Skip to main content

Medicolegal Issues in Labor Analgesia

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1552 Accesses

Abstract

Within surgical disciplines, obstetrics and anesthesia carry a greater risk of medicolegal liability although with improved monitoring and practice standards issued by national scientific societies such as the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) and the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA). Pain relief is becoming an area of concern. Analgesia refers to the relief of pain without the loss of consciousness. Modalities of analgesia during childbirth include regional analgesia, systemic opioid analgesia, continuous labor support, pudendal blocks, immersion in water during the first stage of labor, sterile water injections in the lumbosacral spine, hypnosis, and acupuncture [1]. Even though there are multiple options for labor pain management, women often experience pain during childbirth in accordance with their expectations. The ASA Closed Claims database [2] has shown that since the1990s the proportion of claims associated with general anesthesia has progressively declined while the proportion associated with regional analgesia has steadily increased although the majority of maternal injuries are minor (e.g., headache, back pain, pain during analgesia, neuropsychological consequences). In addition, [3] it reported that postnatal depression may be more common when analgesia is not used and pain during labor has been correlated with the development of posttraumatic stress disorder. Furthermore, men are also affected by severe labor pain. A survey of first-time fathers showed that the men whose partners received an epidural felt three times as helpful and involved during labor and delivery and had less anxiety and stress, as compared with men whose partners did not receive an epidural [3]. All these situations may reflect unrealistic expectations and dissatisfaction with parturient care, and litigation serves the purpose not only of reparation of injury and deterrence of standard of care but also of emotional vindication. This is especially true in Italy where labor analgesia is becoming an important public health issue with its introduction free of charge in SSN as LEA (Essential Levels of Assistance) (DPCM April 23, 2008, art. 37) but, at the same time, it is not performed in all hospitals [4] due to lack of funding. The problem is clear. Labor analgesia has to be considered an important aspect of the obstetric anesthesia practice, and the provision of adequate pain relief and management has foundation in the law of negligence. The law of medical negligence emphasizes taking reasonable care in all aspects of patient management and, with respect to this particular issue, doctors (the anesthetist as well as the obstetrician, midwife, neonatologist, and labor and delivery nurses) may breach their standard of care by failing to exchange information with the parturient and also with other members of the woman’s family as well as with the obstetric team; by failing to provide appropriate prenatal education and to acquire informed consent; by treating the pain inadequately or by failing to counteract adverse reaction and eventually perform acute resuscitation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In the Italian criminal code, the negligent injury is described as “an event that, even if it happened against the intention, occurred due to negligence, imprudence, unskillfulness or failure to comply with laws, regulations, orders and disciplines” (art. 43, Italian Criminal Code).

  2. 2.

    Legge di conversione 8 novembre 2012, n. 189 e pubblicato in Gazzetta Ufficiale 10 novembre 2012, n. 263.

References

  1. Schrock SD, Harraway-Smith C (2012) Labor analgesia. Am Fam Physician 85(5):447–454

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chadwick HS (2005) Obstetrics anesthesia. Minerva Anestesiologica 71:483–486

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hawkins JL (2010) Epidural analgesia for labor and delivery. N Engl J Med 362:1503–1510

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. AROI Guideline. http://www.aaroiemac.it/site/Allegati/documenti/doc_utili/doc_utili_2008/tra_taglio_cesareo_e_partoanalgesia.pdf. Accessed 28 Sept 2014

  5. Pattee C, Ballantyne M, Milne B (1997) Epidural analgesia for labor and delivery: informed consent issues. Can J Anaesth 44:918–923

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Knapp RM (1990) Legal view of informed consent for anesthesia during labor. Anesthesiology 72:211

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gerancher JC, Grice SC, Dewan MD, Eisenach J (2000) An evaluation of informed consent prior to epidural analgesia for labor and delivery. Int J Obstet Anesth 9:168–173

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jackson GN, Sensky T, Reide P, Yentis SM (2011) The capacity to consent to epidural analgesia in labour. Int J Obstet Anesth 20(3):269–270

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Krzysztof M, Kuczkowski MD (2003) Informed consent, the parturient, and obstetric anaesthesia (Editorial). J Clin Anesth 15:573–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hoehner PJ (2003) Ethical aspects of informed consent in obstetric anaesthesia – new challenges and solutions. J Clin Anaesth 15:587–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Anim-Somuah M, Smyth RM, Jones L (2011) Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (12):CD000331

    Google Scholar 

  12. Torvaldsen S, Roberts CL, Bell JC, Raynes-Greenow CH (2004) Discontinuation of epidural analgesia late in labour for reducing the adverse delivery outcomes associated with epidural analgesia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (4):CD004457

    Google Scholar 

  13. Comparative Obstetric Mobile Epidural Trial (COMET) Study Group UK (2001) Effect of low-dose mobile versus traditional epidural techniques on mode of delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet 358(9275):19–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland (2006) Consent for anaesthesia. http://www.aagbi.org/publications/guidelines/docs/consent06.pdf. Accessed 28 Sept, 2014

  15. White LA, Gorton P, Wee MYK, Mandal N (2003) Written information about epidural analgesia for women in labour: did it improve knowledge? Int J Obstet Anaesth 12:93–97

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Fiori A, Marchetti D (2013) L’articolo 3 della Legge “Balduzzi” n. 189/2012 ed i vecchi e nuovi problemi della medicina legale (The third article of the law 189/2012. Old and new questions for the legal Medicine). Riv It Med Leg 2:563–573

    Google Scholar 

  17. Samanta A, Samanta J, Gunn M (2003) Legal consideration of clinical guidelines: will NICE make a difference? J R Soc Med 96:133–138

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fearnley RA, Bell MDD, Bodenham AR (2012) Status of national guidelines in dictating individual clinical practice and defining negligence. BJA 108(4):557–561

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio G. Spagnolo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Marchetti, D., Spagnolo, A.G. (2015). Medicolegal Issues in Labor Analgesia. In: Capogna, G. (eds) Epidural Labor Analgesia. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13890-9_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13890-9_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-13889-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-13890-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics