Advertisement

Steps in Seismic Risk Mapping for Romania Capital City

  • E. F. ManeaEmail author
  • D. Toma-Danila
  • C. O. Cioflan
  • Gh. Marmureanu
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Physics book series (SPPHY, volume 163)

Abstract

Bucharest, capital of Romania, is one of the most seismically vulnerable cities in Europe. The earthquakes affecting the city have their origin in the Vrancea intermediate-depth source. In the last century, major earthquakes (November 10, 1940, Mw = 7.7; March 4, 1977, Mw = 7.4; August 30, 1986, Mw = 7.1; May 30, 1990, Mw = 6.9) produced significant effects for this area. This study’s objective is to highlight the seismic risk of Bucharest nowadays by estimating the possible building and human losses, for relevant scenarios—based on real data and neodeterministic approach. The building loss estimates were obtained through the Improved Displacement Coefficient Analytical Method. In order to provide a balanced input that can also reflect different damage states in the risk analysis, for the hazard data we used real data from seismic stations for August 30, 1986 and May 30, 1990 earthquakes and microzonation map for the maximum possible earthquake that can be produced in Vrancea intermediate-depth source (\(\mathrm{{M}}_\mathrm{{w}}\) = 7.8 and depth 150 km). The spectral content was used for peak ground acceleration (PGA) and spectral acceleration at 0.3 and 1 seconds. For the vulnerability assessment, data obtained from the “Danube Cross-Border system for Earthquakes Alert” (DACEA) Project and a database with classification of the buildings in 1999 were used. The analysis is performed at sector level (6 in total). We computed the probability of damage for the buildings and human casualties in terms of different injury types with SELENA Software.

Keywords

Peak Ground Acceleration Damage State Seismic Risk Spectral Acceleration Fragility Curve 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was made in the framework of the project BIGSEES: “BrInging the Gap between Seismology and Earthquake Engineering: from the Seismicity of Romania towards a refined implementation of seismic action EN1998-1 in earthquake resistant design of buildings” 72/2012, Poseizon PN 09–30 03 06 and PhD projects of Elena Florinela Manea and Dragos Toma-Danila.

References

  1. 1.
    M. Radulian, F. Vaccari, N. Mandrescu, G.F. Panza, C.L. Moldoveanu, Seismic hazard of Romania: deterministic approach. PAGEOPH 157, 221–247 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mărmureanu Gh. (coordonator), Cercetări privind hazardul seismic la nivel naţional şi local. Hărţi de hazard seismic general şi local (microzonare); Ed. Tehnopress, Iaşi (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. Balan et al., Cutremurul de Pamant din Romania de la 4 Martie, 1977. Ed. Academiei, Bucharest, Romania (1982)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), HAZUS-MH - Multi-hazard Loss Estimation Methodology, Earthquake Model (Advanced Engineering Building Module, FEMA, Washington DC, 2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. Molina, D.H. Lang, C.D. Lindholm, F. Lingvall, User Manual for the Earthquake Loss Estimation Tool: SELENA (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    D. Toma-Danila, C.O. Cioflan, S.F. Balan, E.F. Manea Characteristics and results of the near real-time system for estimating the seismic damage of Romania. Proceedings of the 5th national conference of earthquake engineering and the 1st national conference on earthquake engineering and seismology, Bucharest, Romania, 19–20 June 2014, pp 411–418Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    E. Erduran, D. Toma-Danila, A. Aldea et al., in Real Time Earthquake Damage Assessment in Romanian-Bulgarian Border, 15 World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, PortugalGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    G. Marmureanu, C.O. Cioflan, A. Marmureanu, Researches on Local Seismic Hazard (Microzonation) for Metropolitan Bucharest Area. (Tehnopress, Iasi, 2010) Accredited by ANCS, Code 89, ISBN: 978-973-702-809-9, p. 470Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    DACEA project (Danube Cross-border System for Earthquake Alert): http://quakeinfo.eu/en/
  10. 10.
    S. Cattari, E. Curti, S. Giovinazzi, S. Lagomarsino, S. Parodi, A. Penna, Un modello meccanico per l’analisi di vulnerabilita del costruitoin muratura a scala urbana, 11thConference “L’ingegneria Sismica in Italia”. Genoa, Italy (2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    GEM consequence database: http://gemecd.org/event/171
  12. 12.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. F. Manea
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • D. Toma-Danila
    • 1
    • 3
  • C. O. Cioflan
    • 1
  • Gh. Marmureanu
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Engineering SeismologyNational Institute for Earth PhysicsMagurele, BucharestRomania
  2. 2.Faculty of Physics, Department of Atmospheric PhysicsUniversity of BucharestBucharestRomania
  3. 3.Faculty of GeographyUniversity of BucharestBucharestRomania

Personalised recommendations