Abstract
Human water use around the globe continues to increase while available water supplies are threatened by contamination, climate change, and aging infrastructure. Effective management of water resources is essential to ensure that water is available when and where it is needed. A necessary first step is quantifying the amount of water needed and making this information readily available to decision-makers. Specifically, information is needed on both the total amount of water withdrawn and the portion of that water which is not returned to the source, at a spatial and temporal scale that will support management decisions. Quantifying this water loss (i.e., consumptive use) is important for gauging impacts to downstream water users and to maintaining functioning ecosystems. This effort can be challenging in large basins where water use data may be collected in various formats by numerous agencies utilizing different metrics. The objective of this chapter is to present a case study model developed for the Potomac River Basin in the United States. The model consists of a basin-wide analysis and mapping tool that incorporates monthly water use data from multiple political jurisdictions, estimates consumptive water use, displays raw and summary information in an interactive geospatial format, and shares information with stakeholders via an interactive web-based mapping tool. The developed tool is expected to assist in long-term local, state, and basin-wide comprehensive water resources planning; real-time drought management; and a better understanding of human impacts on water resources.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Vorosmarty CJ, Green P, Salisbury J, Lammers RB (2000) Global water resources: vulnerability from climate change and population growth. Science 289:284–288
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) (2006) Human development report 2006. Beyond scarcity: power, poverty and the global water crisis, p 388. http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/human-development-report-2006. Accessed 6 Oct 2014
Poff NL, Allan JD, Bain MB, Karr JR, Prestegaard KL, Richter BD, Sparks RE, Stromberg JC (1997) The natural flow regime. BioScience 47(11):769–784
Postel S, Richter B (2003) Rivers for life: managing water for people and nature. Island Press, Washington, DC, p 220
RCSE-Shinga University, ILEC (2011) Development of ILBM platform process: evolving guidelines through participatory improvement, p 502
Giuliani M, Castelletti A (2013) Assessing the value of cooperation and information exchange in large water resources systems by agent‐based optimization. Water Resour Res 49(7):3912–3926
Food and Agriculture Organization (2007) Coping with water scarcity. Challenge of the twenty-first century. UN-Water, p 29
Gerlak A, Lautze J, Giordano M (2011) Water resources data and information exchange in transboundary water treaties. Int Environ Agreements Polit Law Econ 11(2):179–199
Shiklomanov I (2000) Appraisal and assessment of world water resources. Water Int 25:11–32
Kenny JF, Barber NL, Hutson SS, Linsey KS, Lovelace JK, Maupin MA (2009) Estimated use of water in the United States in 2005. U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1344, p 52
Oki T, Kanae S (2006) Global hydrological cycles and world water resources. Science 313(5790):1068–1072
Weiskel PK, Vogel RM, Steeves PA, Zarriello PJ, DeSimone LA, Ries KG (2007) Water use regimes: characterizing direct human interaction with hydrologic systems. Water Resour Res 43(4). doi:10.1029/2006WR005062
Ahmed SN, Bencala KB, Schultz CL (2013) 2010 Washington metropolitan area water supply reliability study, part 2: potential impacts of climate change. Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin. Publication number ICPRB 13-07
Stagge JH, Moglen GE (2013) A nonparametric stochastic method for generating daily climate-adjusted streamflows. Water Resour Res 49:6179–6193. doi:10.1002/wrcr.20448
Sheer DP, Rivera MW, Wright BA, Day J (2013) Dynamic reservoir operations: managing for climate variability and change. Water Research Foundation. http://www.waterrf.org/Pages/Projects.aspx?PID=4306. Accessed 6 Oct 2014
Apse C, DePhilip M, Zimmerman J, Smith MP (2008) Developing instream flow criteria to support ecologically sustainable water resource planning and management. The Nature Conservancy, p 196
Cummins J, Buchanan C, Haywood C, Moltz H, Griggs A, Jones RC, Kraus R, Hitt N, Villella-Bumgardner R (2010) Potomac basin large river environmental flow needs. Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin. Publication number ICPRB 10-03
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, The Nature Conservancy, and Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin (2013) Middle Potomac River watershed assessment: Potomac River sustainable flow and water resources analysis. Available via ICPRB. http://www.potomacriver.org/pubs/pubs. Accessed 6 Oct 2014
Moltz H, Haywood C, Hoffman J (2011) Integrated water resources management in the Potomac River Basin paper. In: Integrated water resources management: the Emperor’s new clothes or indispensable process? Summer specialty conference, American Water Resources Association, Baltimore, 27–29 June 2011
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2010) Chesapeake Bay Phase 5.3 Community Watershed Model. EPA 903S10002—CBP/TRS-303-10
Shenk G, Wu J, Linker L (2012) Enhanced HSPF model structure for Chesapeake Bay watershed simulation. J Environ Eng 138(9):949–957. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000555
Shaffer KH (2009) Variations in withdrawal, return flow, and consumptive use of water in Ohio and Indiana, with selected data from Wisconsin, 1999–2004. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2009–5096, p 93
Gleick PH (2003) Water use. Annu Rev Environ Resour 28(1):275–314
Döll P, Kaspar F, Lehner B (2003) A global hydrological model for deriving water availability indicators: model tuning and validation. J Hydrol 270(1):105–134
Alcamo J, Döll P, Henrichs T, Kaspar F, Lehner B, Rösch T, Siebert S (2003) Development and testing of the WaterGAP 2 global model of water use and availability. Hydrol Sci J 48(3):317–337
Solley WB, Chase EB, Mann WB IV (1983) Estimated use of water in the United States in 1980. U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1001, p 56. http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/cir1001. Accessed 6 Oct 2014
Savenije HHG (2000) Water scarcity indicators; the deception of the numbers. Phys Chem Earth Pt B 25(3):199–204
Falkenmark M, Rockström J (2004) Balancing water for humans and nature: the new approach in ecohydrology. Earthscan, London, p 247
USGS Water Use Data in the United States. http://water.usgs.gov/watuse/data/. Accessed 6 Oct 2014
Shaffer KH, Runkle DL (2007) Consumptive water-use coefficients for the Great Lakes basin and climatically similar areas. USGS Scientific Investigations Report, p 191
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1990) Rainfall induced infiltration into sewer systems. Report to Congress. EPA/430/09-90/005
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1996) Seminar publication: national conference on sanitary sewer overflows, Washington, DC, 24–26 April 1996, EPA/625/R-96/007
Swarner R, Thompson M (1996) Modeling inflow and infiltration in separate sewer systems. In: Seminar publication—national conference on sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs), Washington, DC, 24–26 April 1996
Rutsch M, Rieckermann J, Cullmann J, Ellis JB, Vollertsen J, Krebs P (2008) Towards a better understanding of sewer exfiltration. Water Res 42(10–11):2385–2394
LaTour JK (1991) Determination of water use in Rockford and Kankakee areas, Illinois: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 90–4166, p 70
DeSimone LA (2002) Simulation of ground-water flow and evaluation of water-management alternatives in the Assabet River Basin, eastern Massachusetts. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2004–5114, p 133
Mullaney JR (2004) Water use, ground-water recharge and availability, and quality of water in the Greenwich area, Fairfield County, Connecticut and Westchester County, New York, 2000–2002: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 03–4300, p 64
Horn MA, Moore RB, Hayes L, Flanagan SM (2008) Methods for and estimates of 2003 and projected water use in the Seacoast region, southeastern New Hampshire: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2007–5157, p 87
Tessler S (2002) Data model and relational database design for the New England water-use data system (NEWUDS). US Geological Survey Open File Report 1359. http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2001/ofr01359/. Accessed 6 Oct 2014
The Open Source Initiative (OSI) (2013) The Open Source Definition. http://opensource.org/osd. Accessed 6 Oct 2014
Open Source Geospatial Foundation (OSGEO) (2013) OpenLayers. http://openlayers.org. Accessed 6 Oct 2014
Stamen (2014) Map tiles by Stamen Design, under Creative Commons BY 3.0. Data by OpenStreetMap under CC BY SA
OpenGeo (2013) GeoServer. http://geoserver.org/. Accessed 6 Oct 2014
Apache Software Foundation (2013) Apache Tomcat. http://tomcat.apache.org. Accessed 6 Oct 2014
PostgreSQL Global Development Group (PostgreSQL GDG) (2013) PostgreSQL. http://www.postgresql.org/about. Accessed 6 Oct 2014
Refractions Research (2008) PostGIS. http://refractions.net/products/postgis. Accessed 6 Oct 2014
IOLA (2013) Flot: attractive Javascript plotting for jQuery. http://www.flotcharts.org/. Accessed 6 Oct 2014
StreamStats. http://water.usgs.gov/osw/streamstats/. Accessed 6 Oct 2014
Maryland StreamStats. https://streamstatsags.cr.usgs.gov/md_swuds/Index.aspx. Accessed 6 Oct 2014
Pennsylvania: Department of Environmental Protection (2012). Yield analysis tool (version 2.0) [computer software]. Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
Virginia Water Supply Planning Program—Annual Water Withdrawal Reporting. http://www.deq.virginia.gov/Programs/Water/WaterSupplyWaterQuantity/WaterSupplyPWaterSu/AnnualWaterWithdrawalReporting.aspx. Accessed 3 Nov 2014
West Virginia Water Withdrawal Guidance Tool. http://www.dep.wv.gov/WWE/wateruse/Pages/WaterWithdrawal.aspx. Accessed 6 Oct 2014
Michigan’s Water Withdrawal Assessment Tool. http://www.deq.state.mi.us/wwat/. Accessed 6 Oct 2014
Colorado Decision Support Systems: cdss.state.co.us/Pages/CDSSHome.aspx. Accessed 6 Oct 2014
Great Lakes Regional Water Use Database. http://projects.glc.org/waterusedata/. Accessed 6 Oct 2014
Susquehanna River Basin Commission. http://www.srbc.net/planning/cwuas.htm. Accessed 6 Oct 2014
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ducnuigeen, J., Ahmed, S.N., Bencala, K.R., Moltz, H.L.N., Nagel, A., Schultz, C.L. (2015). Interactive Geospatial Analysis Tool for Estimating Watershed-Scale Consumptive Use: Potomac River Basin Case Study. In: Younos, T., Parece, T. (eds) Advances in Watershed Science and Assessment. The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, vol 33. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14212-8_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14212-8_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-14211-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-14212-8
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)