Abstract
Bitcoin is a peer-to-peer electronic cash system that uses a decentralized architecture. It has enjoyed superiority compared to other cyptocurrencies but it has also attracted attackers to take advantage of the possible operational insecurity. All the Bitcoin miners independently try to find the winning block by finding a hash lower than a particular target. On 14th June 2014, a particular mining pool was able to take control of 51% of Bitcoins processing power, thus extracting the maximum amount of profit for their work. In this paper, we introduce a new defense against this 51% attack. We modify the present block header by introducing some extra bytes and utilize the Timestamp more effectively in the hash generation and suggest an alternative to the existing Proof-of-Work scheme. The proposed approach does not rely on finding a hash value lower than the target, rather it awards the miner involved in generating the minimum hash value across the entire distributed network. Fraudulent activities easily get caught due to effective use of the Timestamp. The new scheme thus introduces fair competition among the miners. Moreover, it facilitates the generation of Bitcoins at a fixed rate. Finally, we calculate and show how the new scheme can lead to an energy-efficient Bitcoin.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bitcoin–Wiki. Address, https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Address
Bitcoin–Wiki. Bitcoin Wikipedia, https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Main_Page
Bitcoin–Wiki. Block hashing algorithm, https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Block_hashing_algorithm
Bitcoin–Wiki. ECDSA, https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Elliptic_Curve_Digital_Signature_Algorithm
Bitcoin–Wiki. Merkle Tree, https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Protocol_specification#Merkle_Trees
Bitcoin–Wiki. Network, https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Network
Bitcoin–Wiki. Proof of Burn, https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Proof_of_burn
Bitcoin–Wiki. Proof of Work Protocol, https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Proof_of_work
Bitcoin–Wiki. Protocol specification, https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Protocol_specification
Bitcoin Magazine. Government bans Professor mining bitcoin supercomputer, http://bitcoinmagazine.com/13774/government-bans-professor-mining-bitcoin-supercomputer/
Bitcoin Talk. Proof of stake instead of proof of work, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=27787.0
Bitcoinx. Mining pool giant GHash.io reaches 50% of bitcoin hashing power, http://www.bitcoinx.com/mining-pool-giant-ghash-io-reaches-50-of-bitcoin-hashing-power/
Blockchain. Average Transaction Confirmation Time, http://blockchain.info/charts/avg-confirmation-time?timespan=2year&showDataPoints=false&daysAverageString=1&show_header=true&scale=0&address=
Blockchain. Blocks, https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Block
Blockchain. Difficulty, http://blockchain.info/charts/difficulty?timespan=1year&showDataPoints=false&daysAverageString=1&show_header=true&scale=0&address=
Blockchain. Hash Rate, http://blockchain.info/charts/hash-rate?timespan=1year&showDataPoints=false&daysAverageString=1&show_header=true&scale=0&address=
Blockchain. Transactions, https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Transaction
Business Insider. Today, Bitcoin’s Doomsday Scenario Arrived, http://www.businessinsider.in/Today-Bitcoins-Doomsday-Scenario-Arrived/articleshow/36516972.cms#ixzz34amw9VI2
CoinDesk. Under the Microscope: Economic and Environmental Costs of Bitcoin Mining, http://www.coindesk.com/microscope-economic-environmental-costs-bitcoin-mining/
Eyal, Ittay and Sirer, Emin Gün Sirer. Majority is not enough: Bitcoin mining is vulnerable. CoRR, abs/1311.0243 (2013)
Forbes. Brilliant But Evil: Gaming Company Fined $1 Million For Secretly Using Players’ Computers To Mine Bitcoin. http://www.forbes.com/sites/kashmirhill/2013/11/19/brilliant-but-evil-gaming-company-turned-players-computers-into-unwitting-bitcoin-mining-slaves/
Frequently Asked Questions. Transactions, https://bitcoin.org/en/faq#why-do-i-have-to-wait-10-minutes .
Gizmodo. The World’s Most Powerful Computer Network Is Being Wasted on Bitcoin, http://gizmodo.com/the-worlds-most-powerful-computer-network-is-being-was-504503726
Learn Cryptography. 51% Attack, http://learncryptography.com/51-attack/
Nakamoto, S.: Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system (May 2009)
Santoro, N.: Design and Analysis of Distributed Algorithms. Wiley Series on Parallel and Distributed Computing, pp. 71–76. Wiley Interscience (2006)
The Guardian. Student uses university computers to mine Dogecoin, http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/mar/04/dogecoin-bitcoin-imperial-college-student-mine
The Harvard Crimson. Harvard Research Computing Resources Misused for Dogecoin Mining Operation, http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2014/2/20/harvard-odyssey-dogecoin/
Wikipedia. Proof-of-stake — Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Proof-of-stake&oldid=615023202
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Paul, G., Sarkar, P., Mukherjee, S. (2014). Towards a More Democratic Mining in Bitcoins. In: Prakash, A., Shyamasundar, R. (eds) Information Systems Security. ICISS 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8880. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13841-1_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13841-1_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-13840-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-13841-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)