Advertisement

The Role of Context and Culture in Quality of Life Studies

Chapter
Part of the Social Indicators Research Series book series (SINS, volume 55)

Abstract

Culture endures forms in which practices and specific belief systems are implied in social relations and experienced within them. The inclusion of culture by the social actors, leads to the question of identity, regarded as a set of internalized cultural repertoires through which social actors symbolically outline their borders, thus differentiating themselves from the rest of the social actors, in socially structured and historically specific contexts. On the other hand we presume, like that quality of life is a multidimensional phenomenon which involves a variety of elements that refer to human needs whose satisfaction requires material and immaterial elements. Likewise, we believe that the objective and subjective dimensions of life are distinct entities and that people carry out a positive or negative assessment of their life experiences according to what they consider to be good, their conception of it, and of everything that occurs in a specific cultural background, in space and time, the notions of well-being have cultural roots. Considering the above mentioned, this chapter focuses on the notion of culture, the research on the relationship between culture and quality of life, and the impact of culture on the qualitative researcher.

Keywords

Culture Context Relationship culture-quality of life Impact in the researcher 

Notes

Acknowledgement

I am particularly thankful to Drs. Carmen Dragonetti and Fernando Tola for anticipating all discussions on culture, its diversities, and the position of researchers about it, making of contemporary dialogue with others their starting point for the interpretation of other cultural contexts. Their teachings excel academic level and allow us a return to life with higher knowledge, greater pleasure, and huge pride in been their student.

I am, further, very thankful for the generous contributions made by Cecilia Onaha, Sergio Hernández Galindo, Eugenia Arduino, Irene Cafiero, Miguel Marlaire and Vilma Carrizo de Hadat.

References

  1. Banks, M. (1996). Ethnicity: Anthropological constructions. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Bassand, M., & Hainard, F. (1985). Dynamique socio-culturelle régionale. Lausanne: Presses Polytechniques Romandes.Google Scholar
  3. Berry, J. W., Trimble, J. E., & Olmedo, E. L. (1986). Assessment of acculturation. In W. J. Lonner & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Field methods in cross-cultural research. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Bourdieu, P. (1980). Le sens pratique. Paris: Editions de Minuit.Google Scholar
  5. Bourdieu, P. (1987). Choses dites. París: Les Editions de Minuit.Google Scholar
  6. Ceglowski, D. (2000). Research as relationship. Qualitative Inquiry, 6, 88–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chaitin, J, Linstroth, J. P., & Hiller. P. T. (2009). Ethnicity and Belonging: An Overview of a Study of Cuban, Haitian and Guatemalan Immigrants to Florida. Forum: Qualitative Social research, 10, 3, 12. http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1363/2856. Accessed 10 Feb 2014.
  8. Christians, C. G. (2011). La ética y la política en la investigación cualitativa. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Manual de investigación cualitativa. Volumen l. El campo de la investigación cualitativa (pp. 283–331). Barcelona: Gedisa.Google Scholar
  9. Christopher, J. C. (1999). Situating psychological well-being: Exploring the cultural roots of its theory and research. Journal of Counselling and Development, 77, 141–152.Google Scholar
  10. Corbin Dwyer, S., & Buckle, J. L. (2009). The space between: On being and insider-outsider in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(1), 54–63.Google Scholar
  11. Daly, K. (1992). The fit between qualitative research and characteristics of families. In J. F. Gilgun, K. Day & G. Handel (Eds.), Qualitative methods in family research. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Denzin, N. K., Lincoln, Y. S., & Smith, L. T. (2008). Introduction: Critical methodologies and indigenous inquiry. In N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln, & L. T. Smith (Eds.), Handbook of critical and Indigenous methodologies (pp. 1–20). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S., (2011). Introducción general. La investigación cualitativa como disciplina y como práctica. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Comps.), Manual de investigación cualitativa. Volumen l. El campo de la investigación cualitativa (pp. 43–101). Barcelona: Gedisa.Google Scholar
  14. Dickson-Swift, V., James, E. L., Kippen, S., & Liamputtong P. (2006). Blurring boundaries in qualitative research on sesitive topics. Qualitative Health Research, 16, 853–871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dickson-Swift, V., James, E. L., Kippen, S., & Liamputtong P. (2007). Doing sensitive research: What challenges do qualitative researchers face? Qualitative Research, 7(3), 327–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75.Google Scholar
  17. Diener, E., & Diener, M. (1995). Cross-cultural correlates of life satisfaction and self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 653–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Diener, E., & Fujita, F. (1994). Social comparisosns and subjective well-being. In B. P. Buunk & F. X. Gibbons (Eds.), Health, coping and well-being (pp. 329–357). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  19. Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1997). Measuring quality of life: Economic, social and subjective indicators. Social Indicators Research, 40(1–2), 189–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Diener, E., Gohm, C. L., Suh, E., & Oishi S. (2000). Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31(4), 419–436.Google Scholar
  21. Dovidio, J. F., Hewstone, M., Glick, P., & Esses, V. M. (2010). Prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination: Theoretical and empirical overview. In J. F. Dovidio, M. Hewstone, P. Glick & V. M. Esses (Eds.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (pp. 3–28). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  22. Dube, S.-coord- (1999). Pasados Poscoloniales. México. El Colegio de México.Google Scholar
  23. Dussel, E. (2006). 20 tesis de política. México: Siglo XXI-Crefal.Google Scholar
  24. El Ghali, K. (2011). Los retos de la universidad marroquí en la sociedad del conocimiento. Magriberia, 4, 61–71.Google Scholar
  25. Estermann, J. (1998). Filosofía andina. Estudio intercultural de la sabiduría autóctona andina. Quito: Ediciones Abya-Yala.Google Scholar
  26. Finlay, L. (2005). ‘Reflexive embodied empathy’: A phenomenology of participant-researcher intersubjectivity. Paper for 2005 Methods issue #4 The Humanistic Psychologist. http://www.google.com.ar/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CC4QFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lindafinlay.co.uk%2FReflexive_embodied_empathy_new.doc&ei=fILAUuCxI461kQf9ooD4Cg&usg=AFQjCNFtavDiu2ALApCvtxhuPYImczxqEg. Accessed 12 Feb 2014.
  27. Finlay, L. (2009). Embracing researcher subjectivity in phenomenological research: A response to Ann Scott. European Journal for Qualitative Research in Psychotherapy, 4, 13–20.Google Scholar
  28. Forougui, E. (1995). Cross-cultural quality of life among Persians. Master Thesis of Clinical Psychology. School of Psychology, Deakin University, Australia.Google Scholar
  29. Frost, N., Nolas, S-M., Brooks-Gordon, B., Esin, C., Holt, A., Mehdizadeh, L., & Shinebourne P. (2010). Pluralism in qualitative research: The impact of different researchers and qualitative approaches on the analysis of qualitative data. Qualitative Research, 10(4), 1–20. http://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/5000/1/QRJ366802.pdf. Accessed 26 Jan 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Giménez, G. (2000). Identidades en globalización. Espiral, 7(19), 27–48.Google Scholar
  31. Giménez, G. (2004). Culturas e identidades. Revista Mexicana de Sociología. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=32109908. Accessed 23 Jan 2014.Google Scholar
  32. Giménez, G. (2005). La concepción simbólica de la cultura. In G. Giménez (Ed.), Teoría y análisis de la cultura (pp. 67–88). México: CONACULTA e Instituto Coahuilense de CulturaGoogle Scholar
  33. Gokdemir, O., & Dumludag, D. (2011). Subjective well-being among ethnic minorities: the Dutch case. MPRA Paper No. 38691. http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/38691/.
  34. Goodenough, W. H. (1975). Cultura, lenguaje y sociedad. In J. S. Khan (Ed.), El concepto de cultura. Textos fundamentales (pp. 157–249). Barcelona: Anagrama.Google Scholar
  35. Grimson, A. (2012). Los límites de la cultura. Buenos Aires: Siglo Veintiuno Editores.Google Scholar
  36. Grossber, L. (2003). Identidad y estudios culturales. In S. Hall & du P. Gay. Cuestiones de identidad. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.Google Scholar
  37. Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qulitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Comps.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 105–117). Thousand Oaks (California): Sage.Google Scholar
  38. Hofstede, G. (1984). The cultural relativity of the quality of life Concept. The Academy of Management Review, 9(3), 389–398.Google Scholar
  39. Kanuha, V. K. (2000). “Being” native versus “going native”: Conducting social work research as an insider. Social Work, 45(5), 439–447.Google Scholar
  40. Kawana-Singer, M., Padilla, G. V., & Ashig-Giwa K. (2010). Health-related quality of life and culture. Seminars in Oncology Nursing, 26(1), 59–67. http://www.seminarsoncologynursing.com/article/S0749-2081(09)00115-6/fulltext. Accessed 28 Dec 2013.Google Scholar
  41. Liamputtong, P. (2010). Cross-cultural research and qualitative inquiry. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 1(1), 16–29.Google Scholar
  42. Liamputtong, P., & Ezzy, D. (2005). Qualitative research methods. South Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Lincoln, Y. S., & Denzin, N. K. (2000). The seventh moment: Out of the past. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 1047–1065). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  44. Lipiansky, E. M. (1992). Identité et communication. París: Presses Universitarires de France.Google Scholar
  45. Mojica Mendieta, F. J. (2011). Investigación cualitativa, epistemología y poder simbólico. Trama. Revista de Tecnología, cultura y desarrollo, ll, 2, pp. 7–20. http://www.tec.ac.cr/sitios/Docencia/cienciassociales/revista_trama/pdf/revista.pdf. Accessed 20 Dec 2013.
  46. Oishi, S., Diener, E. F., Lucas, R. E., & Suh, E. M. (1999). Cross-cultural variations in predictors of life satisfaction: Perspectives from needs and values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(8), 980–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Owusu-Ansah, F. E. (2004). Cultural orientation and subjective well-being. Journal of Science and Technology, 24, 76–83.Google Scholar
  48. Pedulla, D. S. (2012). The positive consequences of negative stereotypes: Race, sexual orientation, and the job application process. Working Paper. Center for the Study of Social Organizaton, Department of Sociology, Princeton University. http://www.princeton.edu/csso/working-papers/WP7.pdf. Accessed 8 Jan 2014.
  49. Restrepo, E. (2010). Identidad: apuntes teóricos y metodológicos. In G. Castellanos Llanos, D. I. Grueso & M. Rodriguez (Eds.), Identidad, cultura y política. Perspectivas conceptuales, miradas empíricas (pp. 61–70). México: Honorable Cámara de Diputados-Universidad del Valle-Miguel Ángel Porrúa.Google Scholar
  50. Retamozo, M. (2007). Cuaderno de Trabajo n 9. El método como postura. Apuntes sobre la conformaqción de la subjetividad epistémica y notas metodológicas sobre la construcción de un objeto de estudio. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
  51. Rodriguez de la Vega, L. (2011). Diversidad cultural, “sociedad del información y el conocimiento” y universidad. Magriberia, 4, 95–104.Google Scholar
  52. Russell, D., Peplau, L. A., & Cutrona, C. E. (1980). The Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale: Concurrent and discriminate validity evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 472–480.Google Scholar
  53. Sansone, L. (2003). Blackness without ethnicity: Constructing race in Brazil. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  54. Schumaker, J. F., Shea, J. D., Monfries, M. M., & Groth-Marnat, G. (1993). Loneliness and life satisfaction in Japan and Australia. Journal of Psychology, 127, 65−71.Google Scholar
  55. Schütz, A. (1974). El problema de la realidad social. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.Google Scholar
  56. Scott, A. (2008) The effect of doing qualitative research on novice researchers. European Journal for Qualitative Research in Psychotherapy, 3, 10–18.Google Scholar
  57. Sewell, W. H. Jr. (1999). The concept (s) of culture. In V. E. Bonnell & L. Hunt (Eds.), Beyond the cultural turn (pp. 35–61). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  58. Shin, D. C., Rutkowski, C. P., & Min, P. (2003). The quality of life in Korea. Comparative and dynamic perspectives. USA: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Skevington, S. M. (2002). Advancing cross-cultural research on quality of life: observations drawn from the WHOQOL development. Quality of Life Research, 11, 135–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Taylor, C., Appiah, K. A., Habermas, J., Rockefeller, S. C., Walzer, M., & Wolf, S. (1994). Multiculturalism: Examining the politics of recognition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Temple, B., Edwards, R., & Alexander C. (2006). Grasping at context: Cross language qualitative research as secondary qualitative data analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 7, 4, 10. http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/176/393. Accessed 6 Jan 2014.
  62. Theuns, P., Baran, B., Van Vaerenbergh, R., Hellenbosch, H., & Tiliouine H. (2012). A cross-cultural experimental approach to the contribution of health, religion and personal relations to subjective satisfaction with life as a whole. Psicológica, 33, 591–608.Google Scholar
  63. Thompson, J. B. (1998). Ideología y cultura moderna. México: Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana- Unidad Xochimilco.Google Scholar
  64. Tola, F., & Dragonetti, C. (2009). El Milenio de Oro de la filosofía de la India. Ilu. Revista de Ciencias de las Religiones, 14, 199–214.Google Scholar
  65. Tonon, G. (2013) La integración de métodos de investigación en Ciencias Sociales: la triangulación y los métodos mixtos. Documento de investigación número 135. Serie Documentos de investigación del Colegio Mexiquense. Toluca México. Mayo 2013Google Scholar
  66. Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
  67. Triandis, H. C. (1996). The psychological measurement of cultural syndromes. American Psychologist, 51, 407–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Triandis, H. C. (2000). Cultural syndromes and subjective well-being. In E. Diener & E. M. Suh (Eds.) Culture and subjective well-being. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  69. Venuti, L. (1998). The scandals of translation: Towards an ethics of difference. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  70. Verkuyten, M., & Kwa, I. (1994). Ethnic self-identification and psychological well-being among ethnic minority young people in the Netherlands. International Journal of Adolescence and Young people, 5, 19–34.Google Scholar
  71. Yáñez del Pozo, J. (2010). El pensamiento andino y la construcción de país plurinacionales y sociedades interculturales. ALAI, América Latina en Movimiento.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.UNICOM, Faculty of Social SciencesUniversidad Nacional de Lomas de ZamoraLomas de ZamoraArgentina
  2. 2.CICS, Faculty of Social SciencesUniversidad de Palermo, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos AiresBuenos AiresArgentina

Personalised recommendations