Skip to main content

Increasing Production and Minimizing Costs During Machining by Control of Tool’s Wears and or Damages

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Enhancing Synergies in a Collaborative Environment

Abstract

Industries involved in machining processes need to increase their competitiveness to adequately meet the market demand, i.e. better quality of their final products and a more efficient machining process. There are some industries that prefer to work with the managers of machining tools in order to control the costs of the proceedings. However, the authors of this article have the opinion that it is essential to have professionals hired directly by the company to play the role of improvements introducer to the machining process. So, following this procedure, this paper proposes the use of the Six Sigma methodology to the management and stratification of the consumption and tool breakage during the machining process. Thus, the DMAIC method was used. By providing data collection during research in the areas of factory production, causes of tool breakage were identified. With this information were initiated actions seeking process improvements and also attempting to define new ideal conditions, both of machine tools, as tools. The result showed that it was possible to propose a model for controlling the tool breakage and, undoubtedly, contribute to reducing costs and increasing productivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Antony J, Banuelas R (2002) Key ingredients for the effective implementation of six sigma program. Measur Bus Excellence 6(4):20–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Askin RG, Standridge CR (1993) Modeling and analysis of manufacturing systems. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Breyfogle FW III, Cupello JM, Meadows B (2001) Managing six sigma: a practical guide to understanding, assessing, and implementing the strategy that yields bottom-line success. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho MM (2002) Seleção de Projetos Seis Sigma. In: Rotondaro RG (Org) Seis Sigma: estratégia gerencial para melhoria do processo, produtos e serviços. Atlas, São Paulo

    Google Scholar 

  • Diniz AE, Marcondes FC, Coppini NL (2013) Tecnologia da usinagem dos materiais. Artiliber Editora Ltda, Campinas, SP, Brasil, 8ª Edição, pp 230–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Harry M, Schroeder R (2000) Six sigma: the breakthrough management strategy revolutionizing the world’s top corporations. Currency, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoerl R (2001) Six sigma Blak Belts: what do they need to know? J Qual Technol 33(4), 391–406

    Google Scholar 

  • Klefsjö B, Wiklund N, Edegman RL (2001) Six sigma seen as a methodology for total quality management. Measur Bus Excellence 5(1):31–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mcadam R, Lafferty B (2004) A multilevel case study critique of six sigma: statistical control or strategic change? Int J Oper Prod Manage 24(5):530–549

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohno T (1997) O sistema Toyota de produção: além da produção em larga escala. Bookman, Porto Alegre

    Google Scholar 

  • Pande PS, Neuman R, Cavanagh RR (2000) The six sigma way: how GE, motorola and other top companies are honing their performance. New York, McGraw-Hill

    Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez AM, Pérez MP (2001) Lean indicators and manufacturing strategies. Int J Oper Prod Manage 21(11):1433–1451

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebastiani DJ (2004) Desenvolvimento e Utilização das Máquinas-Ferramenta com Comando Numérico Computadorizado (CNC) Aplicados no SENAI e nas Industrias Metal- Mecânica. Novo Hamburgo, Monografia, Agosto

    Google Scholar 

  • Shingo S (1996) O sistema toyota de produção: do ponto de vista da engenharia de produção, 2nd edn. Porto Alegre, Bookman

    Google Scholar 

  • Snee RD, Rodebaugh WF Jr (2002) The project selection process. Qual Prog 35:78–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu SM, Ermer DS (1966) Maximum profit as the criterion in the determination of the optimum cutting conditions. J Eng Industry Trans ASME 88:435–442

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Nivaldo Lemos Coppini or Ivair Alves dos Santos .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Coppini, N.L., dos Santos, I.A. (2015). Increasing Production and Minimizing Costs During Machining by Control of Tool’s Wears and or Damages. In: Cortés, P., Maeso-González, E., Escudero-Santana, A. (eds) Enhancing Synergies in a Collaborative Environment. Lecture Notes in Management and Industrial Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14078-0_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14078-0_27

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-14077-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-14078-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics