Skip to main content

Interactive Geospatial Analysis Tool for Estimating Watershed-Scale Consumptive Use: Potomac River Basin Case Study

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry ((HEC,volume 33))

Abstract

Human water use around the globe continues to increase while available water supplies are threatened by contamination, climate change, and aging infrastructure. Effective management of water resources is essential to ensure that water is available when and where it is needed. A necessary first step is quantifying the amount of water needed and making this information readily available to decision-makers. Specifically, information is needed on both the total amount of water withdrawn and the portion of that water which is not returned to the source, at a spatial and temporal scale that will support management decisions. Quantifying this water loss (i.e., consumptive use) is important for gauging impacts to downstream water users and to maintaining functioning ecosystems. This effort can be challenging in large basins where water use data may be collected in various formats by numerous agencies utilizing different metrics. The objective of this chapter is to present a case study model developed for the Potomac River Basin in the United States. The model consists of a basin-wide analysis and mapping tool that incorporates monthly water use data from multiple political jurisdictions, estimates consumptive water use, displays raw and summary information in an interactive geospatial format, and shares information with stakeholders via an interactive web-based mapping tool. The developed tool is expected to assist in long-term local, state, and basin-wide comprehensive water resources planning; real-time drought management; and a better understanding of human impacts on water resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Vorosmarty CJ, Green P, Salisbury J, Lammers RB (2000) Global water resources: vulnerability from climate change and population growth. Science 289:284–288

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) (2006) Human development report 2006. Beyond scarcity: power, poverty and the global water crisis, p 388. http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/human-development-report-2006. Accessed 6 Oct 2014

  3. Poff NL, Allan JD, Bain MB, Karr JR, Prestegaard KL, Richter BD, Sparks RE, Stromberg JC (1997) The natural flow regime. BioScience 47(11):769–784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Postel S, Richter B (2003) Rivers for life: managing water for people and nature. Island Press, Washington, DC, p 220

    Google Scholar 

  5. RCSE-Shinga University, ILEC (2011) Development of ILBM platform process: evolving guidelines through participatory improvement, p 502

    Google Scholar 

  6. Giuliani M, Castelletti A (2013) Assessing the value of cooperation and information exchange in large water resources systems by agent‐based optimization. Water Resour Res 49(7):3912–3926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Food and Agriculture Organization (2007) Coping with water scarcity. Challenge of the twenty-first century. UN-Water, p 29

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gerlak A, Lautze J, Giordano M (2011) Water resources data and information exchange in transboundary water treaties. Int Environ Agreements Polit Law Econ 11(2):179–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Shiklomanov I (2000) Appraisal and assessment of world water resources. Water Int 25:11–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kenny JF, Barber NL, Hutson SS, Linsey KS, Lovelace JK, Maupin MA (2009) Estimated use of water in the United States in 2005. U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1344, p 52

    Google Scholar 

  11. Oki T, Kanae S (2006) Global hydrological cycles and world water resources. Science 313(5790):1068–1072

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Weiskel PK, Vogel RM, Steeves PA, Zarriello PJ, DeSimone LA, Ries KG (2007) Water use regimes: characterizing direct human interaction with hydrologic systems. Water Resour Res 43(4). doi:10.1029/2006WR005062

  13. Ahmed SN, Bencala KB, Schultz CL (2013) 2010 Washington metropolitan area water supply reliability study, part 2: potential impacts of climate change. Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin. Publication number ICPRB 13-07

    Google Scholar 

  14. Stagge JH, Moglen GE (2013) A nonparametric stochastic method for generating daily climate-adjusted streamflows. Water Resour Res 49:6179–6193. doi:10.1002/wrcr.20448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sheer DP, Rivera MW, Wright BA, Day J (2013) Dynamic reservoir operations: managing for climate variability and change. Water Research Foundation. http://www.waterrf.org/Pages/Projects.aspx?PID=4306. Accessed 6 Oct 2014

  16. Apse C, DePhilip M, Zimmerman J, Smith MP (2008) Developing instream flow criteria to support ecologically sustainable water resource planning and management. The Nature Conservancy, p 196

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cummins J, Buchanan C, Haywood C, Moltz H, Griggs A, Jones RC, Kraus R, Hitt N, Villella-Bumgardner R (2010) Potomac basin large river environmental flow needs. Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin. Publication number ICPRB 10-03

    Google Scholar 

  18. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, The Nature Conservancy, and Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin (2013) Middle Potomac River watershed assessment: Potomac River sustainable flow and water resources analysis. Available via ICPRB. http://www.potomacriver.org/pubs/pubs. Accessed 6 Oct 2014

  19. Moltz H, Haywood C, Hoffman J (2011) Integrated water resources management in the Potomac River Basin paper. In: Integrated water resources management: the Emperor’s new clothes or indispensable process? Summer specialty conference, American Water Resources Association, Baltimore, 27–29 June 2011

    Google Scholar 

  20. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2010) Chesapeake Bay Phase 5.3 Community Watershed Model. EPA 903S10002—CBP/TRS-303-10

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shenk G, Wu J, Linker L (2012) Enhanced HSPF model structure for Chesapeake Bay watershed simulation. J Environ Eng 138(9):949–957. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000555

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Shaffer KH (2009) Variations in withdrawal, return flow, and consumptive use of water in Ohio and Indiana, with selected data from Wisconsin, 1999–2004. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2009–5096, p 93

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gleick PH (2003) Water use. Annu Rev Environ Resour 28(1):275–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Döll P, Kaspar F, Lehner B (2003) A global hydrological model for deriving water availability indicators: model tuning and validation. J Hydrol 270(1):105–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Alcamo J, Döll P, Henrichs T, Kaspar F, Lehner B, Rösch T, Siebert S (2003) Development and testing of the WaterGAP 2 global model of water use and availability. Hydrol Sci J 48(3):317–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Solley WB, Chase EB, Mann WB IV (1983) Estimated use of water in the United States in 1980. U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1001, p 56. http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/cir1001. Accessed 6 Oct 2014

  27. Savenije HHG (2000) Water scarcity indicators; the deception of the numbers. Phys Chem Earth Pt B 25(3):199–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Falkenmark M, Rockström J (2004) Balancing water for humans and nature: the new approach in ecohydrology. Earthscan, London, p 247

    Google Scholar 

  29. USGS Water Use Data in the United States. http://water.usgs.gov/watuse/data/. Accessed 6 Oct 2014

  30. Shaffer KH, Runkle DL (2007) Consumptive water-use coefficients for the Great Lakes basin and climatically similar areas. USGS Scientific Investigations Report, p 191

    Google Scholar 

  31. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1990) Rainfall induced infiltration into sewer systems. Report to Congress. EPA/430/09-90/005

    Google Scholar 

  32. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1996) Seminar publication: national conference on sanitary sewer overflows, Washington, DC, 24–26 April 1996, EPA/625/R-96/007

    Google Scholar 

  33. Swarner R, Thompson M (1996) Modeling inflow and infiltration in separate sewer systems. In: Seminar publication—national conference on sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs), Washington, DC, 24–26 April 1996

    Google Scholar 

  34. Rutsch M, Rieckermann J, Cullmann J, Ellis JB, Vollertsen J, Krebs P (2008) Towards a better understanding of sewer exfiltration. Water Res 42(10–11):2385–2394

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. LaTour JK (1991) Determination of water use in Rockford and Kankakee areas, Illinois: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 90–4166, p 70

    Google Scholar 

  36. DeSimone LA (2002) Simulation of ground-water flow and evaluation of water-management alternatives in the Assabet River Basin, eastern Massachusetts. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2004–5114, p 133

    Google Scholar 

  37. Mullaney JR (2004) Water use, ground-water recharge and availability, and quality of water in the Greenwich area, Fairfield County, Connecticut and Westchester County, New York, 2000–2002: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 03–4300, p 64

    Google Scholar 

  38. Horn MA, Moore RB, Hayes L, Flanagan SM (2008) Methods for and estimates of 2003 and projected water use in the Seacoast region, southeastern New Hampshire: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2007–5157, p 87

    Google Scholar 

  39. Tessler S (2002) Data model and relational database design for the New England water-use data system (NEWUDS). US Geological Survey Open File Report 1359. http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2001/ofr01359/. Accessed 6 Oct 2014

  40. The Open Source Initiative (OSI) (2013) The Open Source Definition. http://opensource.org/osd. Accessed 6 Oct 2014

  41. Open Source Geospatial Foundation (OSGEO) (2013) OpenLayers. http://openlayers.org. Accessed 6 Oct 2014

  42. Stamen (2014) Map tiles by Stamen Design, under Creative Commons BY 3.0. Data by OpenStreetMap under CC BY SA

    Google Scholar 

  43. OpenGeo (2013) GeoServer. http://geoserver.org/. Accessed 6 Oct 2014

  44. Apache Software Foundation (2013) Apache Tomcat. http://tomcat.apache.org. Accessed 6 Oct 2014

  45. PostgreSQL Global Development Group (PostgreSQL GDG) (2013) PostgreSQL. http://www.postgresql.org/about. Accessed 6 Oct 2014

  46. Refractions Research (2008) PostGIS. http://refractions.net/products/postgis. Accessed 6 Oct 2014

  47. IOLA (2013) Flot: attractive Javascript plotting for jQuery. http://www.flotcharts.org/. Accessed 6 Oct 2014

  48. StreamStats. http://water.usgs.gov/osw/streamstats/. Accessed 6 Oct 2014

  49. Maryland StreamStats. https://streamstatsags.cr.usgs.gov/md_swuds/Index.aspx. Accessed 6 Oct 2014

  50. Pennsylvania: Department of Environmental Protection (2012). Yield analysis tool (version 2.0) [computer software]. Harrisburg, Pennsylvania

    Google Scholar 

  51. Virginia Water Supply Planning Program—Annual Water Withdrawal Reporting. http://www.deq.virginia.gov/Programs/Water/WaterSupplyWaterQuantity/WaterSupplyPWaterSu/AnnualWaterWithdrawalReporting.aspx. Accessed 3 Nov 2014

  52. West Virginia Water Withdrawal Guidance Tool. http://www.dep.wv.gov/WWE/wateruse/Pages/WaterWithdrawal.aspx. Accessed 6 Oct 2014

  53. Michigan’s Water Withdrawal Assessment Tool. http://www.deq.state.mi.us/wwat/. Accessed 6 Oct 2014

  54. Colorado Decision Support Systems: cdss.state.co.us/Pages/CDSSHome.aspx. Accessed 6 Oct 2014

  55. Great Lakes Regional Water Use Database. http://projects.glc.org/waterusedata/. Accessed 6 Oct 2014

  56. Susquehanna River Basin Commission. http://www.srbc.net/planning/cwuas.htm. Accessed 6 Oct 2014

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cherie L. Schultz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ducnuigeen, J., Ahmed, S.N., Bencala, K.R., Moltz, H.L.N., Nagel, A., Schultz, C.L. (2015). Interactive Geospatial Analysis Tool for Estimating Watershed-Scale Consumptive Use: Potomac River Basin Case Study. In: Younos, T., Parece, T. (eds) Advances in Watershed Science and Assessment. The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, vol 33. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14212-8_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics