Advertisement

Methodology to Manage Make-to-Order and Make-to-Stock Decisions in an Electronic Component Plant

  • Julien MaheutEmail author
  • David Rey
  • José P. Garcia-Sabater
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Management and Industrial Engineering book series (LNMIE)

Abstract

Supply chain management is a crucial part of any production system, therefore many strategies and concepts have been developed in order to help firms make the most out of their manufacturing capacity and to fulfil the best service level for customers. However, companies still face the problem of supply chain failures. Some of the main strategies to fulfil orders that exist nowadays are make-to-order (MTO), make-to-stock (MTS), assemble-to-order (ATO) or engineer-to-order (ETO) policies. In this paper, we review the literature about methods to help stakeholders to decide if a product has to be MTO or MTS. A case study of a hybrid MTO/MTS system on an electrical component manufacturing plant, that has to consider new decision factors and constraints, is introduced.

Keywords

Make-to-stock Make-to-order Case study 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The research leading to these results has received funding from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation within the Program “Proyectos de Investigación Fundamental No Orientada” through the project “CORSARI MAGIC DPI2010-18243” and from the Project “Path Dependence y toma de decisiones para la selección de herramientas y prácticas de Lean Manufacturing” (PAID-06-12-SP20120717) of the Universitat Politècnica de València.

References

  1. Kerkkänen A (2007) Determining semi-finished products to be stocked when changing the MTS-MTO policy: case of a steel mill. Int J Prod Econ 108:111–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Kingsman B, Hendry L, Mercer A, de Souza A (1996) Responding to customer enquiries in make-to-order companies problems and solutions. Int J Prod Econ 46–47:219–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Li D, O’Brien C (2001) A quantitative analysis of relationships between product types and supply chain strategie. Int J Prod Econ 73:29–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Maheut J, Garcia-Sabater JP, Garcia-Sabater JJ (2013) Integrated production and simulation scheduling tool to solve the mix model assembly line problem considering Heijunka and operational constraints: a case study. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on industrial engineering and industrial management, pp 381–388Google Scholar
  5. Maheut J, Besga JM, Uribetxeberria J, Garcia-Sabater JP (2014) A decision support system for modelling and implementing the supply network configuration and operations scheduling problem in the machine tool industry. Prod Plann Control 25:679–697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Oberlé J (2010) Air sea ratio reduction initiative. In: Proceedings of the World energy congress, pp 1–13Google Scholar
  7. Rajagopalan S (2002) Make to stock or make to stock: model and application. Manage Sci 48:241–256CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Silver EA, Pyke DF, Peterson R (1998) Inventory management and production planning and scheduling, 3rd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Soman CA, van Donk DP, Gaalman G (2004) Combined make-to-order and make-to-stock in a food production sytem. Int J Prod Econ 90:223–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Van Donk DP, Soman CA, Gaalman G (2005) A decision aid for make-to-order and make-to-stock classification in food processing industries. In: Proceedings of the EurOMAGoogle Scholar
  11. Zaerpour N, Rabbani M, Gharehgozli AH, Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R et al (2008) Make-to-order or make-to-stock decision by a novel hybrid approach. Adv Eng Inform 22:186–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julien Maheut
    • 1
    Email author
  • David Rey
    • 1
  • José P. Garcia-Sabater
    • 1
  1. 1.Dpto. de Organización de Empresas, Edificio 7DUniversitat Politecnica de ValenciaValenciaSpain

Personalised recommendations