Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Conflict and Multimodal Communication pp 71–89Cite as

Revenge and Conflict: Social and Cognitive Aspects

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Computational Social Sciences ((CSS))

Abstract

Revenge can be conceptualized as an attempt to restore the power balance destroyed by an aggression. It can be risky and costly for the individuals, and it can become completely disruptive at the social and societal level. At the individual level, revenge implies the risk of a counterattack, either coming from the target or from his or her kin and relatives, and it is costly because of the effort it requires. At the social level, a likely and dangerous consequence of revenge is the emergence of feuds, with whole families and groups fighting against each other. Moreover, material resources can get wasted in the conflict, thus further increasing the costs of revenge. Even so, revenge is still part of our behavioral repertoire, humans take revenge continuously, both at a small and at a larger scale. How could have revenge survived if it is costly and dysfunctional? Why do humans still resort to revenge when reacting to a wrong suffered?

The aim of this chapter is to apply cognitive analysis in order to unveil the tension between a need for equity restoration and the related dangers, showing that revenge exploits other social mechanisms, like fairness and equity restoration. We will go through the motivations of an avenger, and we will bridge individual and social factors in order to understand the complex relationship between individuals’ motivations to take revenge and the constraints imposed by societies. We posit that revenge had to be restrained by societies in order to prevent conflicts, and this was done by limiting the contexts in which revenge may take place, thus transforming it into an institution in which revenge is regulated (e.g., Kanun in Albania), or promoting alternative ways of reacting, like punishment and sanction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andrighetto G, Conte R, Giardini F (2012a) Institutions evolving through the mind. A cognitive and computational approach. In: Paglieri F, Tummolini L, Falcone R, Miceli M (eds) The goals of cognition. Essays in honor of Cristiano Castelfranchi. College Publications, London, pp345–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrighetto G, Giardini F, Conte R (2012b). An evolutionary account of reactions to a wrong. COGSCI 2013 - 35th annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Berlin, July 31–August 3 2013. Proceedings, Cognitive Science Society, 2013, pp 1756–1761

    Google Scholar 

  • Barash DP, Lipton JE (2011) Payback: why we retaliate, redirect aggression and seek revenge. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister RF (1997) Evil: inside human cruelty and violence. Freeman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker GS (1968) Crime and punishment: an economic approach. J Polit Econ 76:169–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentham J (1962) Principles of penal law. In: Bowring J (ed) The works of Jeremy Bentham. Russell and Russell, New York, pp 365–580

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehm C (1984) Blood revenge: the enactment and management of conflict in Montenegro and other tribal societies. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, PA

    Google Scholar 

  • Brosnan SF (2011) A hypothesis of the co-evolution of inequity and cooperation. Front Neurosci 5:43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brosnan SF (2013) Justice- and fairness-related behaviors in nonhuman primates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110(Suppl 2):10416–10423

    Google Scholar 

  • Brosnan SF, Freeman C, De Waal FBM (2006) Partner’s behavior, not reward distribution, determines success in an unequal cooperative task in capuchin monkeys. Am J Primatol 68(7):713–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss DM (1988) From vigilance to violence: tactics of mate retention in american undergraduates. Ethol Sociobiol 9:291–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss DM, Shackelford TK (1997) From vigilance to violence: mate retention tactics in married couples. J Pers Soc Psychol 72:346–361

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsmith KM, Wilson TD, Gilbert DT (2008) The paradoxical consequences of revenge. J Pers Soc Psychol 95:1316–1324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chagnon N (1988) Life histories, blood revenge, and warfare in a tribal population. Science 239:985–992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chagnon N (2013) Noble savages: my life among two dangerous tribes – the Yanomamo and the anthropologists. Simon and Schuster, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH, Parker GA (1995) Punishment in animal societies. Nature 373:209–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen D (1996) Law, social policy, and violence: the impact of regional cultures. J Pers Soc Psychol 70:961–978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen D, Nisbett RE (1994) Self-protection and the culture of honor: explaining southern homicide. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 20:551–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen D, Nisbett RE (1997) Field experiments examining the culture of honor: the role of institutions in perpetuating norms about violence. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 23:1188–1199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen D, Nisbett RE, Bowdle BF, Schwartz N (1996) Insult, aggression, and the southern culture of honor: an “experimental ethnography”. J Pers Soc Psychol 70:945–960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly M, Wilson M (1988) Homicide. Aldine de Gruyter, Hawthorne, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • De Quervain DJF, Fischbacher U, Treyer V, Schellhammer M, Schnyder U, Buck A, Fehr E (2004) The neural basis of altruistic punishment. Science 305:1254–1258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elster J (1990) Norms of revenge. Ethics 100(4):862–885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr E, Gachter S (2000) Cooperation and punishment in Public Goods Experiments. Am Econ Rev 90:980–994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr E, Gachter S (2002) Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature 415:137–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr E, Schmidt KM (1999) A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quart J Econ 114:817–868

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Flinn MV (1988) Mate guarding in a Caribbean village. Ethol Sociobiol 9:1–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank RH (1988) Passions within reason: the strategic role of the emotions. Norton, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • French PA (2001) The virtues of vengeance. The University Press of Kansas, Kansas

    Google Scholar 

  • Frijda NH (1994) The Lex Talionis: on vengeance. In: van Goozen SHM, van der Poll NE, Sergeant JA (eds) Emotions: essays on emotion theory. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 263–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner A, West SA (2004) Cooperation and punishment, especially in humans. Am Nat 164:753–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giardini F, Andrighetto G, Conte R (2010) A cognitive model of punishment, Proceedings of the 32nd annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Cognitive Science Society, Austin, TX, pp 1282–1288

    Google Scholar 

  • Gjeov S (1989) Kanuni i leke dukagjinit. Albanian text collected and arranged by Shtjefn Gjeov. Gjonlekaj Publishing Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gollwitzer M, Denzler M (2009) What makes revenge sweet: seeing the offender suffer or delivering a message? J Exp Soc Psychol 45:840–844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gould RV (2003) Collision of Wills: how ambiguity about social rank breeds conflict. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Hafer C, Bègue L (2005) Experimental research on just-world theory: problems, developments, and future challenges. Psychol Bull 131(1):128–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henrich J, Boyd R (2001) Why people punish defectors. Weak conformist transmission can stabilize costly enforcement of norms in cooperative dilemmas. J Theor Biol 208:79–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henrich J, McElreath R, Barr A, Ensminger J, Barrett C, Bolyanatz A et al (2006) Costly punishment across human societies. Science 312(5781):1767–1770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby S (1983) Wild justice: the evolution of revenge. Harper & Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen K (2010) Punishment and spite, the dark side of cooperation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 365:2635–2650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen K, Call J, Tomasello M (2007) Chimpanzees are vengeful but not spiteful. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104:13046–13050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karremans JC, Van Lange PAM, Ouwerkerk JW, Kluwer ES (2003) When forgiving enhances psychological well being: the role of interpersonal commitment. J Pers Soc Psychol 84:1011–1026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelsen H (1943) Society and nature. A sociological inquiry. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim SH, Smith RH (1993) Revenge and conflict escalation. Negotiation J 9:37–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner MJ (1977) The justice motive: some hypotheses as to its origins and forms. J Pers45(1):1–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner M, Simmons CH (1966) Observer’s reaction to the ‘Innocent Victim’: compassion or rejection? J Pers Soc Psychol 4(2):203–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz K (1966) On aggression. Methuen, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Maltby J, Macaskill A, Day L (2001) Failure to forgive self and others: a replication and extension of the relationship between forgiveness, personality, social desirability, and general health. Pers Individ Dif 30:881–885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauger PA, Perry JE, Freeman T, Grove DC, McBride AG, McKinney KE (1992) The measurement of forgiveness: preliminary research. J Psychol Christ 11:170–180

    Google Scholar 

  • McCullough ME (2008) Beyond revenge: the evolution of the forgiveness instinct. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • McCullough ME, Kurzban R, Tabak BA (2013) A cognitive system for revenge and forgiveness. Behav Brain Sci 36:1–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miceli M, Castelfranchi C (2011) Forgiveness: a cognitive-motivational anatomy. J Theory Soc Behav 41(3):260–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller DT (2001) Disrespect and the experience of injustice. Annu Rev Psychol 52:527–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett RE (1993) Violence and U. S. regional culture. Am Psychol 48:441–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett RE, Cohen D (1996) Culture of honor. Westview Press, Boulder, CO

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner R (1980) Retribution and related concepts of punishment. Journal of Legal Studies 9:71–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salman A (2002) Forgiveness: origins dynamics, psychopathology and technical relevance. Psychoanal Q 71:175–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackelford TK (2005) An evolutionary psychological analysis of cultures of honor. Evol Psychol 3:381–391

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackelford TK, Goetz AT, Buss DM, Euler HA, Hoier S (2005) When we hurt the ones we love: predicting violence against women from men’s mate retention tactics. Pers Relat 12:447–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stillwell AM, Baumeister RF, Priore D (2008) We’re all victims here: toward a psychology of revenge. Basic Appl Soc Psychol 30(3):253–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subkoviak MJ, Enright RD, Wu C, Gassin EA, Freedman S, Olson LM, Sarinopoulos I (1995) Measuring interpersonal forgiveness in late adolescence and middle adulthood. J Adolesc 18:641–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tripp TM, Bies RJ (1997) What’s good about revenge? The avengers’ perspective. In: Lewicki RJ, Bies RJ, Sheppard BH (eds) Research on negotiation in organizations, vol 6. JAI, Greenwich, CT, pp 145–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidmar N (2001) Retribution and revenge. In: Sanders J, Hamilton VL (eds) Handbook of justice research in law. Kluwer, New York, pp 31–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Walster E, Walster G, Berscheid E (1978) Equity: theory and research. Allyn and Bacon, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaibert L (2006) Punishment and revenge. Law Philos 25:81–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Agent-based Social Simulation (LABSS), Institute of Cognitive Science and Technologies, National Research Council of Italy, via Palestro 32, 00185, Rome, Italy

    Francesca Giardini Ph.D. & Rosaria Conte

Authors
  1. Francesca Giardini Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rosaria Conte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesca Giardini Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Uninettuno University, Roma, Italy

    Francesca D'Errico

  2. Università Roma Tre, Roma, Italy

    Isabella Poggi

  3. Department of Computing Science, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom

    Alessandro Vinciarelli

  4. Department of Education Sciences, Università di Macerata, Roma, Italy

    Laura Vincze

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Giardini, F., Conte, R. (2015). Revenge and Conflict: Social and Cognitive Aspects. In: D'Errico, F., Poggi, I., Vinciarelli, A., Vincze, L. (eds) Conflict and Multimodal Communication. Computational Social Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14081-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14081-0_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-14080-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-14081-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation