Skip to main content

Toward a Dynamical Approach for Systematic Conservation Planning of Eastern English Channel Fisheries

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Marine Productivity: Perturbations and Resilience of Socio-ecosystems

Abstract

In the past decade, systematic conservation planning tools have been increasingly and successfully used to set spatial conservation plans that meet quantitative protection targets while minimizing enforcement and socioeconomic costs. However, when applied to fisheries, systematic conservation planning fails to account for (1) changes in fleet dynamics induced by new conservation constraints and their associated feedbacks on conservation costs or (2) their influence on fish population dynamics and distributions, which may in turn alter the achievement of conservation targets. Such a static approach may therefore lead to short- or medium-term misestimates in forecasted costs and target achievements. In order to circumvent such limitations of systematic conservation planning, we present a first attempt to couple a conservation planning tool (Marxan with Zones) with a mixed fisheries dynamics simulation model (ISIS-Fish), applied to the Eastern English Channel fisheries. Broad principles and perspectives are discussed and anticipated future challenges of such an approach are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Note that a PU can pertain to only one conservation zone at a time.

References

  • Ban NC, Adams VM, Almany GR, Ban S, Cinner JE, McCook LJ, Mills M, Pressey RL, White A (2011) Designing, implementing and managing marine protected areas: emerging trends and opportunities for coral reef nations. Coral Reefs Future Dir 408:21–31. doi:10.1016/j.jembe.2011.07.023

    Google Scholar 

  • Batsleer J, Poos J, Marchal P, Vermard Y, Rijnsdorp A (2013) Mixed fisheries management: protecting the weakest link. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 479:177–190. doi:10.3354/meps10203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpentier A, Martin CS, Vaz S (eds) (2009) Channel habitat atlas for marine resource management, final report (CHARM phase II). INTERREG 3a Programme, IFREMER, Boulogne-sur-mer, France, 626 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Delavenne J, Metcalfe K, Smith RJ, Vaz S, Martin CS, Dupuis L, Coppin F, Carpentier A (2012) Systematic conservation planning in the eastern English Channel: comparing the Marxan and Zonation decision-support tools. ICES J Mar Sci J Conserv 69:75–83. doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsr180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delavenne J, Marchal P, Vaz S (2013) Defining a pelagic typology of the eastern English Channel. Cont Shelf Res 52:87–96. doi:10.1016/j.csr.2012.10.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desprez M (2000) Physical and biological impact of marine aggregate extraction along the French coast of the Eastern English Channel: short- and long-term post-dredging restoration. ICES J Mar Sci 57:1428–1438. doi:10.1006/jmsc.2000.0926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drouineau H, Mahévas S, Pelletier D, Beliaeff B (2006) Assessing the impact of different management options using ISIS-Fish: the French Merluccius merlucciusNephrops norvegicus mixed fishery of the Bay of Biscay. Aquat Living Resour 19:15–29. doi:10.1051/alr:2006002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaines SD, Lester SE, Grorud-Colvert K, Costello C, Pollnac R (2010) Marine reserves special feature: evolving science of marine reserves: new developments and emerging research frontiers. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107:18251–18255. doi:10.1073/pnas.1002098107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gasche L, Mahévas S, Marchal P (2013) Supporting fisheries management by means of complex models: can we point out isles of robustness in a sea of uncertainty? PLoS ONE 8:e77566. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0077566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gasche L, Lehuta S, Mahévas S, Marchal P, Savina-Rolland M, Baulier L (in preparation) Can spatial management measures help robustly managing human activities in the eastern English Channel?

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein CJ, Steinback C, Watts M, Scholz AJ, Possingham HP (2009) Spatial marine zoning for fisheries and conservation. Front Ecol Environ 8:349–353. doi:10.1890/090047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraus G, Pelletier D, Dubreuil J, Mollmann C, Hinrichsen H-H, Bastardie F, Vermard Y, Mahevas S (2008) A model-based evaluation of marine protected areas: the example of eastern Baltic cod (Gadus morhua callarias L.). ICES J Mar Sci 66:109–121. doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsn166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leathwick J, Moilanen A, Francis M, Elith J, Taylor P, Julian K, Hastie T, Duffy C (2008) Novel methods for the design and evaluation of marine protected areas in offshore waters: designing offshore MPAs. Conserv Lett 1:91–102. doi:10.1111/j.1755-263X.2008.00012.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee J, South AB, Jennings S (2010) Developing reliable, repeatable, and accessible methods to provide high-resolution estimates of fishing-effort distributions from vessel monitoring system (VMS) data. ICES J Mar Sci J Conserv 67:1260–1271. doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsq010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehuta S, Mahévas S, Petitgas P, Pelletier D (2010) Combining sensitivity and uncertainty analysis to evaluate the impact of management measures with ISIS–Fish: marine protected areas for the Bay of Biscay anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus) fishery. ICES J Mar Sci J Conserv 67:1063–1075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehuta S, Mahévas S, Le Floc’h P, Petitgas P, Rose K (2013) A simulation-based approach to assess sensitivity and robustness of fisheries management indicators for the pelagic fishery in the Bay of Biscay. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 70:1741–1756. doi:10.1139/cjfas-2013-0066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehuta S, Vermard Y, Marchal P (2015) A spatial model of the mixed demersal fisheries in the eastern channel marine productivity: perturbations and resilience of socio-ecosystems. In: Ceccaldi H-J et al (eds) Proceedings of the 15th French-Japan oceanography symposium (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Leslie HM (2005) A synthesis of marine conservation planning approaches. Conserv Biol 19:1701–1713. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00268.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahévas S, Pelletier D (2004) ISIS-Fish, a generic and spatially explicit simulation tool for evaluating the impact of management measures on fisheries dynamics. Ecol Model 171:65–84. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2003.04.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchal P, Little LR, Thebaud O (2011) Quota allocation in mixed fisheries: a bioeconomic modelling approach applied to the Channel flatfish fisheries. ICES J Mar Sci 68:1580–1591. doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsr096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin CS, Carpentier A, Vaz S, Coppin F, Curet L, Dauvin J-C, Delavenne J, Dewarumez J-M, Dupuis L, Engelhard G, Ernande B, Foveau A, Garcia C, Gardel L, Harrop S, Just R, Koubbi P, Lauria V, Meaden GJ, Morin J, Ota Y, Rostiaux E, Smith R, Spilmont N, Vérin Y, Villanueva C, Warembourg C (2010) The Channel habitat atlas for marine resource management (CHARM): an aid for planning and decision-making in an area under strong anthropogenic pressure. Aquat Living Resour 22:499–508. doi:10.1051/alr/2009051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe K, Roberts T, Smith RJ, Harrop SR (2013) Marine conservation science and governance in North–West Europe: conservation planning and international law and policy. Mar Policy 39:289–295. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2012.12.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelletier D, Mahevas S, Drouineau H, Vermard Y, Thebaud O, Guyader O, Poussin B (2009) Evaluation of the bioeconomic sustainability of multi-species multi-fleet fisheries under a wide range of policy options using ISIS-Fish. Ecol Model 220:1013–1033. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.01.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rochet M-J, Prigent M, Bertrand JA, Carpentier A, Coppin F, Delpech J-P, Fontenelle G, Foucher E, Mahe K, Rostiaux E, Trenkel VM (2008) Ecosystem trends: evidence for agreement between fishers’ perceptions and scientific information. ICES J Mar Sci 65:1057–1068. doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsn062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rochette S, Huret M, Rivot E, Le Pape O (2012) Coupling hydrodynamic and individual-based models to simulate long-term larval supply to coastal nursery areas: modelling larval supply to coastal nurseries. Fish Oceanogr 21:229–242. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2419.2012.00621.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sala E (2002) A general model for designing networks of marine reserves. Science 298:1991–1993. doi:10.1126/science.1075284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith RJ, Eastwood PD, Ota Y, Rogers SI (2009) Developing best practice for using Marxan to locate marine protected areas in European waters. ICES J Mar Sci J Conserv 66:188–194. doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsn198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spalding MD, Fish L, Wood LJ (2008) Toward representative protection of the world’s coasts and oceans-progress, gaps, and opportunities: toward representative marine protection. Conserv Lett 1:217–226. doi:10.1111/j.1755-263X.2008.00030.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Syakur A, Wibowo JT, Firmansyah F, Azam I, Linkie M (2012) Ensuring local stakeholder support for marine conservation: establishing a locally-managed marine area network in Aceh. Oryx 46:516–524. doi:10.1017/S0030605312000166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watts ME, Klein CJ, Stewart RS, Ball IR, Possingham HP (2008) Marxan with Zones (V1.0.1): conservation zoning using spatially explicit annealing, a manual, http://www.uq.edu.au/marxan/documentation. Accessed 20 Jan 2015

  • Watts ME, Ball IR, Stewart RS, Klein CJ, Wilson K, Steinback C, Lourival R, Kircher L, Possingham HP (2009) Marxan with Zones: software for optimal conservation based land- and sea-use zoning. Spec Issue Simul Model Asia-Pac Reg SI ASIMMOD 24:1513–1521. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2009.06.005

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood LJ, Fish L, Laughren J, Pauly D (2008) Assessing progress towards global marine protection targets: shortfalls in information and action. Oryx. doi:10.1017/S003060530800046X

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank the French MPA Agency for providing up-to-date MPA limits. The study was funded by the Interreg IVa PANACHE (Protected Area Network Across the Channel Ecosystem) European project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yves Reecht .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Reecht, Y. et al. (2015). Toward a Dynamical Approach for Systematic Conservation Planning of Eastern English Channel Fisheries. In: Ceccaldi, HJ., Hénocque, Y., Koike, Y., Komatsu, T., Stora, G., Tusseau-Vuillemin, MH. (eds) Marine Productivity: Perturbations and Resilience of Socio-ecosystems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13878-7_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics