Skip to main content

How Does Innovativeness Foster Sustainable Supply Chain Management?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Measuring Operations Performance ((MEOP))

Abstract

Innovativeness refers to an organization’s willingness/ability to change through architectural/radical innovation of processes, products and management systems. Existing literature generally supports the importance of innovativeness for environmental and social sustainability. Open questions, however, still remain: (i) which mechanisms (i.e., tools and routines) do innovative firms leverage that better assist the process through which stakeholder pressure is turned into sustainability strategy? (ii) Which mechanisms do innovative firms leverage that better assist the process through which strategy is turned into a successful adoption of sustainable supply chain management (SSCM) practices? To advance our understanding of how innovativeness fosters SSCM, we leveraged a continuous process of theory generation and data collection through case studies. A set of propositions and a conceptual model were built that complement prior research and can provide guidance to firms that struggle with how to deliver new environmental and social standards in their supply chains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ageron B, Gunasekaran A, Spalanzani A (2012) Sustainable supply management: an empirical study. Int J Prod Econ 140:168–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahi P, Searcy C (2013) A comparative literature analysis of definitions for green and sustainable supply chain management. J Cleaner Prod 52:329–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashford NA, Hall RP, Ashford RH (2012) The crisis in employment and consumer demand: reconciliation with environmental sustainability. Environ Innov Societal Transitions 2:1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ateş MA, Bloemhof J, van Raaij EM, Wynstra F (2011) Proactive environmental strategy in a supply chain context: the mediating role of investments. Int J Prod Res 50:1079–1095

    Google Scholar 

  • Awaysheh A, Klassen RD (2010) The impact of supply chain structure on the use of supplier socially responsible practices. Int J Oper Prod Manage 30:1246–1268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal P, Roth K (2000) Why companies go green: a model of ecological responsiveness. Acad Manage J 43:717–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baylis R, Connell L, Flynn A (1998) Company size, environmental regulation and ecological modernization: further analysis at the level of the firm. Bus Strateg Environ 7:285–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bocken NMP, Short SW, Rana P, Evans S (2014) A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. J Cleaner Prod 65:42–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bos-Brouwers HEJ (2010) Corporate sustainability and innovation in SMEs: evidence of themes and activities in practice. Bus Strateg Environ 19:417–435

    Google Scholar 

  • Calantone RJ, Cavusgil ST, Zhao Y (2002) Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance. Ind Mark Manage 31:515–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll AB (1999) Corporate social responsibility. Bus Soc 38:268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter CR, Jennings MM (2004) The role of purchasing in corporate social responsibility: a structural equation analysis. J Bus Logistics 25:145–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang SJ, Choi U (1988) Strategy, structure and performance of Korean business groups: a transactions cost approach. J Ind Econ 37:141–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christmann P (2000) Effects of “best practices” of environmental management on cost advantage: the role of complementary assets. Acad Manage J 43:663–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christmann P (2004) Multinational companies and the natural environment: determinants of global environmental policy standardization. Acad Manage J 47:747–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daily BF, Huang S (2001) Achieving sustainability through attention to human resource factors in environmental management. Int J Oper Prod Manage 21:1539–1552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darnall N, Jolley GJ, Handfield R (2008) Environmental management systems and green supply chain management: complements for sustainability? Bus Strateg Environ 17:30–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrgott M, Reimann F, Kaufmann L, Carter CR (2011) Social sustainability in selecting emerging economy suppliers. J Bus Ethics 98:99–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt KM, Graebner ME (2007) Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges. Acad Manage J Arch 50:25–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt KM, Martin JA (2000) Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strateg Manage J 21:1105–1121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia R, Calantone R (2002) A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: a literature review. J Prod Innov Manage 19:110–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González-Benito J, González-Benito Ó (2006) A review of determinant factors of environmental proactivity. Bus Strateg Environ 15:87–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gualandris J, Golini R, Kalchschmidt M (2014) Do supply management and global sourcing matter for firm sustainability performance? An international study. Supply Chain Manage Int J 19:258–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gualandris J, Kalchschmidt M (2014) Customer pressure and innovativeness: their role in sustainable supply chain management. J Purchasing Supply Manage 20:92–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halila F (2007) Networks as a means of supporting the adoption of organizational innovations in SMEs: the case of environmental management systems (EMSs) based on ISO 14001. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manage 14:167–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handfield RB, Walton SV, Seegers LK, Melnyk SA (1997) ‘Green’value chain practices in the furniture industry. J Oper Manage 15:293–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herring H, Sorrell S (2009) Energy efficiency and sustainable consumption: the rebound effect. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke

    Google Scholar 

  • Holcomb TR, Hitt MA (2007) Toward a model of strategic outsourcing. J Oper Manage 25:464–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hult GTM, Ketchen DJ (2003) Organizational learning as a strategic resource in supply management. J Oper Manage 21:541–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isaksson R, Johansson P, Fischer K (2010) Detecting supply chain innovation potential for sustainable development. J Bus Ethics 97:425–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkman BL, Lowe KB, Gibson CB (2006) A quarter century of culture’s consequences: a review of empirical research incorporating Hofstede’s cultural values framework. J Int Bus Stud 37:285–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klassen RD (2001) Plant-level environmental management orientation: the influence of management view and plant characteristics. Prod Oper Manage 10:257–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klassen RD, Vachon S (2003) Collaboration and evaluation in the supply chain: the impact on plant-level environmental investment. Prod Oper Manage 12:336–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klassen RD, Vereecke A (2012) Social issues in supply chains: capabilities link responsibility, risk (opportunity), and performance. Int J Prod Econ 140:103–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krause DR, Vachon S, Klassen RD (2009) Special topic forum on sustainable supply chain management: introduction and reflections on the role of purchasing management. J Supply Chain Manag 45:18–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee SY, Klassen RD (2009) Drivers and enablers that foster environmental management capabilities in small-and medium-sized suppliers in supply chains. Prod Oper Manage 17:573–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee SY, Rhee SK (2007) The change in corporate environmental strategies: a longitudinal empirical study. Manage Decis 45:196–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longoni A (2014) HRM and organisational practices in operations: the impact on environmental and social sustainability, sustainable operations strategies. Springer, New York, pp 13–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Maignan I, Hillebrand B, McAlister D (2002) Managing socially-responsible buying: how to integrate non-economic criteria into the purchasing process. Eur Manage J 20:641–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murillo-Luna JL, Garcés-Ayerbe C, Rivera-Torres P (2008) Why do patterns of environmental response differ? A stakeholders’ pressure approach. Strateg Manage J 29:1225–1240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nidumolu R, Prahalad CK, Rangaswami M (2009) Why sustainability is now the key driver of innovation. Harvard Bus Rev 87:56–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagell M, Gobeli D (2009) How plant managers’ experiences and attitudes toward sustainability relate to operational performance. Prod Oper Manage 18:278–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pagell M, Johnston D, Veltri A, Klassen R, Biehl M (2013) Is safe production an oxymoron? Prod Oper Manage 23:1161–1175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pagell M, Shevchenko A (2014) Why research in sustainable supply chain management should have no future. J Supply Chain Manage 50:44–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pagell M, Wu Z (2009) Building a more complete theory of sustainable supply chain management using case studies of 10 exemplars. J Supply Chain Manage 45:37–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parmigiani A, Klassen RD, Russo MV (2011) Efficiency meets accountability: performance implications of supply chain configuration, control, and capabilities. J Oper Manage 29:212–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME, Van der Linde C (1995) Green and competitive: ending the stalemate. Harvard Bus Rev 73:120–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuter C, Foerstl K, Hartmann E, Blome C (2010) Sustainable global supplier management: the role of dynamic capabilities in achieving competitive advantage. J Supply Chain Manage 46:45–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robson LS, Clarke JA, Cullen K, Bielecky A, Severin C, Bigelow PL, Irvin E, Culyer A, Mahood Q (2007) The effectiveness of occupational health and safety management system interventions: a systematic review. Saf Sci 45:329–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohrbeck R, Gemünden HG (2011) Corporate foresight: its three roles in enhancing the innovation capacity of a firm. Technol Forecast Soc Change 78:231–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruff F (2006) Corporate foresight: integrating the future business environment into innovation and strategy. Int J Technol Manage 34:278–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger S, Wagner M (2011) Sustainable entrepreneurship and sustainability innovation: categories and interactions. Bus Strateg Environ 20:222–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter JA (1934) The theory of economic development: an inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Transaction Publishers, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Seuring S, Muller M (2008) From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. J Cleaner Prod 16:1699–1710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma S, Henriques I (2005) Stakeholder influences on sustainability practices in the Canadian forest products industry. Strateg Manage J 26:159–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinkula JM, Baker WE, Noordewier T (1997) A framework for market-based organizational learning: linking values, knowledge, and behavior. J Acad Mark Sci 25:305–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuart I, McCutcheon D, Handfield R, McLachlin R, Samson D (2002) Effective case research in operations management: a process perspective. J Oper Manage 20:419–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nation Global Compact and Business for Social Responsibility (2010) Supply chain sustainability. A practical guide for continuos improvement. UN Global Compact Office

    Google Scholar 

  • van Bommel HWM (2011) A conceptual framework for analyzing sustainability strategies in industrial supply networks from an innovation perspective. J Cleaner Prod 19:895–904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Tulder R, van Wijk J, Kolk A (2009) From chain liability to chain responsibility. J Bus Ethics 85:399–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verona G (1999) A resource-based view of product development. Acad Manage Rev 24:132–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker H, Di Sisto L, McBain D (2008) Drivers and barriers to environmental supply chain management practices: lessons from the public and private sectors. J Purchasing Supply Manage 14:69–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Z, Pagell M (2011) Balancing priorities: decision-making in sustainable supply chain management. J Oper Manage 29:577–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin RK (2009) Case study research: design and methods. Sage Publications, Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Zairi M, Peters J (2002) The impact of social responsibility on business performance. Manag Auditing J 17:174–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Q, Sarkis J (2004) Relationships between operational practices and performance among early adopters of green supply chain management practices in Chinese manufacturing enterprises. J Oper Manage 22:265–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Q, Sarkis J, Geng Y (2005) Green supply chain management in China: pressures, practices and performance. Int J Oper Prod Manage 25:449–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Q, Sarkis J, Lai K (2007) Green supply chain management: pressures, practices and performance within the Chinese automobile industry. J Cleaner Prod 15:1041–1052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Q, Sarkis J, Lai K (2012) Examining the effects of green supply chain management practices and their mediations on performance improvements. Int J Prod Res 50:1377–1394

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jury Gualandris .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gualandris, J., Kalchschmidt, M. (2015). How Does Innovativeness Foster Sustainable Supply Chain Management?. In: Chiarini, A. (eds) Sustainable Operations Management. Measuring Operations Performance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14002-5_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics