Advertisement

Impact of 5S on Productivity, Quality, Organizational Climate and IS at Tecniaguas S.A.S

  • Paloma Martínez Sánchez
  • Natalia Rincón BallesterosEmail author
  • Diana Fuentes Olaya
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Management and Industrial Engineering book series (LNMIE)

Abstract

This paper describes an approach to assessing the impact of 5S on four study factors: namely quality, productivity, industrial security (IS) and organizational climate (OC) in the manufacturing processes carried out at SMEs in Bogota (Colombia). The approach is illustrated by a case study conducted at a manufacturing SME. The main purpose is to evaluate whether the 5S methodology could be considered as an effective tool to improve manufacturing processes at SMEs. A visual diagnosis is chosen to identify the areas that exhibit the largest amount of clutter and dirt. Once the location is identified, surveys, performance measurements and a risk landscape are conducted, focusing on particular study factors so as to understand the initial situation of the area. Subsequently, implementation of 5S is carried out and then three measurements are taken to monitor the performance of the study factors, thus finding out whether a trend can be observed during the measuring period. The results show the existence of a positive connection between the study factors and the implementation of the 5S methodology, since there is evidence of an increase in productivity (44 %), quality (44 %) and OC (52 %) and a decrease in the risks identified (90 %).

Keywords

5S Productivity Quality Industrial security Organizational climate 

References

  1. AENOR (2000) Upcommons. Recovered 14 Aug 2012, from http://upcommons.upc.edu/pfc/bitstream/2099.1/3042/4/36146-4.pdf
  2. Arrieta JG (1999) Las 5S, pilares de la fábrica visual. Revista Universidad EAFIT, pp 35–48Google Scholar
  3. Becker JE (2001) Implementing 5S: to promote safety and housekeeping. J Prof Saf 46(8):29–31Google Scholar
  4. Castillo L, Lengua C, Pérez P (2011) Caracterización psicométrica de un instrumento de clima organizacional en el sector educativo universitario Colombiano. Int J Psychol Res 4:40–47Google Scholar
  5. Chase R, Jacobs R, Aquilano N (2009) Administración de operaciones: Producción y cadena de suministro, 12th edn. McGraw-Hill/Interamericana Editores S.A, MexicoGoogle Scholar
  6. Cura HM (2003) UCEMA. Recovered 12 Feb 2012, from http://www.ucema.edu.ar/productividad/download/2003/Cura.pdf
  7. Deming E (1989) Calidad, productividad y competitividad: la salida de la crisis. Diaz de Santos S.A, MadridGoogle Scholar
  8. Febrero E (2000) Valor trabajo, un indicador de productividad y competitividad: una aplicación empírica al caso español, 1970–1992‬. Ediciones de la Universidad de Castilla—La Mancha, EspañaGoogle Scholar
  9. Gapp R, Fisher R, Kobayashi K (2008) Implementing 5S within a Japanese context an integrated managemet system. Manage Decis 46(4):565–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ho SK (1999) 5s practice: the first step toward total quality management. Total Qual Manage Bus Excellence 10(3):345–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. HungLing C (2011) 5s implementation in Wang Cheng industry manufacturing factory in Taiwan. Master thesis, Wisconsin University, p 45Google Scholar
  12. Jumar RS, Sudhahar C, Dickson J, Senthil V, Devadasan S (2007) Performance analysis of 5-S teams using quality circle financial accountant system. TQM Magaz 19(5):483–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mateus E (2011) 5S: Un metodo eficaz para el éxito en la organización y productividad empresarial. Metal Actual, pp 82–88Google Scholar
  14. Michalska J, Szewieczek D (2007) The 5S methodology as a tool for improving the organization. J Achievements Mater Manufact Eng 24(2):211–214Google Scholar
  15. Moriones A, Bello A, Merino J (2010) Use 5S in the manufacturing plants: contextual factor and impact on operating performance. Int J Qual Reliab Manage 27(2):217–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Osada T (1991) The 5S: five keys to a total quality environment. Asian Productivity Organization, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  17. Riera A (2010) Universidad Politécnica Salesiana del Ecuador. Recovered 27 Apr 2012, from http://dspace.ups.edu.ec/bitstream/123456789/688/6/CAPITULO%20IV.pdf
  18. Sacristán FR (2005) Las 5´: orden y limpeza en el puesto de trabajo. Fundación Confemetal, EspañaGoogle Scholar
  19. Sánchez R (2007) El proceso de las 5s en acción: La metodología japonesa para mejorar la calidad y la productividad de cualquier tipo de empresa. Gestión y estrategia, p 91Google Scholar
  20. Syverson C (2011) What determinates productivity? J Econ Lit 49(2):326–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tice J, Ahouse L, Larson T (2005) Lean production and EMSs: aligning environmental management with business priorities. Environ Qual Manage 15(2):1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. UMH (2009) Universidad Autónoma Del Estado De México. Retrieved 20 Aug 2012, from http://www.uaemex.mx/planeacion/docs/sgc/Algo%20acerca%20del%20concepto%20de%20calidad.pdf

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paloma Martínez Sánchez
    • 1
  • Natalia Rincón Ballesteros
    • 2
    Email author
  • Diana Fuentes Olaya
    • 2
  1. 1.Facultad de Ingeniería, Programa de Ingeniería IndustrialUniversidad El BosqueBogotáColombia
  2. 2.Grupo Gintecpro. Facultad de Ingeniería, Programa de Ingeniería IndustrialUniversidad El BosqueBogotáColombia

Personalised recommendations