Foundational Aspects of Family–School Connections: Definitions, Conceptual Frameworks, and Research Needs

Chapter
Part of the Research on Family-School Partnerships book series (RFSP, volume 1)

Abstract

Connections between families and schools are viewed as a key element of children’s positive adjustment, and are linked to children’s academic, social, emotional, and behavioral functioning. However, there is great variability in how these connections are defined and conceptualized. This chapter provides a brief description of some of the core features of family–school connections. The key elements of two commonly employed approaches to family–school connections are outlined. Structural approaches are conceptualized as those that focus on activities and behaviors of parents to promote their children’s development and learning. Relational approaches are conceptualized as those that focus on partnerships between families and schools to support children across social, emotional, behavioral, and academic domains. Although these two approaches share some core features of family–school connections, they are often undertaken in isolation. The goal of this chapter is to bring together these two approaches and orient them within the broader context of family–school connections. Building on this metamodel of family–school partnerships, a research agenda focused on a framework of relationally embedded family–school connections is offered.

Keywords

Parental involvement Family-school partnerships Family-school connections Structural approaches Relational approaches Continuity Consistency Ecological models 

References

  1. Aeby, V. G., Manning, B. H., Thyer, B. A., & Carpenter-Aeby, T. (1999). Comparing outcomes of an alternative school program offered with and without intensive family involvement. The School Community Journal, 9, 17–32.Google Scholar
  2. Albright, M. L., & Weissberg, R. P. (2010). School-family partnerships to promote social and emotional learning. In S. L. Christenson & A. L. Reschly (Eds.), The handbook of school-family partnerships for promoting student competence (pp. 246–265). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Barbarin, O. A., Downer, J. T., Odom, E., & Head, D. (2010). Home-school differences in beliefs, support, and control during public pre-kindergarten and their link to childrenʼs kindergarten readiness. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 25, 358–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnard, W. M. (2004). Parent involvement in elementary school and educational attainment. Children & Youth Services Review, 26, 39–62. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2003.11.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1992). Ecological systems theory. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Six theories of child development: Revised formulations and current issues. (pp. 187–249). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
  7. Cheung, C. S-S., & Pomerantz, E. M. (2012). Why does parentsʼ involvement enhance childrenʼs achievement? The role of parent-oriented motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 820–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Christenson, S. L., & Carlson, C. (2005). Evidence-based parent and family interventions in school psychology: State of scientifically based practice. School Psychology Quarterly, 20, 525–528. doi:10.1521/scpq.2005.20.4.525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Christenson, S. L., & Sheridan, S. M. (2001). Schools and families: Creating essential connections for learning. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  10. Crosnoe, R., Leventhal, T., Wirth, R. J., Pierce, K. M., & Pianta, R. C. (2010). Family socioeconomic status and consistent environmental stimulation in early childhood. Child Development, 81, 972–987. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01446.x.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Dishion, T. J., & Stormshak, E. A. (2007). Intervening in childrenʼs lives: An ecological, family-centered approach to mental health care. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Domina, T. (2005). Leveling the home advantage: Assessing the effectiveness of parental involvement in elementary school. Sociology of Education, 78, 233–249. doi:10.1177/003804070507800303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Downer, J. T., & Myers, S. S. (2010). Application of a developmental/ecological model to family-school partnerships. In S. L. Christenson & A. L. Reschly (Eds.), The handbook on school-family partnerships for promoting student competence (pp. 3–29). Philadelphia: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Early, D. M., Pianta, R. C., Taylor, L. C., & Cox, M. J. (2001). Transition practices: Findings from a national survey of kindergarten teachers. Early Childhood Education Journal, 28, 199–206. doi:10.1023/a:1026503520593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fan, X., & Chen, M. (2001). Parental involvement and studentsʼ academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 1–22. doi:10.1023/A:1009048817385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fantuzzo, J., McWayne, C., Perry, M. A., & Childs, S. (2004). Multiple dimensions of family involvement and their relations to behavioral and learning competencies for urban, low-income children. School Psychology Review, 33, 467–480.Google Scholar
  17. Fantuzzo, J., Perry, M. A., & Childs, S. (2006). Parent satisfaction with educational experiences scale: A multivariate examination of parent satisfaction with early childhood education programs. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 21, 142–152. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2006.04.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ginsburg-Block, M., Manz, P. H., & McWayne, C. (2010). Partnering to foster achievement in reading and mathematics. In S. L. Christenson & A. Reschly (Eds.), Handbook of school-family partnerships (pp. 175–203). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  19. Grolnick, W. S., & Slowiaczek, M. L. (1994). Parentsʼ involvement in childrenʼs schooling: A multidimensional conceptualization and motivational model. Child Development, 65, 237–252. doi:10.2307/1131378.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hill, N. E., & Craft, S. A. (2003). Parent-school involvement and school performance: Mediated pathways among socioeconomically comparable African American and Euro-American families. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 74–83. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hill, N. E., & Tyson, D. F. (2009). Parental involvement in middle school: A meta-analytic assessment of the strategies that promote achievement. Developmental Psychology, 45, 740–763. doi:10.1037/a0015362.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hobbs, N. (1966). Helping disturbed children: Psychological and ecological strategies. American Psychologist, 21, 1105–1115. doi:10.1037/h0021115.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., & Sandler, H. M. (2005). Final performance report for OERI grant #R305T010673: The social context of parental involvement: A path to enhanced achievement (Final report, OERI/IES grant #R305T010673). Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University, Department of Psychology & Human Development. http://vanderbilt.edu/Peabody/family-school.
  24. Jeynes, W. H. (2003). The effects of parental involvement on minority children’s academic achievement. Education and Urban Society, 35, 202–218. doi:10.1177/0013124502239392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jeynes, W. H. (2005a). The effects of parental involvement on the academic achievement of African American youth. Journal of Negro Education, 74, 260–274.Google Scholar
  26. Jeynes, W. H. (2005b). A meta-analysis of the relation of parental involvement to urban elementary school student academic achievement. Urban Education, 40, 237–269. doi:10.1177/0042085905274540.Google Scholar
  27. Jeynes, W. H. (2007). The relationship between parental involvement and urban secondary school student academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Urban Education, 42, 82–110. doi:10.1177/0042085906293818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jung, L. A. (2010). Identifying familiesʼ supports and resources. In R. A. McWilliam (Ed.), Working with families of young children with special needs (pp. 9–26). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  29. Lareau, A., & Muñoz, V. L. (2012). “You’re not going to call the shots”: Structural conflicts between the principal and the PTO at a suburban public elementary school. Sociology of Education, 85, 201–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lines, C., Miller, G. E., & Arthur-Stanley, A. (2010). The power of family-school partnering. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Ma, X. (1999). Dropping out of advanced mathematics: The effects of parental involvement. Teachers College Record, 101, 60–81. doi:10.1111/0161-4681.00029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Masten, A. S., & Coatsworth, J. D. (1998). The development of competence in favorable and unfavorable environments: Lessons from research on successful children. American Psychologist, 53, 205–220. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.53.2.205.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Mattingly, D. J., Prislin, R., McKenzie, T. L., Rodriguez, J. L., & Kayzar, B. (2002). Evaluating evaluations: The case of parent involvement programs. Review of Educational Research, 72, 549–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McKay, M. M., & Bannon, W. M., Jr. (2004). Engaging families in child mental health services. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 13, 905–921. doi:10.1016/j.chc.2004.04.001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Miedel, W. T., & Reynolds, A. J. (1999). Parent involvement in early intervention for disadvantaged children: Does it matter? Journal of School Psychology, 37, 379–402. doi:10.1016/s0022-4405(99)00023-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Phelan, P., Davidson, A. L., & Yu, H. C. (1998). Adolescentsʼ worlds: Negotiating family, peers, and school. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  37. Pomerantz, E. M., Moorman, E. A., & Litwack, S. D. (2007). The how, whom, and why of parentsʼ involvement in childrenʼs academic lives: More is not always better. Review of Educational Research, 77, 373–410. doi:10.3102/003465430305567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pomerantz, E. M., Kim, E. M., & Cheung, C. S-S. (2011). Parentsʼ involvement in childrenʼs learning. In K. R. Harris, S. Graham, & T. Urdan (Eds.), The APA educational psychology handbook (Vol. 2). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  39. Power, T. J., Mautone, J. A., Soffer, S. L., Clarke, A. T., Marshall, S. A., Sharman, J., et al. (2012). A family–school intervention for children with ADHD: Results of a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 80, 611–623. doi:10.1037/a0028188.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., & Pianta, R. C. (2000). An ecological perspective on the transition to kindergarten: A theoretical framework to guide empirical research. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 21, 491–511. doi:10.1016/s0193-3973(00)00051-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sénéchal, M. (2006). Testing the home literacy model: Parent involvement in kindergarten is differentially related to grade 4 reading comprehension, fluency, spelling, and reading for pleasure. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10, 59–87. doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr1001_4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sheridan, S. M., & Kratochwill, T. R. (2008). Conjoint behavioral consultation. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  43. Sheridan, S. M., Knoche, L. L., Edwards, C. P., Bovaird, J. A., & Kupzyk, K. A. (2010). Parent engagement and school readiness: Effects of the getting ready intervention on preschool childrenʼs social-emotional competencies. Early Education and Development, 21, 125–156. doi:10.1080/10409280902783517.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Sheridan, S. M., Knoche, L. L., Kupzyk, K. A., Edwards, C. P., & Marvin, C. A. (2011). A randomized trial examining the effects of parent engagement on early language and literacy: The getting ready intervention. Journal of School Psychology, 49, 361–383. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2011.03.001.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Sheridan, S. M., Bovaird, J. A., Glover, T. A., Garbacz, S. A., Witte, A., & Kwon, K. (2012). A randomized trial examining the effects of conjoint behavioral consultation and the mediating role of the parent–teacher relationship. School Psychology Review, 41, 23–46.Google Scholar
  46. Sheridan, S. M., Rispoli, K. M., & Holmes, S. R. (2014). Treatment integrity in conjoint behavioral consultation: Conceptualizing active ingredients and potential pathways of influence. In L. M. Hagermoser Sanetti & T. R. Kratochwill (Eds.), Treatment integrity: A foundation for evidence-based practice in applied psychology (pp. 255–278). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Simpkins, S. D., Weiss, H. B., McCartney, K., Kreider, H. M., & Dearing, E. (2006). Mother-child relationship as a moderator of the relation between family educational involvement and child achievement. Parenting: Science and Practice, 6, 49–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Trusty, J. (1999). Effects of eighth-grade parental involvement on late adolescentsʼ educational expectations. Journal of Research & Development in Education, 32, 224–233.Google Scholar
  49. Turnbull, A. P., Blue-Banning, M., Turbiville, V., & Park, J. (1999). From parent education to partnership education: A call for a transformed focus. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 19, 164–172. doi:10.1177/027112149901900308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vickers, H. S., & Minke, K. M. (1995). Exploring parent teacher relationships: Joining and communication to others. School Psychology Quarterly, 10, 133–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. White, K. R., Taylor, M. J., & Moss, V. D. (1992). Does research support claims about the benefits of involving parents in early intervention programs? Review of Educational Research, 62, 91–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nebraska Center for Research on Children, Youth, Families and SchoolsUniversity of Nebraska-LincolnLincolnUSA
  2. 2.Nebraska Center for Research on Children, Youth, Families and Schools, National Center for Research on Rural EducationUniversity of Nebraska-LincolnLincolnUSA

Personalised recommendations