Skip to main content

Progress Testing of Information Literacy versus Information Literacy Self-Efficacy in Medical Students

  • Conference paper
Information Literacy. Lifelong Learning and Digital Citizenship in the 21st Century (ECIL 2014)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 492))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Progress testing is a common assessment tool within medical schools. A similar assessment tool, the “Progress Test of Information Literacy” (PTIL) has been created. To become an information literate person, information literacy self-efficacy (ILSE) is a meaningful part and important to evaluate. In this study, every PTIL-item has been mapped with an item of the 38-ILSE scale. Even though the mapping turned out to be delicate and context related, the results of this study suggests a relation between PTIL and specific ILSE items. Students of the first two medical years scored better for certain PTIL questions compared to students in the last years. In addition, students from year 1 were less certain about their answers. Once extra-integrated IL courses were organized, students were much more certain about their answers. Integrated and repeated IL-courses are necessary throughout the whole curriculum.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Kiliç-Cakmak, E.: Learning Strategies and Motivational Factors Predicting Information Literacy Self-efficacy of E-learners. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 26(2), 192–208 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aper, L., Reniers, J., Koole, S., Valcke, M., Derese, A.: Impact of Three Alternative Consultation Training Formats on Self-efficacy and Consultation Skills of Medical Students. Medical Teacher 34, e500–e507 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Storie, D., Campbell, S.: Determining the Information Literacy Needs of a Medical and Dental Faculty. Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association 33, 48–59 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Association of College and Research Libraries: Information Literacy Standards for Higher Education (2000), http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/standards/informationliteracycompetency.cfm

  5. Bandura, A.: Self-efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavior Change. Psychological Review 84, 1991–215 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sattar Khan, A., Cansever, Z., Avsar, Z.A., Acemoglu, H.: Perceived Self-Efficacy and Academic Performance of Medical Students at Ataturk University, Turkey. Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan 23(7), 495–498 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Interuniversitaire VoortgangsToets Geneeskunde, http://www.ivtg.nl

  8. Wrigley, W., Van der Vleuten, C.P., Freeman, A., Muijtens, A.: A Systematic Framework for the Progress Test: Strengths, Constraints and Issues: AMEE Guide No. 71. Medical Teacher 34, 683–697 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. De Meulemeester, A.: The “Information Literacy Self-efficacy Scale” and the Medical Curriculum at Ghent University. In: Kurbanoğlu, S., Grassian, E., Mizrachi, D., Catts, R., Špiranec, S. (eds.) ECIL 2013. CCIS, vol. 397, pp. 465–470. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Kurbanoglu, S.S., Akkoyunlu, B., Umay, A.: Developing the Information Literacy Self-efficacy Scale. Journal of Documentation 62(6), 730–743 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Profiel van de arts van de 21ste eeuw, https://www.ugent.be/ge/nl/onderwijs/copy_of_opleidingen/eindtermen

  12. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria (2014), www.R-project.org

  13. Sim, S.-M., Rasiah, R.I.: Relationship Between Item Difficulty and Discrimination Indices in True/False-Type Multiple Choice Questions of a Para-clinical Multidisciplinary Paper. Ann. Acad. Med. Singapore 35, 67–71 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Vantini, I., Benini, L.: Models of Learning, Training and Progress Evaluation of Medical Students. Clinica Chimica Acta 393, 13–16 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Islam, M.A.: Assessing Information Literacy Competency of Information Science and Library Management Graduate Students of Dhaka University. IFLA Journal 36(4), 300–315 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

De Meulemeester, A., Buysse, H. (2014). Progress Testing of Information Literacy versus Information Literacy Self-Efficacy in Medical Students. In: Kurbanoğlu, S., Špiranec, S., Grassian, E., Mizrachi, D., Catts, R. (eds) Information Literacy. Lifelong Learning and Digital Citizenship in the 21st Century. ECIL 2014. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 492. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14136-7_38

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14136-7_38

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-14135-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-14136-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics