Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Nano-fertilizers and Their Smart Delivery System

  • Chapter
Book cover Nanotechnologies in Food and Agriculture

Abstract

Outburst of world population in the past decade has forced the agricultural sector to increase crop productivity to satisfy the needs of billions of people especially in developing countries. Widespread existence of nutrient deficiency in soils has resulted in great economic loss for farmers and significant decreases in nutritional quality and overall quantity of grains for human beings and livestock. Use of large-scale application of chemical fertilizers to increase the crop productivity is not a suitable option for long run because the chemical fertilizers are considered as double-edged swords, which on the one hand increase the crop production but on the other hand disturb the soil mineral balance and decrease soil fertility. Large-scale application of chemical fertilizers results in an irreparable damage to the soil structure, mineral cycles, soil microbial flora, plants, and even more on the food chains across ecosystems leading to heritable mutations in future generations of consumers.

In recent years, nanotechnology has extended its relevance in plant science and agriculture. Advancement in nanotechnology has improved ways for large-scale production of nanoparticles of physiologically important metals, which are now used to improve fertilizer formulations for increased uptake in plant cells and by minimizing nutrient loss. Nanoparticles have high surface area, sorption capacity, and controlled-release kinetics to targeted sites making them “smart delivery system.” Nanostructured fertilizers can increase the nutrient use efficiency through mechanisms such as targeted delivery, slow or controlled release. They could precisely release their active ingredients in responding to environmental triggers and biological demands. In recent lab scale investigations, it has been reported that nano-fertilizers can improve crop productivity by enhancing the rate of seed germination, seedling growth, photosynthetic activity, nitrogen metabolism, and carbohydrate and protein synthesis. However, as being an infant technology, the ethical and safety issues surrounding the use of nanoparticles in plant productivity are limitless and must be very carefully evaluated before adapting the use of the so-called nano-fertilizers in agricultural fields.

In this chapter, we emphasize on the formulation and delivery of nano-fertilizers, their uptake, translocation, and fate in plants as well as their effect on plant physiology and metabolism. Ethical and safety issues regarding the use of nanotechnology in agriculture are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arora S, Sharma P, Kumar S, Nayan R, Khanna PK, Zaidi MGH (2012) Gold-nanoparticle induced enhancement in growth and seed yield of Brassica juncea. Plant Growth Regul 66:303–310

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barber SA (1995) Soil nutrient bioavailability: a mechanistic approach, 2nd edn. Wiley-Blackwell, New Jersey, 384 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrena R, Casals E, Colon J, Font X, Sanchez A, Puntes V (2009) Evaluation of the ecotoxicity of model nanoparticles. Chemosphere 75:850–857

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boehm AL, Martinon I, Zerrouk R, Rump E, Fessi H (2003) Nanoprecipitation technique for the encapsulation of agrochemical active ingredients. J Microencapsul 20:433–441

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Borm PJA, Robbins D, Haubold S, Kuhlbusch T, Fissan H, Donaldson K, Schins R, Stone V, Kreyling W, Lademann J, Krutmann J, Warheit D, Oberdörster E (2006) The potential risks of nanomaterials: a review carried out for ECETOC. Part Fibre Toxicol 3:11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouwmeester H, Dekkers S, Noordam MY, Hagens WI, Bulder AS, de Heer C, ten Voorde SE, Wijnhoven SW, Marvin HJ, Sips AJ (2009) Review of health safety aspects of nanotechnologies in food production. Regul Toxicol Pharm 53:52–62

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brady NR, Weil RR (1999) In: Brady NR, Weil RR (eds) The nature and properties of soils. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, pp 415–473

    Google Scholar 

  • Burman U, Saini M, Kumar P (2013) Effect of zinc oxide nanoparticles on growth and antioxidant system of chickpea seedlings. Toxicol Environ Chem 95:605–616

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhry Q, Castle L (2011) Food applications of nanotechnologies: an overview of opportunities and challenges for developing countries. Trends Food Sci Technol 22:595–603

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chinnamuthu CR, Boopati PM (2009) Nanotechnology and agroecosystem. Madras Agric J 96:17–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Colvin VL (2003) The potential environmental impact of engineered nanomaterials. Nat Biotechnol 21:1166–1170

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Comerford NB (2005) Soil factors affecting nutrient bioavailability ecological studies. In: BassiriRad H (ed) Nutrient acquisition by plants an ecological perspective. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Corradini E, De Moura MR, Mattoso LHC (2010) A preliminary study of the incorporation of NPK fertilizer into chitosan nanoparticles. Express Polym Lett 4:509–515

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Corredor E, Testillano PS, Coronado MJ, González-Melendi P, Fernández-Pacheco R, Marquina C, Ibarra MR, de la Fuente JM, Rubiales D, Pérez-de-Luque A, Risueño MC (2009) Nanoparticle penetration and transport in living pumpkin plants: in situ subcellular identification. BMC Plant Biol 9:45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui HX, Sun CJ, Liu Q, Jiang J, Gu W (2010) Applications of nanotechnology in agrochemical formulation, perspectives, challenges and strategies. In: International conference on Nanoagri, Sao Pedro, Brazil, pp 28–33

    Google Scholar 

  • DeRosa MC, Monreal C, Schnitzer M, Walsh R, Sultan Y (2010) Nanotechnology in fertilizers. Nat Nanotechnol 5:91

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dhawan A, Sharma V, Parmar D (2009) Nanomaterials: a challenge for toxicologists. Nanotoxicology 3:1–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • EFSA Scientific Committee (2011) Guidance on the risk assessment of the application of nanoscience and nanotechnologies in the food and feed chain. EFSA J 9:2140–2176

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichert T, Kurtz A, Steiner U, Goldbach HE (2008) Size exclusion limits and lateral heterogeneity of the stomatal foliar uptake pathway for aqueous solutes and water‐suspended nanoparticles. Physiol Plant 134:151–160

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández V, Eichert T (2009) Uptake of hydrophilic solutes through plant leaves: current state of knowledge and perspectives of foliar fertilization. Crit Rev Plant Sci 28:36–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleischer A, O’Neill MA, Ehwald R (1999) The pore size of non-graminaceous plant cell walls is rapidly decreased by borate ester cross-linking of the pectic polysaccharide rhamnogalacturonan II. Plant Physiol 121:829–838

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gao F, Hong F, Liu C, Zhang L, Su M, Wu X, Yang F, Wu C, Yang P (2006) Mechanism of nano-anatase TiO2 on promoting photosynthetic carbon reaction of spinach. Biol Trace Elem Res 111:239–253

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gericke WF (1937) Hydroponics – crop production in liquid culture media. Science 85:177–178

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ghormade V, Deshpande MV, Paknikar KM (2011) Perspectives for nano-biotechnology enabled protection and nutrition of plants. Biotechnol Adv 29:792–803

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Green JM, Beestman GB (2007) Recently patented and commercialized formulation and adjuvant technology. Crop Prot 26:320–327

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heffer P, Prud’homme M (2012) Fertilizer outlook 2012–2016. Paper presented at the 80th IFA annual conference, 21–23 May, Doha (Qatar)

    Google Scholar 

  • Khodakovskaya M, Dervishi E, Mahmood M, Xu Y, Li Z, Watanbe F, Biris AS (2009) Carbon nanotubes are able to penetrate plant seed coat and dramatically affect seed germination and plant growth. ACS Nano 3:3221–3227

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khodakovskaya M, Silva KD, Biris AS, Dervishi E, Villagarica H (2012) Carbon nanotubes induce growth enhancement in tobacco cells. ACS Nano 6:2128–2135

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kottegoda N, Munaweera I, Madusanka N, Karunaratne V (2011) A green slow-release fertilizer composition based on urea-modified hydroxyapatite nanoparticles encapsulated wood. Curr Sci 101:73–78

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kurepa J, Paunesku T, Vogt S, Arora H, Rabatic BM, Lu J, Wanzer MB, Woloschak GE, Smalle JA (2010) Uptake and distribution of ultrasmall anatase TiO2 Alizarin red S nanoconjugates in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nano Lett 10:2296–2302

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Larue C, Khodja H, Herlin-Boime N, Brisset F, Flank AM, Fayard B, Chaillou S, Carrière M (2011) Investigation of titanium dioxide nanoparticles toxicity and uptake by plants. J Phys: Conf Ser 304:012057

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee W, An YJ, Yoon H, Kweon HS (2008) Toxicity and bioavailability of copper nanoparticles to the terrestrial plants mung bean (Phaseolus radiatus) and wheat (Triticum aestivum): plant agar test for water-insoluble nanoparticles. Environ Toxicol Chem 27:1915–1921

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lei Z, Mingyu S, Chao L, Liang C, Hao H, Xiao W, Xiaoqing L, Fan Y, Fengqing G, Fashui H (2007) Effects of nanoanatase TiO2 on photosynthesis of spinach chloroplasts under different light illumination. Biol Trace Elem Res 119:68–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin D, Xing B (2007) Phytotoxicity of nanoparticles: inhibition of seed germination and root growth. Environ Pollut 150:243–250

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lin D, Xing B (2008) Root uptake and phytotoxicity of ZnO nanoparticles. Environ Sci Technol 42:5580–5585

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Loomis RS, Connor DJ (1992) Crop ecology: productivity and management in agricultural systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 538 pp

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • López-Moreno ML, de la Rosa G, Hernández-Viezcas JA, Castillo-Michel H, Botez CE, Peralta-Videa JR, Gardea-Torresdey JL (2010) Evidence of the differential biotransformation and genotoxicity of ZnO and CeO2 nanoparticles on soybean (Glycine max) plants. Environ Sci Technol 44:7315–7320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu CM, Zhang CY, Wu JQ, Tao MX (2002) Research of the effect of nanometer on germination and growth enhancement of Glycine max and its mechanism. Soybean Sci 21:168–172

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mahajan P, Dhoke SK, Khanna AS (2011) Effect of nano-ZnO particle suspension on growth of mung (Vigna radiata) and gram (Cicer arietinum) seedlings using plant agar method. J Nanotechnol 2011:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmoodzadeh H, Nabavi M, Kashefi H (2013) Effect of nanoscale titanium dioxide particles on the germination and growth of canola (Brassica napus). J Ornam Hortic Plants 3:25–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Marschner H (1995) Mineral nutrition of higher plants, 2nd edn. Academic Press Inc., New York, 889 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Meng H, Xia T, George S, Nel AE (2009) A predictive toxicological paradigm for the safety assessment of nanomaterials. ACS Nano 3:1620–1627

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mengel K, Kirkby EA (2001) Principles of plant nutrition, 5th edn. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 849 pp

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Milani N, McLaughlin MJ, Stacey SP, Kirkby JK, Hettiarachchi GM, Beak DG, Cornelis G (2012) Dissolution kinetics of macronutrient fertilizers coated with manufactured zinc oxide nanoparticles. J Agric Food Chem 60:3991–3998

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miransari M (2011) Soil microbes and plant fertilization. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 92:875–885

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mondal A, Basu R, Das S, Nandy P (2011) Beneficial role of carbon nanotubes on mustard plant growth: an agricultural prospect. J Nanopart Res 13:4519–4528

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moore M (2006) Do nanoparticles present ecotoxicological risks for the health of the aquatic environment? Environ Int 32:967–976

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Naderi MR, Danesh-Shahraki A (2013) Nanofertilizers and their role in sustainable agriculture. Int J Agric Crop Sci 5:2229–2232

    Google Scholar 

  • Nair R, Varghese SH, Nair BG, Maekawa T, Yoshida Y, Kumar DS (2010) Nanoparticulate material delivery to plants. Plant Sci 179:154–163

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Namasivayam SKR, Chitrakala K (2011) Ecotoxicological effect of Lecanicillium lecanii (Ascomycota: Hypocreales) based silver nanoparticles on growth parameters of economically important plants. J Biopest 4:97–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Nanoscale Science Energy and Technology Subcommittee (2007) The national nanotechnology initiative strategic plan. National Science and Technology Council

    Google Scholar 

  • Navarro E, Baun A, Behra R, Hartmann NB, Filser J, Miao AJ, Quigg A, Santschi PH, Sigg L (2008) Environmental behavior and ecotoxicity of engineered nanoparticles to algae, plants, and fungi. Ecotoxicology 17:372–386

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nel A, Xia T, Mädler L, Li N (2006) Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel. Science 311:622–627

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oberdörster G, Oberdörster E, Oberdörster J (2005) Nanotoxicology: an emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles. Environ Health Perspect 113:823–839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ombódi A, Saigusa M (2000) Broadcast application versus band application of polyolefin‐coated fertilizer on green peppers grown on andisol. J Plant Nutr 23:1485–1493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad TNVKV, Sudhakar P, Sreenivasulu Y, Latha P, Munaswamy V, Reddy KR, Sreeprasad TS, Sajanlal PR, Pradeep T (2012) Effect of nanoscale zinc oxide particles on the germination, growth and yield of peanut. J Plant Nutr 35:905–927

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Quoc Buu N, Trong Hien D, Hoai Chau N, Xuan Tin T, Tuong Van N, Thuy Duong K, Thi Ha H (2014) Effects of nanocrystalline powders (Fe, Co and Cu) on the germination, growth, crop yield and product quality of soybean (Vietnamese species DT-51). Adv Nat Sci: Nano Nanotechnol 5:015016

    Google Scholar 

  • Rico CM, Majumdar S, Duarte-Gardea M, Peralta-Videa JR, Gardea-Torresdey JL (2011) Interaction of nanoparticles with edible plants and their possible implications in the food chain. J Agric Food Chem 59:3485–3498

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sahandi SM, Sorooshzadeh A, Rezazadeh HS, Naghdibadi HA (2011) Effect of nanosilver and silver nitrate on seed yield of borage. J Med Plants Res 5:706–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sasson Y, Levy-Ruso G, Toledano O, Ishaaya I (2007) Nanosuspensions: emerging novel agrochemical formulations. In: Ishaaya I, Horowitz AR, Nauen R (eds) Insecticides design using advanced technologies. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–39

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schulte PA, Salamanca-Buentello F (2007) Ethical and scientific issues of nanotechnology in the workplace. Environ Health Perspect 115:5–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah V, Belozerova I (2009) Influence of metal nanoparticles on the soil microbial community and germination of lettuce seeds. Water Air Soil Pollut 197:143–148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sun D, Hussain H, Yi Z, Siegele R, Cresswell T, Kong L, Cahill D (2014) Uptake and cellular distribution, in four plant species, of fluorescently labeled mesoporous silica nanoparticles. Plant Cell Rep 33:1389–1402

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Suriyaprabha R, Karunakaran G, Yuvakkumar R, Prabu P, Rajendran V, Kannan N (2012) Growth and physiological responses of maize (Zea mays L.) to porous silica nanoparticles in soil. J Nanopart Res 14:1294–1308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taiz L, Zeiger E (2010) Plant physiology, 5th edn. Sinauer Associates Inc., Massachusetts, 781 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Thakkar MN, Mhatre S, Parikh RY (2010) Biological synthesis of metallic nanoparticles. Nanotechol Biol Med 6:257–262

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas K, Sayre P (2005) Research strategies for safety evaluation of nanomaterials, Part I: evaluating the human health implications of exposure to nanoscale materials. Toxicol Sci 87:316–321

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D, Knops J, Wedin D, Reich P (2002) Plant diversity and composition: effects on productivity and nutrient dynamics of experimental grasslands. In: Loreau M, Naeem S, Inchausti P (eds) Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 21–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Torney F, Trewyn BG, Lin VS-Y, Wang K (2007) Mesoporous silica nanoparticles deliver DNA and chemicals into plants. Nat Nanotechnol 2:295–300

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trenkel ME (1997) Controlled-release and stabilized fertilizers in agriculture. International Fertilizer Industry Association, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsuji K (2001) Microencapsulation of pesticides and their improved handling safety. J Microencapsul 18:137–147

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Uzu G, Sobanska S, Sarret G, Munoz M, Dumat C (2010) Foliar lead uptake by lettuce exposed to atmospheric fallouts. Environ Sci Technol 44:1036–1042

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Kou X, Pei Z, Xiao JQ, Shan X, Xing B (2011) Physiological effects of magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles on perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) and pumpkin (Cucurbita mixta) plants. Nanotoxicology 5:30–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wanyika H, Gatebe E, Kioni P, Tang Z, Gao Y (2012) Mesoporous silica nanoparticles carrier for urea: potential applications in agrochemical delivery systems. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 12:2221–2228

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weathers PJ, Zobel RW (1992) Aeroponics for the culture of organisms, tissues and cells. Biotechnol Adv 10:93–115

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xia T, Li N, Nel AE (2009) Potential health impact of nanoparticles. Annu Rev Public Health 30:137–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao L, Peralta-Videa JR, Rico CM, Hernandez-Viezcas JA, Sun Y, Niu G, Servin A, Nunez JE, Duarte-Gardea M, Gardea-Torresdey JL (2014) CeO2 and ZnO nanoparticles change the nutritional qualities of cucumber (Cucumis sativus). J Agric Food Chem 62:2752–2759

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng L, Hong F, Lu S, Liu C (2005) Effect of nano-TiO2 on strength of naturally aged seeds and growth of spinach. Biol Trace Elem Res 104:83–92

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu H, Han J, Xiao JQ, Jin Y (2008) Uptake, translocation, and accumulation of manufactured iron oxide nanoparticles by pumpkin plants. J Environ Monit 10:713–717

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biological Sciences, Centre for Biotechnology, Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani, 333031, India

    Priyanka Solanki, Arpit Bhargava, Hemraj Chhipa, Navin Jain & Jitendra Panwar

Authors
  1. Priyanka Solanki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Arpit Bhargava
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hemraj Chhipa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Navin Jain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jitendra Panwar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jitendra Panwar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biotechnology, SGB Amravati University, Amravati, Maharashtra, India

    Mahendra Rai

  2. Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation-Instrumentation, Embrapa Instrumentation, Sao Carlos, Brazil

    Caue Ribeiro

  3. Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation-Instrumentation, Embrapa Instrumentation, Sao Carlos, Brazil

    Luiz Mattoso

  4. Institute of Chemistry Biological Chemistry Laboratory, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, Brazil

    Nelson Duran

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Solanki, P., Bhargava, A., Chhipa, H., Jain, N., Panwar, J. (2015). Nano-fertilizers and Their Smart Delivery System. In: Rai, M., Ribeiro, C., Mattoso, L., Duran, N. (eds) Nanotechnologies in Food and Agriculture. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14024-7_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation