of learning. Cognitive load theory is concerned with relationships between working and long-term memory and the effects of those relationships on learning and problem solving. This theory has been used to generate many instructional procedures one of which is the redundancy effect (RE). The RE happens when the same information is presented to learners simultaneously through different modes of instruction. This paper explores the extent to which the RE impinges on a group of young learners’ reading comprehension skills. The students were divided into two groups. One was exposed to a single mode of instruction: reading alone. The other was presented with a dual format: reading plus listening. Results revealed that students presented with the single mode of instruction outperformed the other group in a reading comprehension task. Some pedagogical implications for the teaching of reading comprehension skills will be discussed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
An activity is considered difficult when there is a need to attend to the relationships between the elements that constitute a piece of complex information. These elements interact with each other and, as a result of the high element interactivity, the cognitive load induced goes beyond the resources of working memory.
References
Baker, D. (2010). PET result. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Barnett, M. A. (1988). Reading through context: How real and perceived strategy use affects L2 comprehension. Modern Language Journal, 72, 150–160.
Brantmeier, C. (2002). Second language reading strategy research at the secondary and university levels: Variations, disparities and generalizability. The Reading Matrix, 2(3), 1–14.
Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8, 293–332.
Cooper, G. (1998). Research into cognitive load theory and instructional design at UNSW. School of Education Studies. Sydney, Australia: The University of New South Wales. Retrieved from http://dwb4.unl.edu/Diss/Cooper/UNSW.htm
Craig, S. D., Gholson, B., & Driscoll, D. M. (2002). Animated pedagogical agents in multimedia educational environments: Effects of agent properties, picture features, and redundancy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 428–434.
Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2000). Incorporating learner experience into the design of multimedia instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 126–136.
Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2004). When redundant on-screen text in multimedia technical instruction can interfere with learning. Human Factors, 46, 567–581.
Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163–182.
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Lightbown, P. M., Spada, N., & White, L. (1993). The role of instruction in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15(2) (thematic issue).
Luchini, P., & Ferreiro, G. (in press). La interface entre la TeorĂa de la Carga Cognitiva y las habilidades de lectura comprensiva en inglĂ©s: Un estudio experimental mixto. Madrid, Spain: DILL, Publicaciones de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
Machado, C., & Luchini, P. (2013). Effects generated by cognitive load theory: Does language proficiency reduce the redundancy effect? V Jornadas de Actualización de la Enseñanza de Inglés, Facultad de Humanidades, Universidad Nacional de San Juan.
Mayer, R. E., Heiser, J., & Lonn, S. (2001). Cognitive constraints on multimedia learning: When presenting more material results in less understanding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 187–198.
McNamara, D. S., & Magliano, J. (2009). Towards a comprehensive model of comprehension. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 297–384). New York, NY: Academic Press.
Mehrpour, S., & Riazi, A. (2004). The impact of text length on EFL students’ reading comprehension. ASIAN EFL Journal, 3(6), 13–26.
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.
Moss, J., Schunn, Ch., Schneider, W., McNamara, D., & VanLehn, K. (2011). The neural correlates of strategic reading comprehension: Cognitive control and discourse comprehension. NeuroImage, 58, 675–686.
Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4, 295–312.
Sweller, J. (1999). Instructional design in technical areas. Camberwell, England: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Sweller, J. (2003). Evolution of human cognitive architecture. In B. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 215–266). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Sweller, J. (2004). Instructional design consequences of an analogy between evolution by natural selection and human cognitive architecture. Instruction al Science, 32, 9–31.
Sweller, J. (2005). The redundancy principle. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 159–167). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Sweller, J., & Chandler, P. (1994). Why some material is difficult to learn. Cogntion and Instruction, 12, 185–233.
Tuero, S., & GĂłmez Laich, M. P. (2012a). Análisis de los efectos de presentaciones en modalidades mĂşltiples en cogniciĂłn. Xiii congreso de lingĂĽĂstica sociedad argentina de lingĂĽĂstica IFDC - March 27–30, 2012, Potrero de los Funes, San Luis, Argentina.
Tuero, S., & GĂłmez Laich, M. P. (2012b). Sobrecarga cognitiva: RelaciĂłn entre presentaciones mĂşltiples en el proceso de lectura. In A. M. GarcĂa (Ed.), Aproximaciones teĂłricas y empĂricas a la lingĂĽĂstica cognitiva (pp. 335–345). Mar del Plata, Argentina: Editorial MartĂn.
Zwaan, R. A., Langston, M. C., & Graesser, A. C. (1995). The construction of situation models in narrative comprehension: An event-indexing model. Psychological Science, 6, 292–297.
Zwaan, R. A. (1999). Situation models: The mental leap into imagined worlds. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8, 15–18.
Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162–185.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Luchini, P.L. (2015). Simultaneous Reading and Listening Is Less Effective Than Reading Alone: A Study Based on Cognitive Load Theory. In: Piechurska-Kuciel, E., Szyszka, M. (eds) The Ecosystem of the Foreign Language Learner. Second Language Learning and Teaching. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14334-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14334-7_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-14333-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-14334-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)