Abstract
The Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) trend, allows employees to bring personal devices of their choice into the work environment. Since quality goals vary between employees and the organization where they work, it is difficult for software developers to deliver quality product that will satisfy both parties at the same time. This study presents seven findings: First, visible features of the software and functional requirements supersede nonfunctional (quality) characteristics when dealing with customer requirements; second, quality depends more on the market decision than standards’ requirements; third, companies focus on ‘just enough quality’ and not on ‘high quality’ products; fourth, software quality has a dimension of cost; fifth, organizations try to alleviate threats brought by employees’ device or software through policies (quality aspect of policy) ; sixth, simplicity and attractiveness of devices sell poor quality software; and seventh, the number of product features does not affect the sense of quality, but quality characteristics do. These findings identify the role of software customers in deciding about the quality of products and the impact in the BYOD. Software is developed according to end-user requirements, and the end-user has the freedom to choose devices, applications software, and place to use the devices including working environment, where the software may cause risk to the company.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Scarfo, A: New Security Perspectives around BYOD. In: 7th International Conference on Broadband, Wireless Computing, Communication and Applications (BWCCA), Victoria, BC, pp. 446 – 451 (2012).
ISO/IEC-25020: Software Engineering — Software quality requirements and evaluation (SQuaRE) —Quality measurement, Geneva, Switzerland, International Organization for Standardization (2007)
Aslhford, N.A., Ayer, C., Stone, R.F.: Using Regulation to Change the Market for Innovation (1985), http://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/1555/%252319.PDF?sequence=1 (accessed on May 7, 2014)
Kalyani, M.: Setting Standards for the Murky Cloud Market (2013), https://spideroak.com/privacypost/business-the-cloud/cloud-computing-regulations-on-the-rise/ (accessed on May 7, 2014)
Osterweil, L.J.: Software processes are software too. In: The 19th International Conference on Software Engineering, Boston, pp. 343–344 (1997)
Strauss, A.L., Corbin, J.: Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Applications. Sage Publication, Newbury Park (1990)
ISO/IEC-25051: Software engineering — Software product Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE) — Requirements for quality of Commercial Off-The-Self (COTS) software product and instructions for testing, Geneva, Switzerland, International Organization for Standardization (2006)
Dromey, R.G., McGettrick, A.D.: On Specifying Software Quality. Software Quality Journal 1(1), 45–74 (1992)
Boehm, B.W.: Software engineering economics. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering Se-10(1), 4–21 (1984)
Jørgensen, M.: Software Quality Measurement. Advances in Engineering Software 30(2), 907–912 (1999)
Chao, G.: The usability test methods and design principles in the human-computer interface design. In: 2nd IEEE International Conference on Human-computer Interaction: Computer Science and Information Technology, ICCSIT, Beijing, pp. 283–285 (2009)
Sophos.: BYOD Risks & Rewards, http://www.sophos.com/en-us/security-news-trends/security-trends/byod-risks-rewards/what-is-byos.aspx (accesses on September 26, 2014)
Stewart, J.N.: Cisco Annual Security Report Documents Unprecedented Growth of Advanced Attacks and Malicious Traffic (2014), http://newsroom.cisco.com/release/1310011/Cisco-Annual-Security-Report-Documents-Unprecedented-Growth-of-Advanced-Attacks-and-Malicious-Traffic
Truong, H.T.T., Lagerspetz, E., Nurmi, P., Oliner, A.J., Tarkoma, S., Asokan, N., Bhattacharya, S.: The Company You Keep: Mobile Malware Infection Rates and Inexpensive Risk Indicators. In: The International World Wide Web Conference (WWW 2014), Seoul, Korea (2014)
Park, C., Pattipati, K.R., An, W., Kleinman, D.L.: Quantifying the Im-pact of Information and Organizational Structures via Distributed Auction Algorithm: Point-to-Point Communication Structure. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans 42(1), 68–86 (2012)
Seth, F.P., Taipale, O., Smolander, K.: Organizational and Customer re-lated Challenges of Software Testing: An Empirical Study in 11 Software Companies. In: IEEE-RCIS 2014 Conference, Marrakech (2014a)
Seth, F.P., Mustonen-Ollila, E., Taipale, O.: The Influence of Management on Software Product Quality: An Empirical Study in Software Developing Companies. In: Barafort, B., O’Connor, R.V., Poth, A., Messnarz, R. (eds.) EuroSPI 2014. CCIS, vol. 425, pp. 147–158. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)
Hovenden, F.M., Walker, S.D., Sharp, H.C., Woodman, M.: Building quality into scientific software. Software Quality Journal 5(1), 25–32 (1996)
Seth, F.P., Mustonen-Ollila, E., Taipale, O., Smolander, K.: Software Quality Construction: Empirical Study on the Role of Requirements, Stake-holders and Resources. In: Asia Pacific Software Engineering Conference APSEC 2012, Hong Kong, pp. 17–26 (2012)
Smolander, K.: Four metaphors of architecture in software organizations: Finding out the meaning of architecture in practice. In: International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering (ISESE 2002), Nara, Japan (2002)
Garvin, D.A.: What Does “Product Quality” Really Mean? Sloan Management Review (4), 25–43 (1984)
Kitchenham, B., Pfleeger, S.L.: Software Quality: The Elusive Target. IEEE Software 13(1), 12–21 (1996)
Clarke, P., O’Connor, R.V.: Business Success in Software SMEs: Recommendations for Future SPI Studies. In: Winkler, D., O’Connor, R.V., Messnarz, R. (eds.) EuroSPI 2012. CCIS, vol. 301, pp. 1–12. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
Barney, S., Wohlin, C.: Software Product Quality: Ensuring a Common Goal. In: Wang, Q., Garousi, V., Madachy, R., Pfahl, D. (eds.) ICSP 2009. LNCS, vol. 5543, pp. 256–267. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
Mäkinen, S., Münch, J.: Effects of test-driven development: A comparative analysis of empirical studies. In: Winkler, D., Biffl, S., Bergsmann, J. (eds.) SWQD 2014. LNBIP, vol. 166, pp. 155–169. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)
Sangroha, D., Gupta, V.: Exploring Security Theory Approach in BYOD Environment, Wireless Networks and Security. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Advanced Computing, Networking and Informatics (ICACNI 2014), Kolkata, India, pp. 259–266 (2014)
Eisenhardt, K.M.: Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review 14, 532–550 (1989)
Perner, L.: (2008), http://www.consumerpsychologist.com/marketing_introduction.html (accessed on June 17, 2014)
Savolainen, J., Kauppinen, M., Mannisto, T.: Identifying Key Requirements for a New Product Line. In: 14th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (IEEE-APSEC 2007), Aichi, pp. 478–485 (2007)
Xue, J., Chen, C.W.: 2011 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME), Barcelona, pp. 1–6 (2011)
Hashimi, U.S., Anjum, N., Israr, A.: Impact of Software Quality Standards on Commercial Product Development and Customer Satisfaction for Software Industry in Pakistan. In: Fifth International Conference on Computaional Intelligence, Modelling and Simulation (CIMSim), Seoul, pp. 269–274 (2013)
Chang, S.E., Lee, P.-F.: Leveraging Social Network APIs for Enhancing Smartphone Apps. In: IEEE International Conference on and IEEE Cyber, Physical and Social Computing, Beijing, pp. 1219–1224 (2013)
Van Manen, M.: Researching lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitivity Pedagogy. Althouse Press, London (1990)
Klein, H.K., Myers, M.D.: A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quarterly 23(1), 67–94 (1999)
Arthur, C.: Why BlackBerry failed (2013), http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/nov/05/why-blackberry-failed (accessed on May 23, 2014)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Seth, F.P., Taipale, O., Smolander, K. (2014). Role of Software Product Customer in the Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) Trend: Empirical Observations on Software Quality Construction. In: Jedlitschka, A., Kuvaja, P., Kuhrmann, M., Männistö, T., Münch, J., Raatikainen, M. (eds) Product-Focused Software Process Improvement. PROFES 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8892. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13835-0_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13835-0_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-13834-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-13835-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)