Skip to main content

Sustaining IT Usefulness – Re-defining End Users’ Role as Contextual Designers

  • Conference paper
  • 602 Accesses

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 447))

Abstract

A framework for understanding and interpreting IT usefulness and fitness attributes is presented. This framework is grounded on a relationship that exists between organisms and their landscape. The concept draws on the notion that sustainable relationship between two systems (such as IT and end-users) can be achieved through structural coupling results from mutual perpetuations. In this setting, while contextual usefulness is established in the end-users’ environment, IT designers perpetuate fitness into the conceptual environment. Their relationship suggests that usefulness feeds essential input that enables to create a sustainable fitness attribute. Based on the empirical evidence, the paper demonstrates that end-users are better equipped with defining contextual usefulness of IT systems while IT designers’ role to create fitness attribute enables a long-term use of IT artifacts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Hovorka, D., Germonprez, M.: Tinkering, tailoring and bricolage: Implications for theories of design. In: Proceedings of the 15th Americas Conference on Information Systems (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hevner, A.R., et al.: Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly 28(1), 75–105 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. March, S.T., Storey, V.C.: Design science in the information systems discipline: an introduction to the special issue on design science research. MIS Quarterly 32(4), 725–730 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Peffers, K., et al.: A design science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems 24(3), 45–77 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gill, T.G., Hevner, A.R.: A fitness-utility model for design science research. In: Jain, H., Sinha, A.P., Vitharana, P. (eds.) DESRIST 2011. LNCS, vol. 6629, pp. 237–252. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Delone, W.H.: The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems 19(4), 9–30 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Truex, D.P., Baskerville, R., Klein, H.: Growing systems in emergent organizations. Commun. ACM 42(8), 117–123 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Weick, K.E., Sutcliffe, K.M., Obstfeld, D.: Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science 16(4), 409–421 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mendoza, A., Carroll, J., Stern, L.: Adoption, adaption, stabilization and stagnation: software appropriation over time. In: ACIS 2005. University of Technology, Sydney (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tyre, M.J., Orlikowski, W.J.: Windows of opportunity: Temporal patterns of technological adaptation in organizations. Organization Science 5(1), 98–118 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Carroll, J., et al.: A field study of perceptions and use of mobile telephones by 16 to 22 year olds. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application (JITTA) 4(2), 6 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Descartes, R.: The philosophical writings of Descartes, vol. 2. Cambridge University Press (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stefanou, C.J.: A framework for the ex-ante evaluation of ERP software. European Journal of Information Systems 10(4), 204–215 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Maturana, H.R., Guiloff, G.D.: The quest for the intelligence of intelligence. Journal of Social and Biological Structures, 1980 3(2), 135–148 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Quick, T., et al.: The essence of embodiment: A framework for understanding and exploiting structural coupling between system and environment. In: AIP Conference Proceedings (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Winograd, T.A., Flores, C.F.: Understanding computers and cognition: A new foundation for design. Ablex Pub (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lee, J.S., Pries-Heje, J., Baskerville, R.: Theorizing in design science research. In: Jain, H., Sinha, A.P., Vitharana, P. (eds.) DESRIST 2011. LNCS, vol. 6629, pp. 1–16. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Riemer, K., Johnston, R.B.: Place-making: A Phenomenological Theory of Technology Appropriation (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Klein, H.K., Truex, D.P.: Discourse analysis: a semiotic approach to the investigation of organizational emergence. The Semiotics of the Workplace (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Iivari, J., Hirschheim, R., Klein, H.K.: A paradigmatic analysis contrasting information systems development approaches and methodologies. Information Systems Research 9(2), 164–193 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. DeSanctis, G., Poole, M.S.: Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory. Organization Science 5(2), 121–147 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Orlikowski, W.J.: Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Resources, co-evolution and artifacts, pp. 255–305 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Orlikowski, W.J.: Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies 28(9), 1435–1448 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Leonardi, P.: When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: Affordance, constraint, and the imbrication of human and material agencies. MIS Quarterly 35(1), 147–167 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Germonprez, et.al.: Secondary design: A case of behavioral design science research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Winograd, T., Flores, F.: Understanding computers and cognition: A new foundation for design. Ablex Pub (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Schön, D.A.: The reflective practitioner, vol. 1. Basic books (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Rittel, H.W.: The reasoning of designers. IGP (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Truex, D., Baskerville, R., Travis, J.: Amethodical systems development: the deferred meaning of systems development methods. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies 10(1), 53–79 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lakew, N. (2014). Sustaining IT Usefulness – Re-defining End Users’ Role as Contextual Designers. In: Helfert, M., Donnellan, B., Kenneally, J. (eds) Design Science: Perspectives from Europe. EDSS 2013. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 447. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13936-4_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13936-4_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-13935-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-13936-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics