Skip to main content

Different Features of Transition Economies: Institutions Matter

  • Chapter
Family Businesses in Transition Economies

Abstract

Process of transition is most simply defined as a process which includes moving from centrally planned to market oriented economy. There is no uniqueness about which countries are transitional ones, as their geographical, cultural, economic and overall social context disables forming of one unique sample that would fit in every analysis. The main aspects of transition process are liberalization, macroeconomic stabilization, privatization and legal and institutional reforms. Our definition of institutions assumes Douglass North’s concept of institutions which defines institutions as the rules or regulations (humanly devised constraints) that structure political, economic and social interaction while institutional environment comprises institutions (formal and informal ones) and an enforcement mechanism. The quality of institutions in this chapter is measured by World Governance Indicators. The subject of this chapter is the analysis of quality of institutions and institutional environment in five Western Balkan countries and analysis of implications of institutional environment on overall standard of living and competitiveness of these countries. Our results indicate that Western Balkan countries lag significantly behind Central European countries in terms of institutional quality. The widening gap between the standard of living in Western Balkan countries and Central European countries in last 10 years indicates that the crucial problem in Western Balkan countries is the speed of reforms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Even if analyzed by many authors as an example of unique transitional country, progress in transition is not assessed in China by Transition Reports, as it would require individual analysis due to its size and special path of reforms.

  2. 2.

    Douglas North, the Nobel laureate who defined institutions and institutional change, referred to the role of institutions and their importance for transition economies in his annual lecture for UNU/WIDER (North, 1997).

  3. 3.

    PPP stands for Purchasing Power Parity.

  4. 4.

    All tables with data for following figures can be found in Appendices (Tables 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7).

  5. 5.

    Data for Diagram 1 and Diagram 2 are in Appendices in Table 8.

  6. 6.

    Data for Diagram 3 are in Appendices in Table 9.

References

  • Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. (2004). Institutions as the fundamentals cause of long-run growth (NBER Working Paper 10481). Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. (2010). The role of institutions in growth and development. Review of Economics and Institutions, 1(2). doi:10.5202/rei.v1i2.1, ISSN:2038-1379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, T., & Laeven, L. (2005). Institution building and growth in transition economies (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3657).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevan, A., & Estrin, S. (2004). The determinants of foreign direct investment into European transition economies. Journal of Comparative Economics, 32, 775–787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campos, N. (2000). Context is everything: Measuring institutional change in transition economies (Policy Research Working Paper 2269). World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dana, L. P., & Dana, T. (2003). Management and enterprise development in post-communist economies. International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development, 1(I), 45–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dollar, D., & Kraay, A. (2003). Institutions, trade, and growth (Policy Research Working Paper). The World Bank Development Research Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • EBRD. (2013). Transition report 2013, stuck in transition. London: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Efendic, A., Pugh, G., & Adnett, N. (2010). Institutions and economic performance: System GMM modelling of institutional effects in transition. On-line publication: AAB-RIINVEST University in Pristina, Kosovo. Available at: http://www.riinvestinstitute.org/pdf/Efendic_et_al.pdf

  • Eicher, T., & Leukert, A. (2009). Institutions and economic performance: Endogeneity and parameter heterogeneity. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 41(1), 197–219. doi:10.1111/j.1538-4616.2008.00193.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estrin, S., Hanousek, J., Kocenda, E., & Svejnar, J. (2009). Effects of privatization and ownership in transition economies (Working Paper 4881). The World Bank Development Economics Department.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, S., & Gelb, A. (1991). The process of socialist economic transformation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(4), 91–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, S., & Sahay, R. (2004). Transition economies: The role of institutions and initial conditions. IMF. Preliminary Draft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R., & Jones, C. (1998). Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than others (NBER Working Paper 6564). Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Havrylyshyn, O., & Wolf, T. (1999). Determinants of growth in transition countries. IMF Finance and Development, 36(2), 12–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Monetary Fund. (2000). Transition economies: An IMF perspective on progress and prospects (Issue Briefs 00/08).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2010). The worldwide governance indicators methodology and analytical issues (Policy Research Working Papers 5430). World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knack, S., & Keefer, P. (1995). Institutions and economic performance: Cross country test using alternative institutional measures. Economics and Politics, 7(3), 208–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolodko, G. W. (1999). Transition to a market economy and sustained growth. Implications for the post-Washington consensus. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 32, 233–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kornai, J. (1999). Reforming the welfare state in postsocialist economies. In A. Brown (Ed.), When is transition over? (pp. 99–114). Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, R., de Silanes, F. L., Schleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1998). The quality of government (NBER Working Paper 6727). Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavigne, M. (1999). What is still missing? In A. Brown (Ed.), When is transition over? (pp. 13–38). Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murrell, P. (1996). How far has the transition progressed? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10, 25–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murrell, P. (2003). Institutions and firms in transition economies. Draft prepared as a chapter of the Handbook of new institutional economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • North, D. (1997, March). The contribution of the new institutional economics to an understanding of the transition problem. In 1st Annual lecture UNU WIDER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petković, S., & Berberović, S. (2013). Ekonomika i upravljanje malim i srednjim preduzećima. Banja Luka: Ekonomski fakultet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popov, V. (2007). Shock therapy versus gradualism reconsidered: Lessons from transition economies after 15 years of reforms. Comparative Economic Studies, 49, 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramadani, V., & Dana, L. P. (2013). The state of entrepreneurship in the Balkans: Evidence from selected countries. In V. Ramadani & R. C. Schneider (Eds.), Entrepreneurship in the Balkans. Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D., Subramanian, A., & Trebbi, F. (2002). Institutions rule: The primacy of institutions over geography and integration in economic development (NBER Working Paper 9305). Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roland, G. (2000). Transition and economics: Politics, markets, and firms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roland, G. (2002). The political economy of transition. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(1), 29–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roland, G., & Verdier, T. (1999). Law enforcement and transition (Working Paper No. 262). William Davidson Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, J. (2012, March) What I did in Russia, Personal website. http://jeffsachs.org/2012/03/what-i-did-in-russia/

  • Stiglitz, J. (1999). Whiter reform, ten years of the transition. Key note address. In World Bank annual conference on development economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeten, P. (1996). Governance. In M. G. Quibria & J. M. Dowling (Eds.), Current issues in economic development. An Asian perspective (pp. 27–66). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svejnar, J. (2002). Transition economies: Performance and challenges. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(1), 3–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tešić, J. (2010). Institutional environment and foreign direct investment in the Western Balkans. In S. Milford & I. Tarosy (Eds.), The Western Balkans—Lessons from the past and future prospects: A view from the Danube Region. Institute for the Danube Region and Central Europe and IDResearch Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomaš, R. (2013). Causes of slow and inefficient transition of economy of Bosnia and Herzegovina and possibilities for its improvement. Poslovna izvrsnost, god. VII, br. I. Ekonomski fakultet Zagreb, pp. 99–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (1994). Governance. The World Bank’s experience. Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (1998). Beyond the Washington consensus: Institutions matter. Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2002). Transition the first ten years analysis and lessons for Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union. Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žarković, V. (2012). Privatizacija u Centralnoj i Istocnoj Evropi. Banja Luka: Ekonomski fakultet.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Global Competitiveness Index Data Platform. http://www.weforum.org/issues/competitiveness-0/gci2012-data-platform/

  • World Governance Indicators Database, February 2014. Official web page http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/index.aspx#home

  • World Economic Outlook Database, International Monetary Fund. http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2013/02/weodata/index.aspx

  • Keefer, P., & Knack, S. (2005). Social capital, social norms and the new institutional economics. In C. Ménard & M. Shirley (Eds.), The handbook of the new institutional economics (pp. 701–726). Dordecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kołodko, G. W. (2002). Globalization and catching-up in transition economies. Rochester: University of Rochester Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jelena Trivić .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendices

Table 1 Voice and accountability
Table 2 Political stability
Table 3 Government effectiveness
Table 4 Regulatory quality
Table 5 Rule of law
Table 6 Control of corruption
Table 7 Average of six indicators of institutional quality
Table 8 Three years average of institutional quality, GDP/pc and competitiveness level in the Western Balkans and Central European Economies
Table 9 Absolute difference in GDP/pc and absolute difference in WGI between averages in Western Balkans and Central European Economies

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Trivić, J., Petković, S. (2015). Different Features of Transition Economies: Institutions Matter. In: Dana, LP., Ramadani, V. (eds) Family Businesses in Transition Economies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14209-8_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics