Structural Equation Modeling for Analyzing the Barriers and Benefits of E-procurement

  • Peral Toktaş-PalutEmail author
  • Ecem Baylav
  • Seyhan Teoman
  • Mustafa Altunbey
Part of the Lecture Notes in Management and Industrial Engineering book series (LNMIE)


We perform an empirical study to analyze whether it would be beneficial for a company to switch from traditional procurement system to e-procurement system. For this purpose, we determine the main barriers and benefits of e-procurement systems, and using Structural Equation Modeling, we analyze the effects of the barriers and benefits on the e-procurement adoption decision. The results denote that barriers (benefits) of e-procurement systems have negative (positive) effect on the adoption decision. We also find that the effect of the benefits is higher than that of the barriers, indicating that it would be beneficial for the company to adopt the e-procurement system.


Barrier Benefit E-procurement Structural equation modeling 


  1. Anderson JC, Gerbing DW (1988) Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol Bull 103(3):411–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Devaraj S, Vaidyanathan G, Mishra AN (2012) Effect of purchase volume flexibility and purchase mix flexibility on e-procurement performance: an analysis of two perspectives. J Oper Manag 30(7–8):509–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Eadie R, Perera S, Heaney G, Carlisle J (2007) Drivers and barriers to public sector e-procurement within Northern Ireland’s construction industry. Electr J Inf Technol Constr 12:103–120Google Scholar
  4. Eei KS, Husain W, Mustaffa N (2012) Survey on benefits and barriers of e-procurement: Malaysian SMEs perspective. Int J Adv Sci Eng Inf Technol 2(6):14–19Google Scholar
  5. Gunasekaran A, McGaughey RE, Ngai EWT, Rai BK (2009) E-procurement adoption in the Southcoast SMEs. Int J Prod Econ 122(1):161–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gunasekaran A, Ngai EWT (2008) Adoption of e-procurement in Hong Kong: an empirical research. Int J Prod Econ 113(1):159–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE (2010) Multivariate data analysis. Pearson Prentice Hall, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  8. Hu L, Bentler PM (1998) Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to unparameterized model misspecification. Psychol Methods 3(4):424–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D (1993) Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Scientific Software, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  10. Kline RB (1998) Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. The Guilford Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Lee W, Quaddus M (2006) Buyer-supplier relationship in the adoption of e-purchasing in the small and medium printing industries in Singapore: an empirical test using structural equation modelling. In: Proceedings of the 10th pacific Asia conference on information systems, pp 337–345Google Scholar
  12. Madeja N, Schoder D (2003) The adoption of e-procurement and its impact on corporate success in electronic business. In: The 3rd international conference on electronic business, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  13. Morris A, Stahl A, Herbert R (2000) E-procurement: streamlining processes to maximize effectiveness. Luminant Worldwide Corporation, USAGoogle Scholar
  14. Panayiotou NA, Gayialis SP, Tatsiopoulos IP (2004) An e-procurement system for governmental purchasing. Int J Prod Econ 90(1):79–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Schermelleh-Engel K, Moosbrugger H, Müller H (2003) Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods Psychol Res Online 8(2):23–74Google Scholar
  16. Vaidyanathan G, Devaraj S (2008) The role of quality in e-procurement performance: an empirical analysis. J Oper Manag 26(3):407–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Warfield JN (1973) Binary matrices in system modeling. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern SMC 3(5):441–449CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peral Toktaş-Palut
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ecem Baylav
    • 2
  • Seyhan Teoman
    • 3
  • Mustafa Altunbey
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Industrial EngineeringDoğuş UniversityIstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.Logistics and Supply Chain Management Doctorate ProgramDoğuş UniversityIstanbulTurkey
  3. 3.Logistics and Supply Chain Management Doctorate ProgramMaltepe UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations